Abstract
BEFORE commenting on the issues of scientific interest raised in the letter (NATURE, June 16, p. 940) entitled “The Nierenstein Reaction,” we would point out that it is not suggested that the results of Nierenstein and his co-workers cannot be corroborated. Up to the present time, however, we have failed to corroborate them in the course of numerous attempted repetitions of various examples; moreover, we do not find that Arndt's recent work confirms that of Nierenstein in this field.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BRADLEY, W., ROBINSON, R. The Nierenstein Reaction. Nature 122, 130–131 (1928). https://doi.org/10.1038/122130a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/122130a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
