Main

Psilocybin, a potent indoleamine hallucinogen and 5-HT receptor stimulating agent, has been reported to produce a psychosis-like syndrome in man resembling the first manifestation of schizophrenia in certain respects [for review see (Fischman 1983; Gouzoulis-Mayfrank et al. 1998)]. Particularly, ego-disorders (Rümmele and Gnirss 1961; Vollenweider et al. 1997), affective changes (Rümmele and Gnirss 1961), loosened associations (Spitzer et al. 1996) and perceptual alterations commonly seen in psilocybin-induced psychosis are also observed in incipient acute schizophrenic stages (Bowers and Freedman 1966; Heimann, 1986; Gouzoulis et al. 1994). In support of these suggested clinical similarities, we recently found that psilocybin produced a marked prefrontal and anterior cingulate activation in normal subjects comparable to the hyperfrontal pattern observed in some (Cleghorn et al. 1989; Ebmeier et al. 1993, 1995; Catafau et al. 1994; Parellada et al. 1994; Ebmeier et al. 1995; Sabri et al. 1997) but not all (Andreasen et al. 1992; Buchsbaum et al. 1992; Liddle et al. 1992; Siegel et al. 1993) acute schizophrenic patients. A number of functional animal studies have suggested that indoleamine (psilocybin, LSD) and phenylethylamine (DOI, mescaline) hallucinogens produce their psychotomimetic effects primarily through excessive stimulation of 5-HT, and 5-HT2A receptors in particular (McKenna et al. 1989; Pierce and Peroutka 1989; Aghajanian 1994; Sipes and Geyer 1994; Padich et al. 1996). This assumption was corroborated in a recent human study demonstrating that the psychotomimetic effects of psilocybin can be blocked dose-dependently by pretreatment with the preferential 5-HT2A receptor antagonist ketanserin (Vollenweider et al. 1998). However, pretreatment with the D2-antagonist haloperidol also reduces some of the positive symptoms of psilocybin psychosis. This raises the possibility that symptoms of psilocybin are secondary responses to increased dopaminergic transmission (Vollenweider et al. 1998). Hence, a contribution of the dopamine systems to the effects of psilocybin, presumably through a serotonin-dopamine interaction, cannot be ruled out.

Functional interactions between central serotonin (5-HT) and dopamine (DA) systems have been well documented. Electrophysiological, biochemical, and behavioral evidence suggests that the ascending serotonergic pathways from the medial and dorsal raphe modulate or control the function of the mesolimbic and mesostriatal dopamine systems (Joyce 1993; Zazpe et al. 1994; Kapur and Remington 1996). The modulating effect of serotonin on striatal dopamine release is, however, controversial. For example, there is evidence that serotonin may inhibit (de Belleroche and Bradford 1980; Ennis et al. 1981; Westfall and Tittermary 1982; Blandina et al. 1988) as well as stimulate DA release in the striatum (Benloucif et al. 1993; West and Galloway 1996; De Deurwaerdere et al. 1997). Similarly, local application of 5-HT or 5-HT agonists have been shown to reduce (de Belleroche and Gardiner 1982) and facilitate dopamine efflux in the nucleus accumbens (Guan and McBride 1989; Parson and Justice 1993). In respect to the 5-HT2 receptor agonist properties of psilocybin, it is of particular note that 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), a potent 5-HT releasing agent, has been shown to increase impulse-mediated striatal dopamine release through 5-HT2 receptor activation (Schmidt et al. 1992; Palfreyman et al. 1993; Schmidt et al. 1994; Yamamoto et al. 1995; Gudelsky and Nash 1996). Thus, 5-HT2A receptors located on dopaminergic and/or GABAergic neurons within the striatum and nucleus accumbens might provide an anatomical substrate for a serotonin-mediated psilocybin-induced dopamine release (Palacios et al. 1991).

The serotonin agonist psilocybin binds with high affinity at 5-HT2A (Ki = 6 nM) and to a lesser extent at 5-HT1A (Ki = 190 nM) (McKenna et al. 1990) receptors. More importantly, psilocybin and its centrally active metabolite psilocin have - in contrast to the classic indoleamine hallucinogen LSD - no affinity for dopamine D2 receptors (Ki = 17,000 nM) (Creese et al. 1975). The present pilot study was designed to investigate the impact of 5-HT receptor stimulation upon the dopamine systems by exploring the effect of a hallucinatory dose of psilocybin on striatal DA release in healthy volunteers. Positron emission tomography and the selective radioligand [11C]raclopride was used to examine the degree of striatal D2-dopamine receptor occupancy in the brain of healthy volunteers before and after single oral dose of psilocybin. This technique has been shown to be suitable to asses the effects of dopaminergic drugs on endogenous dopamine release (Dewey et al. 1993; Dewey et al. 1995), while a high test-retest reliability of PET with [11C]raclopride has been reported in healthy subjects (Nordström et al. 1992; Volkow et al. 1993). Based on our recent finding, that the D2 antagonist haloperidol partly reduces psilocybin-induced psychotic symptoms, we hypothesized that psilocybin might increase striatal dopamine release.

METHODS

Experimental Design

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Psychiatric University Hospital Zürich and the use of psychoactive drugs by the Swiss Federal Health Office, Department of Pharmacology and Narcotics, Berne.

Subjects

Seven male healthy volunteers (age, 27 ± 2.3 years) were recruited from university and hospital staff. Written consent was obtained. The subjects were screened by psychiatric interview to assure that the subjects had neither personal nor family histories of major psychiatric disorders in first-degree relatives. Subjects with a history of illicit drug abuse were excluded from the study. The “openness” and “neuroticism” scales of the Freiburg Personality Inventory (FPI) (Fahrenberg et al. 1984) were also used as exclusion criteria. Subjects were healthy according to physical examination, electrocardiogram, blood, and urine analysis.

Design

All subjects participated in two [11C]raclopride PET investigations, during which psilocybin or placebo was orally administered in a single blind fashion. PET scans were performed at monthly intervals and psilocybin and placebo were given in a randomized order across subjects. Based on previous psilocybin studies conducted in normals (Hasler et al. 1997; Vollenweider et al. 1997), psilocybin was dosed high enough (0.25 mg/kg p.o.) to induce illusions, hallucinations, changes of affect, and loosening of ego boundaries over a period of 120–180 minutes. After fasting subjects ingested capsules (8.00 AM) containing psilocybin 80 minutes before [11C]raclopride injection so that the PET measurement would coincide with the peak effect of the drug (Hasler et al. 1997). Psychopathological ratings were performed immediately after PET scanning (140 minutes after placebo or psilocybin intake).

Psychometric Scales

The “Altered State of Consciousness” (APZ-OAV) rating scale, a visual-analog scale and slightly modified version of the original APZ rating scale (66 instead of 72 items), was used to assess drug effects under placebo and drug conditions (Dittrich 1996). The APZ-OAV yields 3 dimensions (factors) comprised of several item clusters (Dittrich 1994). The first subscale, OSE (“oceanic boundlessness”), measures derealisation and depersonalisation associated with a positive basic mood ranging from enhanced well-being to grandiosity. The corresponding item clusters include “derealisation,” “depersonalisation,” “altered sense of time,” “positive basic mood,” and “mania-like experience.” The second subscale, VUS (“visionary restructuralization”), includes illusions, (pseudo-) hallucinations, synaesthesia, and altered experience of meaning. Item clusters are labeled “illusions,” “hallucinations,” “synaesthesias,” “changed meaning of percepts,” “facilitated recollection of memories,” and “facilitated imagination.” The third subscale, AIA (“anxious ego-dissolution”), measures thought disorder, delusions and loss of control over body and thought associated with arousal and anxiety. The item clusters are “frightening derealisation,” “thought disorder,” “delusion,” “loss of thought control,” and “loss of body control.”

Substance

Psilocybin (o-Phosphoryl-4-hydroxy-N, N-dimethyl-tryptamine) was obtained through the Swiss Federal Health Office (BAG), Department of Pharmacology and Narcotics, Berne.

PET Procedure

The [11C]raclopride PET scans were performed on a CTI 933/04-16 scanner. The spatial resolution of this scanner for 7 simultaneously acquired slices is after reconstruction 8 mm transaxially (full width half maximum).

Subjects were positioned in the scanner using an individually moulded head support. The head was aligned with the orbito-meatal line parallel to the detector ring with the help of laser beams. Just before tracer administration a 10-min transmission scan was collected using an external ring source of 68 Ga/68 Ge to correct for attenuation of γ-radiation by the brain and skull. Subjects received intravenous infusions of [11C]raclopride (in 10 ml saline; infused over 3 min) at the start of the scan. The injected dose was 238 ± 83 MBq (specific activity 10 ± 7 TBq/mmol). At the start of the infusion a standardized sequence of scans was recorded for a 60-min study period.

Image Analysis and Modelling of Data

Regions of interest (ROIs) were placed on the images with the highest tracer activity in the striatal regions and cerebellum using a standard template arrangement. A circular ROI (62,5 mm2) was placed over the caudate nucleus and ventral striatum (nucleus accumbens) of each hemisphere. On the putamen of each hemisphere an elliptical ROI (250 mm2) was placed. A further elliptical ROI (780 mm2) was placed over each cerebellar hemisphere. Regional time-activity curves were plotted for each subject and the data were analyzed using a reference tissue model with a cerebellar input function (Lammertsma and Hume 1996). This method measures the binding potential (BP), a measure of the ratio of receptor density and equilibrium dissociation constant (Bmax/Kd). Assuming that the Kd is unaffected by psilocybin, the BP provides a measure of the number of available D2-dopamine receptors in the caudate nucleus and putamen. Changes in raclopride binding potentials (Bmax/Kd) from placebo to psilocybin experiments were assessed as percent from placebo and calculated as follows: change (%) = (BPpsilocybin – BPplacebo)/BPplacebo × 100. To look for left-right asymmetries of raclopride binding during placebo and psilocybin experiments, asymmetry indices were calculated for all ROI's accordingly: ASIROI = (BPleft – BPright)/(BPleft + BPright) × 200.

Statistical Analysis

In this study, each subject served as his or her own control to minimize the effect of interindividual variation in psychopathology scores and PET measures. To examine differences in psychopathology scores or raclopride binding potentials between placebo and psilocybin, repeated measures ANOVAs with session as repeated factor were used. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to evaluate correlations between changes in raclopride binding potentials and psycho(patho)logical alterations. The criterion for significance was set at p < .05.

RESULTS

Psilocybin administration (0.25 mg/kg, p.o.) produced a psychotic syndrome that included disturbances of emotion and sensory perception, difficulties in thinking and in reality appraisal, as well as impairment of ego-functioning manifested as a loss of ego-boundaries. The psychotic symptoms appeared 20 to 30 minutes after oral ingestion of psilocybin and peaked after another 30 to 40 minutes, lasting for 1 to 2 hours. Subsequently symptoms slowly declined and completely subsided 5 to 6 hours after their initial appearance. During the peak period perceptual alterations included auditory and visual disturbances ranging from illusions to complex scenery hallucinations (VUS; Table 1). Subjects reported difficulties in concentrating and attention, thinking was accelerated or slowed down, whereas derealisation phenomena sometimes influenced the content of thought. As seen in Table 1, psilocybin also produced derealisation phenomena and loosening of ego-boundaries (OSE, AIA). In 4 of the 7 subjects, these symptoms were associated predominately with heightened mood, euphoria or a feeling of grandiosity (relatively high OSE and moderate AIA scores), while 3 of the subjects reacted with anxiety as indicated by relatively high AIA scores.

Table 1 Increases in APZ-OAV Scores OSE (oceanic boundlessness), VUS (visionary restructuralization), AIA (anxious ego-dissolution), and OSE-DEP (OSE depersonalisation) Subscore from Placebo to Psilocybin in Healthy Volunteers

As seen in Figure 1 , administration of psilocybin decreased [11C]raclopride receptor binding potential (BP) bilaterally in the striatum as compared to placebo condition. This finding suggests an increase in D2-dopamine receptor occupancy by endogenous dopamine. Peak uptake of [11C]raclopride occurred 17 minutes after radiotracer injection and cleared to 37 % of the peak value by 60 minutes post injection. The initial brain extraction of [11C]raclopride was not affected by psilocybin pretreatment. Analysis of asymmetry indices revealed no significant left-right asymmetries of [11C]raclopride BP in the caudate nucleus, putamen or ventral striatum, neither under placebo nor psilocybin condition. At 130 minutes after psilocybin ingestion, the reduction of tracer binding in the striatum averaged 19%. Significant mean (± SE) decreases of [11C]raclopride BP were seen in the caudate nucleus (left: 19.9 ± 5.5%, p < .01 / right: 18.6 ± 5.4%, p < .05) and putamen (21.0 ± 6.8%, p < .05 / 18.5 ± 4.8%, p < .01), while the decrease in the ventral striatum just missed statistical significance in the right side (left: 12.9 ± 8.0%, p = .12 / right: 18.8 ± 9.3%, p = .056). As seen in Figure 2 , the decrease in [11C]raclopride BP in the ventral striatum correlated with the increase in “depersonalisation” subscores of the OSE dimension (left and right: RSp = .96, p < .0005). No other correlations between changes in receptor BP and psychometric scores were found.

Figure 1
figure 1

Changes in [11C]raclopride binding potential (BP = Bmax/Kd) in (A) caudate nucleus, (B) putamen, and (C) ventral striatum during the peak phase of psilocybin-induced psychosis. Psilocybin significantly decreased [11C]raclopride BP in the caudate nucleus and putamen consistent with an increase in dopamine activity.

Figure 2
figure 2

Correlation between psilocybin-induced increases in depersonalisation subscores of the OSE scale and decrease in [11C]raclopride binding potential (% from placebo): (A) for the left and (B) for the right ventral striatum.

DISCUSSION

As previously reported, psilocybin given to healthy volunteers produced changes in mood, disturbances in thinking, illusions, elementary and complex visual hallucinations, as well as impairment of ego-functioning (Heimann 1986; Spitzer et al. 1996; Vollenweider et al. 1997). Most prominent among these symptoms were derealisation and depersonalisation associated with heightened mood or euphoria (OSE). There was also a marked increase in perceptual alterations (VUS), with elementary hallucinations being more pronounced than complex hallucinations and synaesthesias. However, we observed only a moderate increase in anxious ego dissolution (AIA). These findings are reminiscent of reports that the earliest affective changes in schizophrenic patients are often pleasurable (Bowers and Freedman 1966; Chapman 1966; Gouzoulis et al. 1994), and of the clinical observation that visual hallucinations occur significantly more often in acute than in chronic schizophrenic patients (McCabe et al. 1972; Freedman and Chapman 1973; Gouzoulis et al. 1994). Loosening of ego-boundaries and impaired thought control as measured by OSE and AIA, however, are not only common features of psilocybin-induced psychosis (Rümmele and Gnirss 1961; Bowers and Freedman 1966; Heimann, 1986; Vollenweider et al. 1997) and early schizophrenic stages, but also occur in chronic schizophrenics in acute episodes (Fischman 1983). Indeed, a recent study demonstrated that schizophrenic patients during both first episodes and relapse had similar OSE and AIA scores as seen in this study in psilocybin subjects (Gouzoulis-Mayfrank et al. 1998). However, unlike schizophrenics, most of psilocybin subjects recognized derealisation and depersonalisation as abnormal experiences and attributed them to the drug. A further difference between psilocybin-induced psychosis and schizophrenia is the rare occurrence of auditory hallucinations in psilocybin psychosis. Nevertheless, the present data in combination with previous findings suggest that psilocybin can produce a psychotic syndrome that resembles in certain respects acute schizophrenic decompensation.

The present data demonstrate that psilocybin decreased [11C]raclopride binding in the caudate nucleus and putamen in human subjects, reflecting an increase in striatal dopamine concentration. This raises the possibility that some of the observed psychosis-like symptoms were manifestations of increased striatal dopamine activity. In support of this assumption, we observed a strong correlation between the OSE depersonalisation subscore and the change in D2 receptor BP in the ventral striatum. Furthermore, consistent with this possibility, we recently found that the D2 antagonist haloperidol attenuated psilocybin-induced depersonalisation, derealisation and euphoria (Vollenweider et al. 1998). Interestingly, we recently also found a correlation of increased ventral striatal dopamine with OSE depersonalisation subscores in ketamine-induced psychosis (Vollenweider FX, Vontobel P, Øye I, Hell D, Leenders KL (1998a): Effects of S-ketamine on striatal dopamine release: a [11C]raclopride PET study of a model psychosis in humans. (submitted to J Psych Res)). A similar correlation between schizophrenia-like symptoms and changes in raclopride specific binding in the striatum has been reported in a ketamine study with healthy normals (Breier et al. 1998). Finally, in a SPECT study, amphetamine-induced decrease in striatal [123I]IBZM BP was associated with a worsening of positive psychotic symptoms in schizophrenic patients (Laruelle et al. 1996). Taken together, these findings suggest that elevation of dopamine release in the striatum, particularly in the ventral striatum, contributes to the formation of psychotic symptoms, especially those associated with affective changes ranging from enhanced mood to euphoria and grandiosity. However, it is also possible that these affective changes are the main manifestations of striatal dopamine release. Such a view is supported by a SPECT study reporting a correlation between amphetamine-induced decrease in striatal D2 availability and euphoria and alertness in healthy normals (Laruelle et al. 1995). In this latter study psychotic symptoms were not observed despite changes in striatal dopamine indices of similar magnitude as seen in the present study. Thus, it may be argued that, in psilocybin psychosis, specifically those aspects of psychotic symptoms related to euphoria and alertness may be mediated by striatal dopamine release, but that striatal dopamine release alone cannot account for the occurrence of psilocybin-induced psychotic symptoms. In this respect, it is of note that haloperidol had virtually no effect on psilocybin-induced hallucinations (VUS) and even increased anxious ego-dissolution (AIA) in psilocybin subjects, while ketanserin, a preferential 5-HT2A receptor antagonist, dose-dependently prevented psilocybin psychosis (Vollenweider et al. 1998). Thus, it appears that most of the psilocybin-induced psychotic symptoms may be mediated preferentially by serotonergic rather than mesostriatal dopaminergic systems. Finally, the present data do not allow to rule out a contribution of extrastriatal dopamine systems in psilocybin-induced psychosis.

There are a number of caveats to these speculations. First, data concerning striatal dopamine levels cannot be directly compared between different studies. For example, the PET ligands and mathematical models for determining shifts in indices of striatal dopamine concentrations were different for the aforementioned amphetamine (Laruelle et al. 1995) and the present study. Similar percent changes in D2 receptor availability as measured by different methods ([123I]IBZM binding and [11C]raclopride BP) may not necessarily reflect similar changes in extracellular dopamine concentrations. Second, the present correlation between depersonlisation and decrease in raclopride BP in the ventral striatum must be interpreted cautiously, since this decrease was only at a statistical trend level. Finally, the sample size of the present study was rather small. Further research with larger sample sizes will have to focus on using identical methodologies to study the effects of different serotonergic and dopaminergic drugs on striatal dopamine transmission and its relationship to various aspects of psychotic symptoms. Also, the involvment of extrastriatal dopamine transmission in psychotic states warrants further study using PET ligands specific to D1/D3 receptors.

The mechanisms by which psilocybin increases striatal dopamine release are unclear at this time. Given its lack of D2-dopamine receptor affinity and its strong agonist activity at 5-HT2 and 5-HT1 receptors, the present result strongly suggest that psilocybin may increase dopamine release through 5-HT receptor activation. This mechanism is consistent with recent studies demonstrating increased striatal dopamine levels after acute administration of the 5-HT releaser and uptake inhibitor fenfluramine (Smith et al. 1997) and chronic administration of the 5-HT uptake inhibitor citalopram (Tiihonen et al. 1996) in normal subjects as assessed by PET and [11C]raclopride. In animal studies, local application of 5-HT or 5-HT agonists by means of microdialysis was also reported to increase extracellular DA in the striatum (Benloucif and Galloway 1991; Benloucif and Galloway 1993; Bonhomme et al. 1995) and nucleus accumbens (Guan and McBride 1989; Parson and Justice 1993; Boulenguez et al. 1996). However, there is a minority of studies reporting an inhibitory influence of serotonergic stimulation on striatal dopamine concentration (Dewey et al. 1995; Kapur and Remington 1996).

Whether psilocybin increases striatal dopamine release through 5-HT2 receptor stimulation alone or in combination with 5-HT1 receptors cannot be inferred from the present data. Moreover, the interpretation of the present data is complicated by the fact that 5-HT2 receptor antagonism, but not 5-HT2 receptor stimulation, is generally thought to enhance striatal dopamine release (Kapur and Remington 1996). For example, altanserin, a 5-HT2 antagonist, has been shown to increase striatal dopamine release in baboons and rats (Dewey et al. 1995). However, there is substantial evidence from recent animal studies indicating that under certain conditions stimulation of 5-HT2 receptors can facilitate striatal dopamine release (West and Galloway 1996). For example, it has been demonstrated that the potent 5-HT releasing agent MDMA increases impulse-mediated striatal dopamine release and that this effect can be blocked by the highly selective 5-HT2A antagonist MDL100,907 (Schmidt et al. 1992, 1993). The blocking effects of 5-HT2 antagonists on the MDMA-mediated dopamine release were most evident when the dopaminergic system was activated (Schmidt et al. 1993; Gudelsky and Nash 1996). Thus it has been suggested that these findings indicate a permissive role for 5-HT2A receptors in the activation of the dopamine system, which may occur during states of high serotonergic activity or elevated dopamine efflux. Since psilocybin also acts upon 5-HT1A receptors (Buckholtz et al. 1990; McKenna et al. 1990) and stimulation of 5-HT1A autoreceptors is expected to enhance the dopaminergic tone (Neal-Beeliveau et al. 1993), one might speculate that psilocybin increases striatal dopamine release through a concomitant stimulation of both 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors. This hypothesis is supported by the finding that 5-HT1A agonists can facilitate dopamine release in the striatum and nucleus accumbens (Benloucif and Galloway 1991), while 5-HT1A antagonist have been reported to inhibit dopamine release in these brain regions (Parson and Justice 1993; Boulenguez et al. 1996; Nomikos et al. 1996). Furthermore, recent studies in rats demonstrated that the changes in locomotor activity produced by the 5-HT1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT (Hillegaart et al. 1995) or the classic indolehallucinogen LSD were attenuated by pretreatment with the selective 5-HT1A antagonist WAY-100,635 (Sipes and Geyer 1995; Krebs-Thomson and Geyer 1996). It is to be noted, however, that 5-HT2 receptors have also been located on GABAergic interneurons, thus some of the effects of psilocybin on the dopamine system may be mediated, indirectly, through its modulation of the GABA system (Marek and Aghajanian 1994; Yamamoto et al. 1995). Certainly, such speculation needs substantial corroborative evidence and carefully designed mechanistic studies. Nevertheless, the present findings suggest that stimulation of 5-HT, presumably 5-HT2 and 5-HT1 receptors, can lead to an increase in striatal dopamine efflux which may contribute to the psychotomimetic effects of psilocybin. Of particular interest to the present study are indications that abnormalities in the number of 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors have been found in the frontal cortex, nucleus accumbens, striatum, and hippocampi of schizophrenic patients (Mita et al. 1986; Arora and Meltzer 1991; Joyce et al. 1993; Laruelle et al. 1993; Gurevich and Joyce 1997). Thus, the present data also support further evaluation of the 5-HT system in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia (Meltzer 1991).