Letter | Published:

Research and the Library

Subjects

Abstract

WE are in substantial agreement with the views expressed by Mr. G. E. H. Foxon in NATURE of June 8, except that he has misinterpreted the penultimate paragraph of our original article1, as reference to it will show that it was not our intention to burke scientific debates. The inclusion of these would not be overlooked by an editorial board of the calibre envisaged by us. Our point was that votes of thanks and such superfluous matter or padding should be excised.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    NATURE, 135, 664, April 27, 1935.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.

About this article

Publication history

  • Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/1351077c0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.