Atomic Theory


I SHOULD have been much disappointed if Dr. Tutin had taken my review of his book lying down. Indeed he has not done so, but he has added little or nothing in his reply to his development of the A atom. Paragraphs (l)–(4) merely reiterate what he claims that the A atom has done and the R-B atom has not. These claims are frankly preposterous.


Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

FOWLER, K. Atomic Theory. Nature 134, 24 (1934).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.