Abstract
I AM grateful to my friend Mr. Harold Peake for dealing with this question of the term ‘Mesolithic’ so fully. Unfortunately, I am unable to doubt that this term has now received wide acceptance among archæologists. But this cannot alter the fact, that from the point of view of a correct nomenclature it must be wrong to designate as mesolithic specimens which are agreed on all sides to be referable to the latter part of the Stone Age. It is as if I were to be asked to acquiesce in calling mid-Victorian, circumstances, or objects, relating to the end of that epoch. I cannot believe that it is beyond the wit of archæologists to find some term, descriptive of the period and artefacts in question, which will not violate common-sense. Mr. Peake will perhaps allow me to express doubts as to whether I am the only archæologist who objects to the term mesolithic. But, even if his dire prophecy is true, I am cheerfully prepared to remain in a minority of one in this matter.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MOIR, J. The Term Mesolithic. Nature 133, 260 (1934). https://doi.org/10.1038/133260a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/133260a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.