Letter | Published:

Part-Absorption in X-Rays

Nature volume 128, pages 224225 (08 August 1931) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

IN connexion with the experiments of one of us (B. R.) on the part-absorption in X-rays,1 the results of other workers on the same subject are conflicting. While Cork,2 Lindsay,3 and Van der Tuuk4 report negative results, Bhargava and Mukherjee5 confirm our results so far as the part-absorption lines are concerned. It seems to us that the conflicting results obtained by different authors are simply due to the thickness of the absorption screens used by them in their experiments.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    NATURE, May 17, June 7, Sept. 13, 1930.

  2. 2.

    Comptes rendus, Jan. 1931.

  3. 3.

    NATURE, Feb. 28, 1931.

  4. 4.

    Naturwissen., April 3, 1931.

  5. 5.

    NATURE, Feb. 21, Feb. 28, 1931.

  6. 6.

    NATURE, June 7, 1930; Zeit. f. Phys., Bd. 66.

  7. 7.

    Zeit. f. Phys., Bd. 66.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. University College of Science, 92 Upper Circular Road, Calcutta, May 1.

    • B. B. RAY
    •  & B. B. DATTA

Authors

  1. Search for B. B. RAY in:

  2. Search for B. B. DATTA in:

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/128224b0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.