Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Amphetamine-Induced Increases in Extracellular Dopamine, Drug Wanting, and Novelty Seeking: A PET/[11C]Raclopride Study in Healthy Men

Abstract

Eight healthy men underwent two positron emission tomography (PET) [11C]raclopride scans, one following placebo, the second following d-amphetamine (0.30 mg/kg, p.o.). PET data were analyzed using: (1) brain parametric maps to statistically generate regions of significant change; and (2) a priori identified regions of interest (ROI) manually drawn on each individual's co-registered magnetic resonance (MR) images. Compared with placebo, d-amphetamine decreased [11C]raclopride binding potential (BP) with significant effects in ventral but not dorsal striatum. Change in BP in the statistically generated cluster correlated with self-reported drug-induced ‘drug wanting’ (r = 0.83, p = .01) and the personality trait of Novelty Seeking-Exploratory Excitability (r = 0.79, p = .02). The same associations were seen in the manually drawn ROI in ventral striatum but not in dorsal putamen or caudate. Changes in extracellular dopamine (DA) did not correlate with mood. Mesolimbic DA might mediate interest in obtaining reward rather than reward, per se. Individual differences in amphetamine-induced DA release might be related to predispositions to drug and novelty seeking.

Main

Preclinical studies indicate that psychostimulant drugs increase extracellular dopamine (DA) levels with preferential effects in ventral striatum (Di Chiara and Imperato 1988). The behavioral significance of increased DA, though, remains a subject of debate. One influential theory suggests that mesolimbic DA mediates rewarding, possibly pleasurable effects of addictive drugs (Wise 1982). Other work suggests that DA signals interest in rewards (Stewart et al. 1984), the expectation that a reward is forthcoming (Schultz 1998), or wanting reward as opposed to liking it (Robinson and Berridge 1993).

Significant individual variability in stimulant drug-induced DA release is apparent. Some evidence suggests that this variability reflects a pre-existing trait. Predictors of the variability include elevated exploratory behavior in novel environments (Hooks et al. 1991), high levels of sugar feeding (Sills and Crawley 1996), and a predisposition to rapidly acquire drug self-administration (Zocchi et al. 1998).

In humans, psychostimulant drugs of abuse elicit a range of behavioral effects, including mood elevation and increased drug wanting (Uhlenhuth et al. 1981; Jaffe et al. 1989; Cousins et al. 2001). Functional neuroimaging studies with labeled D2/D3 benzamide ligands suggest that 0.2 to 0.3 mg/kg of d-amphetamine given intravenously increases extracellular DA levels in human striatum (Laruelle et al. 1995; Breier et al. 1997; Drevets et al. 2001). The magnitude of the drug-induced DA release correlates with self-reported euphoria (Laruelle et al. 1995; Drevets et al. 2001); however, it remains unclear whether the mood-elevation is mediated by DA or instead reflects other effects of the drug. High amphetamine doses increase both catecholamine and serotonin release whereas lower doses primarily increase catecholamines (Kuczenski and Segal 1989). Mood-elevating effects of cocaine are reported to be reduced by lowering serotonin transmission (Aronson et al. 1995). In comparison, stimulant drug-induced mood elevation is not decreased consistently by DA antagonists (Brauer and de Wit 1997).

The present study addressed three questions. First, could a relatively low oral dose of d-amphetamine elicit detectable changes in [11C]raclopride binding? Second, would the effect on extracellular DA be larger in ventral than in dorsal striatum? Third, would amphetamine-induced increases in extracellular DA be related to subjective effects of the drug or the personality trait of novelty seeking?

METHODS

Subjects

Eight non-smoking men (Table 1) were recruited using newspaper advertisements. All were healthy, as determined by a physical exam, standard laboratory tests, and an interview using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (First et al. 1995). None had a personal or first-degree relative history of axis I psychiatric disorders. On the day of each positron emission tomography (PET) scan, all tested negative on a urine drug screen sensitive to cocaine, opiates, phencyclidine, lysergic acid diethylamide, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, and amphetamines (Triage Panel for Drugs of Abuse, Biosite Diagnosis©, San Diego, CA). The study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Montreal Neurological Institute. All subjects gave informed written consent.

Table 1 Subject Characteristics

PET and MRI

Subjects underwent two scans on separate days on a Siemens ECAT HR+ PET camera (approximate resolution 4.2 mm full width half maximum in center of field of view) with lead septa removed. Sixty minutes before tracer injection, a catheter was inserted into the subject's antecubital vein, and an oral dose of d-amphetamine was administered (0.0 or 0.3 mg/kg). Immediately before tracer injection, transmission scans were performed using 68Ga for attenuation correction. Approximately 10 mCi of [11C]raclopride was injected as an i.v. bolus and data were acquired for 60 min in time frames of progressively longer duration. PET studies were counterbalanced for the order of amphetamine administration and conducted between 2:00 and 5:00 P.M.

High resolution (1 mm) T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images were obtained for all subjects, co-registered to the summed radioactivity PET images (Evans et al. 1992), and linearly transformed into standardized stereotaxic space (Talairach and Tournoux 1988) using automated algorithms (Collins et al. 1994).

PET images were reconstructed using a 6-mm full width half maximum Hanning filter. Parametric images were generated by calculating [11C]raclopride binding potential (BP = Bmaxfree/Kd) at each voxel using a simplified compartmental model with cerebellar activity as a reference (Gunn et al. 1997). T-Maps were then constructed, representing voxel-by-voxel t-tests of change in [11C]raclopride BP between the amphetamine and placebo scans (Aston et al. 2000). Clusters of statistically significant change were identified by thresholding the t-maps at a value of t > 4.2, which corresponds to p < .05 corrected for multiple comparisons (Worsley et al. 1996). BP values for each subject were extracted from the region identified by the t-map as well as from regions of interest (ROI) drawn manually on aligned transverse slices from each subject's MRI in stereotaxic space on caudate nucleus, dorsal putamen, and ventral striatum bilaterally. The boundaries for each ROI were labeled well within the gray matter of the structure to reduce potential artifacts due to misalignment or partia l volume effects (Figure 1). The rostrocaudal extent of the ROI relative to the anterior commissure was approximately the same for all subjects, z = 2 to 15 mm for caudate, z = 2 to 10 mm for putamen, and z = −4 to −8 mm for ventral striatum, corresponding approximately to nucleus accumbens (Talairach and Tournoux 1988). Left and right ROI values were combined. ROI drawn on five consecutive 1-mm slices in cerebellum served as the reference region.

Figure 1
figure1

One subject's [11C]raclopride binding potential map (right striatum) for the first scan day transformed to Talairach space and overlaid on his MRI in Talairach space. Regions of interest drawn on the same subject's MRI (left striatum) in Talairach space. Red: Ventral Striatum / Nucleus Accumbens (z = −8 to −4), Blue: Putamen (z = 2 to 10), Green: Caudate (z = 2 to 15).

Subjective Effects of Amphetamine

Subjective effects induced by d-amphetamine were measured with the Addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI) Benzedrine scale (Hill et al. 1963), and 10 visual analog scales (VAS) labeled Want Drug, Like Drug, Euphoria, Mind Racing, Alert, Energetic, Excited, Rush, Anxiety, and High (Bond and Lader 1974). The VAS were administered at five time points, immediately before drug (or placebo), and at 30, 60, 90 and 120 min afterward. Changes in VAS measures were analyzed as the peak change from pre-drug administration to the end of the test session. The ARCI was administered only once per test session, 120 min post-drug.

Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire

All subjects completed the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire (TPQ; Cloninger 1987; Cloninger et al. 1991). The TPQ measures four dimensions, Novelty Seeking, Harm Avoidance, Reward Dependence, and Persistence. Cloninger has proposed that TPQ traits of Novelty Seeking, Harm Avoidance, and Reward Dependence might be related, in significant part, to DA, serotonin, and norepinephrine neurotransmission, respectively.

Plasma Amphetamine

Blood samples were drawn immediately before d-amphetamine administration and 90 min later, which corresponded to the mid-point of the 60-min PET scan. Plasma concentrations of amphetamine were analyzed with electron-capture gas chromatography after extraction and derivatization of amphetamine (Paetsch et al. 1992). Plasma samples from one subject were lost.

Statistics

Plasma d-amphetamine concentrations, self-report questionnaire data, and [11C]raclopride ROI BP values were analyzed by within groups ANOVA and, when appropriate, Newman-Keuls post hoc tests. Correlations were assessed with Pearson's correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

On the day that subjects received active drug, plasma d-amphetamine levels increased from 0.0 ± 0.0 ng/ml before drug administration to 10.5 ± 8.2 ng/ml 90 min later (p = .001). d-Amphetamine was not detected on the placebo test day.

Compared with placebo, d-amphetamine significantly increased ARCI scores (F1,7 = 10.34, p = .02), and the magnitude of this effect was non-significantly associated with plasma d-amphetamine levels (r2 = 0.46, p = .09). d-Amphetamine, compared with placebo, also led to greater peak changes on VAS labeled ‘Alert’ (F1,7 = 23.20, p = .002), ‘Mind Racing’ (F1,7 = 19.64, p = .003), ‘Energetic’ (F1,7 = 11.06, p = .01), and ‘Excited’ (F1,7 = 7.32, p = .03) (Table 2) . Peak changes on the VAS labeled ‘Like Drug’ correlated with plasma concentrations of d-amphetamine (r2 = 0.61, p = .04).

Table 2 Effect of d-amphetamine (0.0, 0.3 mg/kg, p.o.) on Addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI) Scores and Visual Analog Scales (Δ max). Effects Assessed with 2-Tailed Repeated Measures t-tests

A Drug X Region ANOVA yielded significant main effects of Drug (F1,7 = 55.6, p < .001) and Region (F2,14 = 31.2, p < .0001), and a significant Drug X Region interaction (F2,14 = 8.96, p = .003). [11C]Raclopride BP values were significantly lower in ventral striatum, compared with caudate and putamen (p < .001) on both the placebo and amphetamine scans (p < .001) (Table 3), consistent with previous post-mortem and PET studies (Hall et al. 1994; Mawlawi et al. 2001).

Table 3 [11C]Raclopride binding potential values on test days with placebo or d-amphetamine (0.3 mg/kg, p.o.). Newman-Keuls post hoc tests

d-Amphetamine, compared with placebo, significantly decreased [11C]raclopride BP in ventral striatum only (p = .05); d-amphetamine did not decrease [11C]raclopride BP in caudate (p = .68) or putamen (p = .96) (Table 3). The percent change in BP also varied with ROI (F2,14 = 6.01, p = .01), and the effect of d-amphetamine was significantly greater in ventral striatum (−10.7 ± 9.5%) than in dorsal putamen (0.4 ± 9.0%, p = .02) or caudate (−1.5 ± 9.3%, p = .02). Parametric mapping analyses yielded the same results. Compared with placebo, a significant effect of d-amphetamine on [11C]raclopride BP was restricted to bilateral ventral striatum (peak effect: coordinates = 32, −3, −6, t = 7.34) (Figure 2). In the t-map identified cluster there was a mean 8.4 ± 19.6% decrease in [11C]raclopride BP.

Figure 2
figure2

Statistically generated t-map of d-amphetamine–induced changes in [11C]raclopride binding potential superimposed on average MRI. Right side on right.

Changes in [11C]raclopride BP in the t-map identified cluster and the manually drawn ventral striatum were significantly correlated (r2 = 0.67, p = .01) supporting the proposition that both methods of analysis identified the same changes in tracer binding. In comparison, changes in [11C]raclopride BP in caudate and putamen correlated with each other (r2 = 0.88, p < .001) but not with changes in ventral striatum or the t-map (p > .70).

d-Amphetamine–induced changes in [11C]raclopride BP in the ventral striatum correlated significantly with two TPQ items, overall Novelty Seeking (r2 = 0.56, p = .03) and the Novelty Seeking subscale, Exploratory Excitability (r2 = 0.55, p = .05). Similar correlations were also observed in the t-map identified region (Table 4 and Figure 3). Change in [11C]raclopride BP did not correlate significantly with any other TPQ scale or subscale (p > .10).

Table 4 Pearson correlations with change in [11C]raclopride binding potential
Figure 3
figure3

Correlations between d-amphetamine–induced increases in extracellular DA and Novelty Seeking and the Novelty Seeking subscale, Exploratory-Excitability. [11C]Raclopride BP values were extracted from two regions, the manually drawn region of interest in ventral striatum and the statistically generated parametric t-map.

d-Amphetamine–induced increases in extracellular DA in the ventral striatum correlated significantly with only one reported effect of the drug, ‘Want Drug’ on the d-amphetamine test day (t-Map: r2 = 0.69, p = .01; ROI: r2 = 0.38, p = .10) (Table 4 and Figure 4). Self-reported ‘Want Drug’ on the d-amphetamine test day also correlated with the TPQ Novelty Seeking trait, Exploratory Excitability (r2 = 0.74, p = .006); this association was not seen on the placebo test (r2 = 0.004, p = .89).

Figure 4
figure4

Correlation between d-amphetamine–induced drug wanting and (left) d-amphetamine–induced DA release, and (right) TPQ Novelty Seeking-Exploratory Excitability scores.

Drug-induced change in extracellular DA in dorsal caudate and putamen correlated negatively with one reported effect of the drug, ‘Mind Racing’ (caudate: r2 = −0.70, p = .009; putamen: r2 = −0.55, p = .03); however, these negative correlations, not expected a priori, were driven by a single outlier, and the associations were no longer significant when this subject was removed (caudate: p > .15; putamen: p > .65). Change in BP did not correlate significantly with any other self-report variable.

Age (r2 = −0.46, p = .06) and plasma concentrations of d-amphetamine (r2 = 0.47, p = .09, n = 7) both tended to correlate with increases in extracellular DA in the ventral striatum, though not in other regions (p > .20).

DISCUSSION

The present study suggests that: (1) a moderately low oral dose of d-amphetamine (0.3 mg/kg) significantly increases extracellular DA in human striatum; (2) this effect occurs only in the ventral striatum; and (3) d-amphetamine–induced increases in extracellular DA may be more closely related to drug-induced drug wanting than mood-elevation; and (4) a relatively high score on the personality trait of Novelty Seeking predicts greater amphetamine-induced DA release and amphetamine-induced drug wanting. A non-significant trend (p = .06) suggested that the ability of d-amphetamine to induce DA release in the ventral striatum might decrease from age 20 to age 30.

The effect of d-amphetamine 0.3 mg/kg, given p.o., on [11C]raclopride BP was smaller and more circumscribed than that reported to occur when the same dose is given intravenously. d-Amphetamine, 0.3 mg/kg, p.o. decreased [11C]raclopride BP in the ventral striatum by an average of 10%; significant changes were not seen in caudate or dorsal putamen. In comparison, the same dose of d-amphetamine given i.v. decreases [11C]raclopride BP by 10–20% in striatum as a whole (Breier et al. 1997; Drevets et al. 2001). A recent report suggests that 0.3 mg/kg d-amphetamine given i.v. also has larger effects on [11C]raclopride BP in the ventral striatum than other subcompartments (anteroventral striatum, −15.4 ± 10.6%; dorsal putamen, −10.2 ± 10.6%; dorsal caudate, −4.5 ± 8.2%) (Drevets et al. 2001). The present study with a low oral dose more clearly identifies preferential effects in ventral striatum, and this regional specificity is supported by both manually drawn ROI and statistically generated clusters.

Individual variability in the ability of d-amphetamine to decrease [11C]raclopride BP in the ventral striatum was correlated with self-reported drug-induced ‘Want Drug.’ To our knowledge, an association between DA release and drug wanting has not been assessed in previous neuroimaging studies. In comparison, PET and functional MRI studies suggest that both cue- and drug-induced activation of the ventral striatum and interconnected limbic regions correlates with drug craving in cocaine dependent subjects (Grant et al. 1996; Breiter et al. 1997; Childress et al. 1999; Wang et al. 1999; Kilts et al. 2001). Moreover, accumulating findings in the animal literature also suggest a close association between mesolimbic DA transmission and interest in addictive drugs. Midbrain DA cell firing rates (Schultz 1998) and extracellular DA levels in nucleus accumbens (Gratton 1996) increase as animals approach rewards. Low to moderate doses of DA agonists increase drug seeking behavior (Stewart et al. 1984; Robinson and Berridge 1993). A larger DA response to acute stimulant drug administration predicts more rapid acquisition of drug self-administration (Zocchi et al. 1998).

The magnitude of amphetamine-induced increases in extracellular DA in the ventral striatum also correlated with the personality trait of Novelty Seeking. A positive association between TPQ Novelty Seeking and DA neurotransmission has been suggested previously, based on pharmaconeuroendocrine indices (Gerra et al. 2000). Novelty Seeking scores also predicted VAS ‘Want Drug’ on the amphetamine but not placebo test day. One possibility is that amphetamine elicits a DA-mediated appetitive state that increases drug wanting; this effect might be larger in high Novelty Seekers. Animal studies suggest that exploratory behavior in novel environments predicts the nucleus accumbens DA response to cocaine (Hooks et al. 1991) and propensity to self-administer amphetamine (Piazza et al. 1989) and cocaine (Marinelli and White 2000). These and other observations are consistent with the hypothesis that vulnerability to substance abuse in high novelty seekers (Howard et al. 1997; Gabel et al. 1999) could be related, in part, to an increased DA response to abused drugs. Repeated dr ug use might aggravate these pre-existing tendencies, altering cortico-striatal circuitry, potentiating reward seeking tendencies, and producing decision-making deficits that increase further the tendency to self-administer drugs (Robinson and Berridge 1993; Rogers et al. 1999; Rahman et al. 2001).

Amphetamine-induced DA release did not correlate with self-reported mood-elevation or overt stimulant effects of the drug. Some evidence suggests that psychostimulant and mood-elevating drug effects might be more closely related to increases in norepinephrine (Rothman et al. 2001) and serotonin (Aronson et al. 1995) than DA transmission. Previously reported correlations between euphorigenic and DA releasing effects of intravenous amphetamine (Laruelle et al. 1995; Drevets et al. 2001) might be related to the ability of higher doses to release all three monoamines (Kuczenski and Segal 1989). The present results do not preclude a relation between DA and affect, though. Other evidence supports such an association (Murphy et al. 1971; Fibiger 1995; Willner 1995). One possibility is that DA influences mood via its regulation of motivational states. The present study suggests that mesolimbic DA transmission might be more closely related to the appetitive component of emotion than providing a sufficient substrate of euphoric mood, per se.

The neuroanatomical pathways innervating ventral versus dorsal striatum are well described (Alexander et al. 1986; Moore and Bloom 1978; Lynd-Balta and Haber 1994; Haber and McFarland 1999). In primates, the ventral striatum is interconnected with the limbic system and receives DA projections primarily from the dorsal tier of the midbrain tegmentum. Additional input to the ventral striatum comes primarily from limbic structures including amygdala, anterior cingulate and the medial and orbitofrontal cortex; these systems are thought to play important roles in associating behavior with reward, attention to affectively relevant stimuli, and the initiation and inhibition of responses to rewards and punishments. In comparison, DA projections to the dorsal caudate-putamen originate primarily in the ventral tier of midbrain DA cell bodies. Cortical inputs to the caudate-putamen come from throughout the neocortex, particularly sensory-motor cortices and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

The conclusions suggested by the present study should be interpreted in light of the following considerations. The sample size is modest (n = 8) though within the norms for assessing effects of pharmacological challenges within subjects. The identified correlations would not have withstood Bonferroni corrections, but they were replicated in ventral striatum as identified by two methods, parametric mapping and manually drawn ROI. Second, administering drugs p.o. is associated with lower and more variable bioavailability than the i.v. route (Angrist et al. 1987; Ylitalo 1991). However, plasma d-amphetamine levels could be measured, and there was some evidence of an association between plasma concentrations and change in both extracellular DA and subjective state. Third, as typically seen, only half of the subjects indicated that they wanted more of the drug (Uhlenhuth et al. 1981). However, it was this individual variability that correlated with change in [11C]raclopride BP. Fourth, recent studies have questioned the mechanisms by which DA agonists decrease labeled D2 ligand BP. The original model had proposed competition between the labeled ligand and endogenous DA for occupancy of DA D2 receptors (Seeman et al. 1989). More recent work raises the possibility that increased synaptic DA levels might induce receptor internalization (Laruelle 2000). Benzamide ligands, though, seem not to cross the cell membrane, thereby restricting their access to cell surface receptor sites (Laruelle 2000; Seeman and Kapur 2000). Moreover, combination PET-microdialysis studies conducted in the same animal indicate that decreases in benzamide ligand BP have a strong linear association with increases in dialysate DA concentrations (Laruelle et al. 1997; Endres et al. 1997). These observations suggest that decreases in [11C]raclopride BP in the same individual can be considered to reflect increases in extracellular DA.

In conclusion, the small sample size emphasizes the need for caution, but the present results suggest that DA transmission in subcompartments of human striatum is differentially affected by amphetamine and has different behavioral significance. First, a low oral dose of d-amphetamine increased extracellular DA with significant effects seen in ventral striatum only. Second, there was a close association between three variables: (1) amphetamine-induced DA release; (2) amphetamine-induced drug wanting; and (3) the personality trait of novelty seeking. All three variables might be related to susceptibility to drug seeking behavior and collectively be predictive of vulnerability to substance abuse.

References

  1. Alexander GE, DeLong MR, Strick PL . (1986): Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 9: 357–381

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Angrist B, Corwin J, Bartlik B, Cooper T . (1987): Early pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of oral d-amphetamine in normal subjects. Biol Psychiatry 22: 1357–1368

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aronson SC, Black JE, McDougle CJ, Scanley BE, Jatlow P, Kosten TR, Heninger GR, Price LH . (1995): Serotonergic mechanisms of cocaine effects in humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 119: 179–185

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aston JA, Gunn RN, Worsley KJ, Ma Y, Evans AC, Dagher A . (2000): A statistical method for the analysis of positron emission tomography neuroreceptor ligand data. Neuroimage 12: 245–256

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bond A, Lader M . (1974): The use of analog scales in rating subjective feelings. Br J Med Psychol 47: 211–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brauer LH, De Wit H . (1997): High dose pimozide does not block amphetamine-induced euphoria in normal volunteers. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 56: 265–272

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Breier A, Su T-P, Saunders R, Carson RE, Kolachana BS, de Bartolomeis A, Weinberger DR, Weisenfeld N, Malhotra AK, Eckelman WC, Pickar D . (1997): Schizophrenia is associated with elevated amphetamine-induced synaptic dopamine concentrations: Evidence from a novel positron emission tomography method. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 2569–2574

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Breiter HC, Gollub RL, Weisskoff RM, Kennedy DN, Makris N, Berke JD, Kantor HL, Gastfriend DR, Riorden JP, Mathew RT, Rosen BR, Hyman SE . (1997): Acute effects of cocaine on human brain activity and emotion. Neuron 19: 591–611

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Childress AR, Mozley PD, McElgin W, Fitzgerald J, Reivich M, O′Brien CP . (1999): Limbic activation during cue-induced cocaine craving. Am J Psychiatry 156: 11–18

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cloninger CR . (1987): A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants. A proposal. Arch Gen Psychiatry 44: 573–588

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cloninger CR, Przybeck TR, Svrakic DM . (1991): The Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire: U.S. normative data. Psych Rep 69: 1047–1057

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Collins DL, Neelin P, Peter TM, Evans AC . (1994): Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space. J Comput Assist Tomogr 18: 192–205

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cousins MS, Stamat HM, de Wit H . (2001): Acute doses of d-amphetamine and bupropion increase cigarette smoking. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 157: 243–253

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Di Chiara G, Imperato A . (1988): Drugs abused by humans preferentially increase synaptic dopamine concentrations in the mesolimbic system of freely moving rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 5274–5278

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Drevets WC, Gautier C, Price JC, Kupfer DJ, Kinahan PE, Grace AA, Price JL, Mathis CA . (2001): Amphetamine-induced dopamine release in human ventral striatum correlates with euphoria. Biol Psychiatry 49: 81–96

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Endres CJ, Kolachana BS, Saunders RC, Su T, Weinberger RC, Breier A, Eckelman WC, Carson RE . (1997): Kinetic modeling of [11C]raclopride: combined PET-microdialysis studies. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 17: 932–942

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Evans AC, Marrett S, Neelin P, Collins L, Worsley K, Dai W, Milot S, Meyer E, Bub D . (1992): Anatomical mapping of functional activation in stereotactic coordinate space. Neuroimage 1: 43–53

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fibiger HC . (1995): Neurobiology of depression: focus on dopamine. In Fratta W. Pani L. Serra G Depression and Mania From Neurobiology to Treatment. New York, Raven Press, pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  19. First MB, Spitzer RI, Gibbon M . (1995): Axis I Disorders. New York, New York State Psychiatric Institute

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gabel S, Stallings MC, Schmitz S, Young SE, Fulker DW . (1999): Personality dimensions and substance misuse: relationship in adolescents, mothers and fathers. Am J Addict 8: 101–113

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gerra G, Zaimovic A, Timpano M, Zambelli U, Delsignore R, Brambilla F . (2000): Neuroendocrine correlates of temperamental traits in humans. Psychoneuroendocrinology 25: 479–496

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Grant S, London ED, Newlin DB, Villemange VL, Liu X, Contoreggi C, Phillips RL, Kimes AS, Margolin A . (1996): Activation of memory circuits during cue-elicited cocaine craving. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 12040–12045

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gunn RN, Lammertsma AA, Hume SP, Cunningham VJ . (1997): Parametric imaging of ligand-receptor binding in PET using a simplified reference region model. Neuroimage 6: 279–287

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Haber SN, McFarland NR . (1999): The concept of the ventral striatum in nonhuman primates. Ann NY Acad Sci 877: 33–48

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hall H, Sedvall G, Magnusson O, Kopp J, Halldin C, Farde L . (1994): Distribution of D1- and D2-dopamine receptors, and dopamine and its metabolites in the human brain. Neuropsychopharmacology 11: 245–256

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hill HE, Haertzen CA, Wolbach AB Jr, Miner EJ . (1963): The addiction research center inventory: Appendix I. Items comprising empirical scales for seven drugs. II. Items which do not discriminate placebo from any drug condition. Psychopharmacologia 4: 184–205

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hooks MS, Jones GH, Smith AD, Neill DB, Justice JB Jr . (1991): Response to novelty predicts the locomotor and nucleus accumbens dopamine response to cocaine. Synapse 9: 121–128

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Howard MO, Kivlahan D, Walker RD . (1997): Cloninger's tridimensional theory of personality and psychopathology: applications to substance use disorders. J Stud Alcohol 58: 48–66

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jaffe JH, Cascella NG, Kumor KM, Sherer MA . (1989): Cocaine-induced cocaine craving. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 97: 59–64

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kilts CD, Schweitzer JB, Quinn CK, Gross RE, Faber TL, Muhammad F, Ely TD, Hoffman JM, Drexler KPG . (2001): Neural activity related to drug craving in cocaine addiction. Arch Gen Psychiatry 58: 334–341

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kuczenski R, Segal D . (1989): Concomitant characterization of behavioral and striatal neurotransmitter response to amphetamine using in vivo microdialysis. J Neurosci 9: 2051–2065

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Laruelle M . (2000): Imaging synaptic neurotransmission with in vivo binding competition techniques: a critical review. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 20: 423–451

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Laruelle M, Abi-Dargham A, van Dyck CH, Rosenblatt W, Zea-Ponce Y, Zoghbi SS, Baldwin RM, Charney DS, Hoffer PB, Kung HF, Innis RB . (1995): SPECT imaging of striatal dopamine release after amphetamine challenge. J Nucl Med 36: 1182–1190

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Laruelle M, Iyer RN, al-Tikriti MS, Zea-Ponce Y, Malison R, Zoghbi SS, Baldwin RM, Kung HF, Charney DS, Hoffer PB, Innis RB, Bradberry CW . (1997): Microdialysis and SPECT measurements of amphetamine-induced dopamine release in nonhuman primates. Synapse 25: 1–14

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Logan J, Fowler JS, Dewey SL, Volkow ND, Gatley SJ . (2001): A consideration of the dopamine D2 receptor monomer-dimer equilibrium and the anomalous binding properties of the dopamine D2 receptor ligand, N-methylspiperone. J Neural Transm 108: 279–286

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lynd-Balta E, Haber SN . (1994): The organization of midbrain projections to the striatum in the primate: sensorimotor-related striatum versus ventral striatum. Neuroscience 59: 625–640

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Marinelli M, White FJ . (2000): Enhanced vulnerability to cocaine self-administration is associated with elevated impulse activity of midbrain dopamine neurons. J Neurosci 20: 8876–8885

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mawlawi O, Martinez D, Slifstein M, Broft A, Chatterjee R, Hwang D-R, Huang Y, Simpson N, Ngo K, Van Heertum R, Laruelle M . (2001): Imaging human mesolimbic dopamine transmission with positron emission tomography: I. Accuracy and precision of D2 receptor parameter measurements in ventral striatum. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 21: 1034–1057

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Moore RY, Bloom FE . (1978): Central catecholamine neuron systems: anatomy and physiology of the dopamine systems. Annu Rev Neurosci 1: 129–169

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Murphy DL, Brodie HK, Goodwin FK, Bunney WE Jr . (1971): Regular induction of hypomania by L-dopa in “bipolar” manic-depressive patients. Nature 229: 135–136

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nurnberger JI Jr, Gershon ES, Simmons S, Ebert M, Kessler LR, Dibble ED, Jimerson SS, Brown GM, Gold P, Jimerson DC, Guroff JJ, Storch FI . (1982): Behavioral, biochemical and neuroendocrine responses to amphetamine in normal twins and ‘well-state’ bipolar patients. Psychoneuroendocrinology 7: 163–176

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Paetsch PR, Baker GB, Caffaro LE, Greenshaw AJ, Rauw GA, Coutts RT . (1992): Electron-capture gas chromatographic procedure for simultaneous determination of amphetamine and N-methylamphetamine. J Chromatogr Biomed Appl 573: 313–317

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Piazza PV, Deminière JM, Le Moal M, Simon H . (1989): Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science 245: 1511–1513

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rahman S, Sahakian BJ, Cardinal RN, Rogers RD, Robbins TW . (2001): Decision making and neuropsychiatry. Trends Cog Sci 5: 271–277

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Robinson TE, Berridge KC . (1993): The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 18: 247–291

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Rogers RD, Everitt BJ, Baldacchino A, Blackshaw AJ, Swainson R, Wynne K, Baker NB, Hunter J, Carthy T, Booker E, London M, Deakin JFW, Sahakian BJ, Robbins TW . (1999): Dissociable deficits in the decision-making cognition of chronic amphetamine abusers, opiate abusers, patients with focal damage to prefrontal cortex, and tryptophan-depleted normal volunteers: evidence for monoaminergic mechanisms. Neuropsychopharmacology 20: 322–339

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Rothman RB, Baumann MH, Dersch CM, Romero DV, Rice KC, Carroll FI, Partilla JS . (2001): Amphetamine-type central nervous system stimulants release norepinephrine more potently than they release dopamine and serotonin. Synapse 39: 32–41

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sax KW, Strakowski SM . (1998): Enhanced behavioral response to repeated d-amphetamine and personality traits in humans. Biol Psychiatry 44: 1192–1195

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Schultz W . (1998): Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons. J Neurophysiol 80: 1–27

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Seeman P, Guan HC, Niznik HB . (1989): Endogenous dopamine lowers the dopamine D2 receptor density as measured by [3H]raclopride: implications for positron emission tomography of the human brain. Synapse 3: 96–97

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Seeman P, Kapur S . (2000): Schizophrenia: more dopamine, more D2 receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 7673–7675

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sills TL, Crawley JN . (1996): Individual differences in sugar consumption predict amphetamine-induced dopamine overflow in nucleus accumbens. Eur J Pharmacol 303: 177–181

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Stewart J, de Wit H, Eikelboom R . (1984): Role of unconditioned and conditioned drug effects in the self-administration of opiates and stimulants. Psychol Rev 91: 251–268

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Talairach J, Tournoux P . (1988): Co-planar Stereotactic Atlas of the Human Brain. Stuttgart, Thieme

    Google Scholar 

  55. Uhlenhuth EH, Johanson CE, Kilgore K, Kobasa SC . (1981): Drug preference and mood in humans: preference for d-amphetamine and subject characteristics. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 74: 191–194

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Wang G-J, Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Cervany P, Hitzeman RJ, Pappas NR, Wong CT, Felder CT . (1999): Regional brain metabolic activation during craving elicited by recall of previous drug experiences. Life Sci 64: 775–784

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Willner P . (1995): Dopaminergic mechanisms in depression and mania. In Bloom FE Kupfer DJ(eds), Psychopharmacology: The Fourth Generation of Progress. New York, Raven Press, pp 921–931

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wise RA . (1982): Neuroleptics and operant behavior: the anhedonia hypothesis. Behav Brain Sci 5: 39–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Worsley KJ, Marrett S, Neelin P, Vandal AC, Friston KJ, Evans AC . (1996): A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation. Hum Brain Mapp 4: 58–73

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Ylitalo P . (1991): Effect of exercise on pharmacokinetics. Ann Med 23: 289–294

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Zocchi A, Orsini C, Cabib S, Puglisi-Allegra S . (1998): Parallel strain-dependent effect of amphetamine on locomotor activity and dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens: an in vivo study in mice. Neuroscience 82: 521–528

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A preliminary report based on this study was presented at the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Canadian College of Neuropsychopharmacology (2000).

This work was supported by two operating grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, MOP–36429 to M.L., C.B. and A.D., and MOP-49480 to A.D. M.L. and C.B. are recipients of salary awards from Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec (FRSQ). We thank Rick Fukusawa, Gary Sauchuk, Dean Jolly, Shadreck Mzengeza, and Mirjana Kovacevic for excellent technical assistance, Dr. Robert Lisbona, Chief of Nuclear Medicine at the MNI, for valuable help during the PET scans, and Dr. Gabriel Léger, Dr. Roger Gunn, and Dr. John Aston for assistance in analyzing the PET data.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Leyton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leyton, M., Boileau, I., Benkelfat, C. et al. Amphetamine-Induced Increases in Extracellular Dopamine, Drug Wanting, and Novelty Seeking: A PET/[11C]Raclopride Study in Healthy Men. Neuropsychopharmacol 27, 1027–1035 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-133X(02)00366-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Addiction
  • Reward
  • Reinforcement
  • Nucleus accumbens

Further reading

Search

Quick links