Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Books Received
  • Published:

[Book Reviews]

Abstract

THE issues raised in this book are too important to be discussed casually in a few lines. The relation between religion and science is, of course, a very old problem. But the amazing developments of physical theories are apt to give a new setting to it. When scientific workers find themselves in a philosophical mood, they indulge in offering their readers some tentative suggestions about the theological extension of their particular science. So we get Eddington's scientific approach to religion, Huxley's religion without God, Jeans's mathematical God, and perhaps Einstein's Spinozistic God. Philosophers should be thankful to men of science for such indications; the more so as they are not forced upon one by their authors with the same mental pressure often displayed by metaphysicists. Because scientific workers do not present their conclusions in this respect as binding and final, philosophers must return the courtesy and treat them, for example, in the same dignified spirit as that shown in Sir Arthur Eddington's reply to Mr. Cohen's criticisms. His case would have been perhaps stronger if Mr. Cohen had shown more modesty and less partisanship in his statements and in his professional defence of materialism and free thought. But when he starts off by pro-claiming that after his criticisms of “very many” books by scientific workers aiming at reconciliation of science and religion, their authors decided generally that “discretion was the better part” and that “silence in their case spelt safety”, one may pertinently wonder whether Mr. Cohen should be taken as a safe guide in philosophy, and whether he is qualified to pay compliments to that section of the Christian clergy whom he denounces as “dishonest” for acclaiming these men of science as being witnesses on behalf of God.

God and the Universe: Eddington, Jeans, Huxley and Einstein.

Chapman Cohen. With a Reply by Prof. A. S. Eddington. (Issued by the Secular Society, Ltd.) Pp. 133. (London: The Pioneer Press, n.d.) Paper, 2s.; cloth, 3s.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

G., T. [Book Reviews]. Nature 127, 811–812 (1931). https://doi.org/10.1038/127811b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/127811b0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing