Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Conservation of Energy in Radiation Processes

Abstract

AT the beginning of this year, R. Shankland1 reported experiments on the Compton effect which indicated a breakdown of the conservation laws in radiation processes and a reversal to the type of theory put forward by Bohr, Kramers and Slater in 1924. According to the latter, light-quanta have no existence, and energy is only statistically conserved in the interaction of matter and radiation. In view of the difficulties of accepting Shankland's results—it was pointed out by one of the present writers in an earlier note2 that they ” run counter to the Uncertainty Principle”—we have carried out certain experiments with a view of testing further the points at issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Phys. Rev., 49, 8 (1936).

  2. NATURE, 137, 614 (1936).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bothe and Maier-Leibnitz, Göttingen Nacht., 10, 127 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Jacobsen, NATURE, 138, 25 (1936). Present results were reported at Physics Conference, Zurich, July 1.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WILLIAMS, E., PICKUP, E. Conservation of Energy in Radiation Processes. Nature 138, 461–462 (1936). https://doi.org/10.1038/138461a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/138461a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing