Letter | Published:

The Florisbad Skull

Nature volume 141, page 1010 (04 June 1938) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

SINCE its discovery by Prof. T. F. Dreyer1 in 1932, the Florisbad skull has been discussed by the leading anthropologists2 of South Africa. No one in Europe, so far as I know, has had an opportunity of examining a cast of the specimen. Thanks to Prof. Raymond Dart, of Johannesburg, I have been given this opportunity, and as a result I wish to confirm the importance of the discovery to all students of human evolution.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , Proc. Kon. Akad. v. Wetensch. te Amsterdam, 38, 119 (1935). A description of the skull with an account of the endocranial cast by . The endocranial cast has has also been described by (S. Afr. J. Sci., 33, 960; 1937). An account of the cultural and faunistic evidence is given by in Argeologiese Navorsing van die Nasionale Museum (Bloemfontein), 1, 65 (1938).

  2. 2.

    , S. Afr. J. Sci., 33, 64 (1937); , Report of XVI International Geological Congress (1936); , , Amer. J. Physical Anthrop., 23, 1 (1937); S. Afr. J. Sci., 34, 89 (1937).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Buckston Browne Farm, Downe, Kent. May 25.

    • ARTHUR KEITH

Authors

  1. Search for ARTHUR KEITH in:

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/1411010a0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.