Letter | Published:

The Meaning of Existence

Naturevolume 127page339 (1931) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

I DO not know whether anyone has directed attention to the striking agreement of the conclusion of “The Mysterious Universe” with the final form in which Kant expressed his conclusion concerning the nature of the objective world in the “Critique of Judgment”. My particular reference is to Remarks 1 and 2 appended to the 57th Section. In this passage Kant makes the distinction between the Æsthetic Idea and the Rational Idea, and it marks the transition from the consideration of the æsthetic judgment of taste to that of the teleological judgment of purpose in Nature. But the real significance of the passage is seen to lie in Kant's complete grasp of the relation between the intuitive knowledge of the world in sense perception and the objective knowledge of the world in scientific reasoning. It is this which makes Kant's theory so relevant to the modern scientific interpretation of physical reality.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. University of Southern California, School of Philosophy, Los Angeles

    • H. WILDON CARR

Authors

  1. Search for H. WILDON CARR in:

About this article

Publication history

Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/127339a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.