The Function of Experiment

Abstract

IN continuing to maintain that stringent experimental test of a theory of Nature is pedantic, Mr. Whitrow would appear to be more extreme in his views than are most of the contributors to the symposium on physical science and philosophy1. Prof. Milne, for example, states that “the relevance of the theorems to Nature would require to be established by observation”2. When Mr. Whitrow persists in claiming the support of Galileo3 on the grounds of his (Galileo's) profession of readiness to accept his own theories4, he displays an imperfect understanding of the nature of experimental demonstration.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    NATURE, 139, 1008 (1937).

  2. 2

    NATURE, 139, 997 (1937).

  3. 3

    NATURE, 140, 646 (1937).

  4. 4

    Fahie, W. C., NATURE, 140, 646 (1937).

  5. 5

    Fisher, R. A., “The Design of Experiments”, p. 39 ( Oliver and Boyd ).

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

CHILDS, E. The Function of Experiment. Nature 140, 852–853 (1937). https://doi.org/10.1038/140852b0

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.