Observation and Protocol Statement

Article metrics


PHILOSOPHICAL discussions about our know ledge of the external world have drifted more and more towards linguistic considerations. This is mainly the case with logical positivism, which asserts the importance of the logic and language of science at the expense of metaphysics. In this line of thought, Dr. Schultzer asks himself the question, How can an observation be validly registered in language? A close analysis of the condition of observation and of the content and structure of the so-called “protocol statements” (elementary propositions about direct observations) shows him that the only possible way of answering it correctly is by stating explicitly the presuppositions of a valid linguistic formulation of observations tacitly recognized by every empirical observer. It is the discussion of these presuppositions which forms the object of this book. Even if the results obtained are not final, Dr. Schultzer's treat ment of the problem, especially when he proposes alternatives to the narrow orthodoxy of the Vienna circle, is both refreshing and useful.

Observation and Protocol Statement




By. Pp. ix + 151. (Copenhagen: Levin and Munksgaard; London: Williams and Norgate, Ltd., 1938.) 7s. 6d. net.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

G., T. Observation and Protocol Statement. Nature 143, 1003 (1939) doi:10.1038/1431003d0

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.