Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Paper
  • Published:

Effect of Herceptin on the development and progression of skeletal metastases in a xenograft model of human breast cancer

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 19 January 2006

Abstract

We examined the effects of Herceptin, a bioengineered monoclonal antibody directed against Her-2/neu oncogene on skeletal metastasis using a xenograft model of breast cancer. Treatment of Her-2 overexpressing human breast cancer cells BT-474 with Herceptin caused a dose-dependent decrease in cell proliferation. In in vivo studies, BT-474 cells (1 × 105) were injected into the left ventricle of female BALB/c nu/nu mice. Intraperitoneal (i.p.) infusion of Herceptin (1 mg/kg twice a week for 5 weeks) from the day of tumor cell inoculation or at the time of radiologically detectable skeletal metastasis either slowed the development or prevented the progression of skeletal metastasis as compared to control groups of animals receiving nonspecific IgG. Bone histological analysis of long bones showed the ability of Herceptin to reduce the ratio of tumor volume to bone volume as well as mitotic index, effects that were more pronounced when Herceptin treatment was initiated from the day of tumor cell inoculation. While immunohistochemical analysis of long bones showed no difference in the production of Her-2, phosphorylated (P) Her-2 and MAPK, a significantly lower level of P-MAPK was seen in bones of Herceptin treated animals. These studies demonstrate the ability of Herceptin to inhibit the development and abrogate the progression of skeletal metastases associated with breast cancer by blocking the HER-2-mediated signaling pathways.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adewale A, Nui Y, Cherlet T, Snell L, Watson PH and Murphy LC . (2002). Clin. Cancer Res., 8, 1747–1753.

  • Baselga J, Norton L, Albanell J, Kim Y-M and Mendelsohn J . (1998). Cancer Res., 58, 2825–2831.

  • Bell R . (2002). Oncology, 63 (Suppl 1), 39–46.

  • Bendre MS, Gaddy-Kurten D, Mon-Foote T, Akel NS, Skinner RA, Nicholas RW and Suva LJ . (2002). Cancer Res., 62, 5571–5579.

  • Bernstein L . (2002). J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia, 7, 3–15.

  • Cheng JD, Rieger PT, von Mehren M, Adams GP and Weiner LM . (2000). Semin. Oncol. Nurs., 16 (Supp1), 2–12.

  • DiGiovanna MP, Lerman MA, Coffey RJ, Muller WJ, Cardiff RD and Stern DF . (1998). Oncogene, 17, 1877–1884.

  • Duivenvoorden WC, Popovic SV, Lhotak S, Seidlitz E, Hirte HW, Tozer RG and Singh G . (2002). Cancer Res., 62, 1588–1591.

  • El Abdaimi K, Dion N, Papavasiliou V, Cardinal PE, Binderup L, Goltzman D, Ste-Marie LG and Kremer R . (2000). Cancer Res., 60, 4412–4418.

  • Esteva FJ, Valero V, Pusztai L, Beohnke-Michaud L, Buzdar AU and Hortobagyi GN . (2001). Oncologist, 6, 133–146.

  • Klijn JG, Look MP, Portengen H, Alexieva-Figusch J, van Putten WL and Foekens JA . (1994). Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 29, 73–83.

  • Kurebayashi J . (2001). Breast Cancer, 8, 45–51.

  • Lacroix M and Leclercq G . (2004). Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 83, 249–289.

  • Margolese TG, Hortobagy GN and Buchholz TA . (2003). Cancer Medicine 6th edn BC Decker Inc.: Canada, pp. 1879–1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masood S and Bui MM . (2002). Microsc. Res. Tech., 59, 102–108.

  • Mayfield S, Vaughn JP and Kute TE . (2001). Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 70, 123–129.

  • Moasser MM, Basso A, Averbuch SD and Rosen N . (2001). Cancer Res., 61, 7184–7188.

  • Mundy GR . (2002). Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2, 584–593.

  • Normanno N, Campiglio M, De Luca A, Somenzi G, Maiello M, ciardiello F, Gianni L, Salomon DS and Menard S . (2002). Ann. Oncol., 13, 65–72.

  • Park JW, Hong K, Kirpotin DB, Colbern G, Shalaby R, Baselga J, Shao Y, Nielsen UB, Marks JD, Moore D, Papahadjopoulos D and Benz CC . (2002). Clin. Cancer Res., 8, 1172–1181.

  • Pluijm G, Lowik C and Papapoulos S . (2000). Cancer Treat. Rev., 26, 11–27.

  • Rabbani SA, Khalili P, Arakelian A, Pizzi H, Chen G and Goltzman D . (2005). Endocrinology, 146, 2885–2894.

  • Roodman D . (2003). Cancer, 97 (Supp l), 733–738.

  • Ross JS and Fletcher JA . (1998). Stem Cells, 16, 413–428.

  • Shafie SM and Grantham FH . (1981). J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 67, 51–56.

  • Sliwowski MX, Lofgren JA, Lewis GD, Hotaling TE, Fendly BM and Fox JA . (1999). Semin. Oncol., 26, 60–70.

  • Yakes FM, Chinratanalab W, Ritter CA, King W, Seelig S and Arteaga CL . (2002). Cancer Res., 62, 4132–4141.

  • Yarden Y . (2001). Oncology, 61 (Suppl 2), 1–13.

  • Zhou BP and Hung MC . (2003). Semin. Oncol., 30 (Suppl 16), 38–48.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Ida Khalili, Department of Radiology, McGill University Health Centre for carefully reviewing all X-rays. This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Grant MOP 10630 to SA Rabbani.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shafaat A Rabbani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khalili, P., Arakelian, A., Chen, G. et al. Effect of Herceptin on the development and progression of skeletal metastases in a xenograft model of human breast cancer. Oncogene 24, 6657–6666 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208790

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208790

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links