Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Paper
  • Published:

A small molecule Smac-mimic compound induces apoptosis and sensitizes TRAIL- and etoposide-induced apoptosis in breast cancer cells

Abstract

Inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP) suppresses apoptosis through binding and inhibiting active caspases-3, -7 and -9 via its baculoviral IAP repeat (BIR) domains. During apoptosis the caspase inhibition by IAPs can be negatively regulated by a mitochondrial protein second mitochondrial-derived activator of caspase (Smac). Smac physically interacts with multiple IAPs and relieves their inhibitory effect on caspases-3, -7 and -9. Recently, a small molecule Smac-mimic compound (Smac-mimic), which potentiates TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α mediated cell death in glioblastoma T98G cells and HeLa cells, was identified and characterized. To determine the efficacy of this compound in breast cancer cells, we first measured protein expression of three IAPs: XIAP, cIAP-1, and cIAP-2 in nine independent breast cancer cell lines. Three cell lines were chosen: a high IAPs expressing line MDA-MB-231, and two low IAPs expressing lines, T47D and MDA-MB-453. The cell lines were tested for their sensitivity to Smac-mimic alone or in combination with TRAIL or etoposide. Acting alone, Smac-mimic was quite potent with a cytotoxic IC50 of 3.8 nM in high IAPs expressing MDA-MB-231 cells, but was inactive at a much higher concentration in low IAPs expressing T47D and MDA-MB-453 cells. In fact, as low as 2.5 nM of Smac-mimic alone was sufficient to activate caspase-3 and induce apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 cells. In combinational treatments with TRAIL or etoposide, Smac-mimic significantly sensitized cells to growth suppression in MDA-MB-231 cells, but to a lesser extent in T47D and MDA-MB-453 cells. Furthermore, it significantly synergized MDA-MB-231, but not T47D cells to apoptosis induced by either TRAIL or etoposide. Thus, in these cell lines, Smac-mimic acts in an apparent IAPs dependent manner to induce apoptosis alone as well as sensitizes breast cancer cells to TRAIL or etoposide induced apoptosis via caspase-3 activation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BIR:

baculovirual IAP repeat

IAPs:

inhibitors of apoptosis protein

Smac:

second mitochondrial-derived activator of caspase

TNF:

tumor necrosis factor

TRAIL:

TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand

References

  • Arnt CR, Chiorean MV, Heldebrant MP, Gores GJ and Kaufmann SH . (2002). J. Biol. Chem., 277, 44236–44243.

  • Boyce M, Bryant KF, Jousse C, Long K, Harding HP, Scheuner D, Kaufman RJ, Ma D, Coen DM, Ron D and Yuan J . (2005). Science, 307, 935–939.

  • Cao C, Mu Y, Hallahan DE and Lu B . (2004). Oncogene, 23, 7047–7052.

  • Chai J, Du C, Wu JW, Kyin S, Wang X and Shi Y . (2000). Nature, 406, 855–862.

  • Chai J, Shiozaki E, Srinivasula SM, Wu Q, Dataa P, Alnemri ES and Shi Y . (2001). Cell, 104, 769–780.

  • Deveraux QL and Reed JC . (1999). Genes Dev., 13, 239–252.

  • Duan H, Wang Y, Aviram M, Swaroop M, Loo JA, Bian J, Tian Y, Mueller T, Bisgaier CL and Sun Y . (1999). Mol. Cell. Biol., 19, 3145–3155.

  • Earnshaw WC, Martins LM and Kaufmann SH . (1999). Ann. Rev. Biochem., 68, 383–424.

  • Fulda S, Wick W, Weller M and Debatin KM . (2002). Nat. Med., 8, 808–815.

  • Garber K . (2005). Nat. Biotechnol., 23, 409–411.

  • Hengartner MO . (2000). Nature, 407, 770–776.

  • Huang Y, Park YC, Rich RL, Segal D, Myszka DG and Wu H . (2001). Cell, 104, 781–790.

  • Kerr JF . (1971). J. Pathol., 105, 13–20.

  • Kerr JF, Wyllie AH and Currie AR . (1972). Br. J. Cancer, 26, 239–257.

  • Li L, Thomas RM, Suzuki H, De Brabander JK, Wang X and Harran PG . (2004). Science, 305, 1471–1474.

  • Lima RT, Martins LM, Guimaraes JE, Sambade C and Vasconcelos MH . (2004). Cancer Gene Ther., 11, 309–316.

  • Makin G and Hickman JA . (2000). Cell Tissue Res., 301, 143–152.

  • McManus DC, Lefebvre CA, Cherton-Horvat G, St-Jean M, Kandimalla ER, Agrawal S, Morris SJ, Durkin JP and Lacasse EC . (2004). Oncogene, 23, 8105–8117.

  • McNeish IA, Bell S, McKay T, Tenev T, Marani M and Lemoine NR . (2003). Exp. Cell Res., 286, 186–198.

  • Nguyen JT and Wells JA . (2003). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 7533–7538.

  • Oost TK, Sun C, Armstrong RC, Al-Assaad AS, Betz SF, Deckwerth TL, Ding H, Elmore SW, Meadows RP, Olejniczak ET, Oleksijew A, Oltersdorf T, Rosenberg SH, Shoemaker AR, Tomaselli KJ, Zou H and Fesik SW . (2004). J. Med. Chem., 47, 4417–4426.

  • Pardo OE, Lesay A, Arcaro A, Lopes R, Ng BL, Warne PH, McNeish IA, Tetley TD, Lemoine NR, Mehmet H, Seckl MJ and Downward J . (2003). Mol. Cell. Biol., 23, 7600–7610.

  • Reed JC . (2003). Cancer Cell, 3, 17–22.

  • Riedl SJ, Renatus M, Schwarzenbacher R, Zhou Q, Sun C, Fesik SW, Liddington RC and Salvesen GS . (2001). Cell, 104, 791–800.

  • Salvesen GS and Duckett CS . (2002). Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol., 3, 401–410.

  • Scott FL, Denault JB, Riedl SJ, Shin H, Renatus M and Salvesen GS . (2005). EMBO J., 24, 645–655.

  • Srinivasula SM, Hegde R, Saleh A, Datta P, Shiozaki E, Chai J, Lee RA, Robbins PD, Fernandes-Alnemri T, Shi Y and Alnemri ES . (2001). Nature, 410, 112–116.

  • Sun C, Cai M, Gunasekera AH, Meadows RP, Wang H, Chen J, Zhang H, Wu W, Xu N, Ng SC and Fesik SW . (1999). Nature, 401, 818–822.

  • Sun Y, Bian J, Wang Y and Jacobs C . (1997). Oncogene, 14, 385–393.

  • Thompson CB . (1995). Science, 267, 1456–1462.

  • Wolf BB, Schuler M, Echeverri F and Green DR . (1999). J. Biol. Chem., 274, 30651–30656.

  • Wu G, Chai J, Suber TL, Wu JW, Du C, Wang X and Shi Y . (2000). Nature, 408, 1008–1012.

  • Wyllie AH . (1980). Nature, 284, 555–556.

  • Wyllie AH, Kerr JF and Currie AR . (1980). Int. Rev. Cytol., 68, 251–306.

  • Yang L, Cao Z, Yan H and Wood WC . (2003a). Cancer Res., 63, 6815–6824.

  • Yang L, Mashima T, Sato S, Mochizuki M, Sakamoto H, Yamori T, Oh-Hara T and Tsuruo T . (2003b). Cancer Res., 63, 831–837.

  • Yang YL and Li XM . (2000). Cell Res., 10, 169–177.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Xiaodong Wang at Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center for the Smac-mimic compound and Dr Stephen Ethier at Wayne State University for the breast cancer cell lines, SUM149, SUM102 and SUM52. This work is supported by DOD Breast Cancer Concept Award (BC032492) granted to YS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Sun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bockbrader, K., Tan, M. & Sun, Y. A small molecule Smac-mimic compound induces apoptosis and sensitizes TRAIL- and etoposide-induced apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Oncogene 24, 7381–7388 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208888

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208888

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links