Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Paper
  • Published:

Stress-specific signatures: expression profiling of p53 wild-type and -null human cells

Abstract

Gene expression responses of human cell lines exposed to a diverse set of stress agents were compared by cDNA microarray hybridization. The B-lymphoblastoid cell line TK6 (p53 wild-type) and its p53-null derivative, NH32, were treated in parallel to facilitate investigation of p53-dependent responses. RNA was extracted 4 h after the beginning of treatment when no notable decrease in cell viability was evident in the cultures. Gene expression signatures were defined that discriminated between four broad general mechanisms of stress agents: Non-DNA-damaging stresses (heat shock, osmotic shock, and 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate), agents causing mainly oxidative stress (arsenite and hydrogen peroxide), ionizing radiations (neutron and γ-ray exposures), and other DNA-damaging agents (ultraviolet radiation, methyl methanesulfonate, adriamycin, camptothecin, and cis-Platinum(II)diammine dichloride (cisplatin)). Within this data set, non-DNA-damaging stresses could be discriminated from all DNA-damaging stresses, and profiles for individual agents were also defined. While DNA-damaging stresses showed a strong p53-dependent element in their responses, no discernible p53-dependent responses were triggered by the non-DNA-damaging stresses. A set of 16 genes did exhibit a robust p53-dependent pattern of induction in response to all nine DNA-damaging agents, however.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amundson SA, Bittner M, Chen YD, Trent J, Meltzer P and Fornace Jr AJ . (1999). Oncogene, 18, 3666–3672.

  • Amundson SA, Lee RA, Koch-Paiz CA, Bittner ML, Meltzer P, Trent JM and Fornace AJJ . (2003). Mol. Cancer Res., 1, 445–452.

  • Amundson SA, Shahab S, Bittner M, Meltzer P, Trent J and Fornace Jr AJ . (2000). Radiat. Res., 154, 342–346.

  • Beyersmann D . (2002). Toxicol. Lett., 127, 63–68.

  • Bulavin D, Saito SI, Hollander MC, Sakaguchi K, Anderson CW, Appella E and Fornace Jr AJ . (1999). EMBO J., 18, 6845–6854.

  • Burczynski ME, McMillian M, Ciervo J, Li L, Parker JB, Dunn RTn, Hicken S, Farr S and Johnson MD . (2000). Toxicol. Sci., 58, 399–415.

  • Burg MB, Kwon ED and Kultz D . (1996). FASEB J., 10, 1598–1606.

  • Chen Y, Dougherty ER and Bittner ML . (1997). J. Biomed. Opt., 2, 364–374.

  • Chen Y, Kamat V, Dougherty ER, Bittner ML, Meltzer PS and Trent JM . (2002). Bioinformatics, 18, 1207–1215.

  • Chomczynski P and Sacchi N . (1987). Anal. Biochem., 162, 156–159.

  • Chuang YY, Chen Q, Brown JP, Sedivy JM and Liber HL . (1999). Cancer Res., 59, 3073–3076.

  • DeLuca JG, Weinstein L and Thilly WG . (1983). Mutat. Res., 107, 347–370.

  • DeRisi J, Penland L, Brown PO, Bittner ML, Meltzer PS, Ray M, Chen Y, Su YA and Trent JM . (1996). Nat. Genet., 14, 457–460.

  • Goodhead DT . (1989). Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 56, 623–634.

  • Hamadeh HK, Bushel PR, Jayadev S, Martin K, DiSorbo O, Sieber S, Bennett L, Tennant R, Stoll R, Barrett JC, Blanchard K, Paules RS and Afshari CA . (2002a). Toxicol. Sci., 67, 219–231.

  • Hamadeh HK, Trouba KJ, Amin RP, Afshari CA and Germolec D . (2002b). Toxicol. Sci., 69, 306–316.

  • Hildesheim J, Bulavin DV, Anver MR, Alvord WG, Hollander MC, Vardanian L and Fornace Jr A . (2002). Cancer Res., 62, 7305–7315.

  • Hosack DA, Dennis GJ, Sherman BT, Lane HC and Lempicki RA . (2003). Genome. Biol., 4, R70.

  • Jelinsky SA, Estep P, Church GM and Samson LD . (2000). Mol. Cell. Biol., 20, 8157–8167.

  • Jolly C and Morimoto RI . (2000). J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 92, 1564–1572.

  • Kelsey KT, Xia F, Bodell WJ, Spengler JD, Christiani DC, Dockery DW and Liber HL . (1994). Environ. Res., 64, 18–25.

  • Koch-Paiz CA, Amundson SA, Bittner ML, Meltzer PS and Fornace Jr AJ . (2004). Mutat. Res., 549, 65–78.

  • Koch-Paiz CA, Momenan R, Amundson SA, Lamoreaux E and Fornace Jr AJ . (2000). Biotechniques, 29, 708–714.

  • Koizumi S and Yamada H . (2003). J. Occup. Health, 45, 331–334.

  • Kopf-Maier P and Muhlhausen SK . (1992). Chem. Biol. Interact., 82, 295–316.

  • Kultz D, Madhany S and Burg MB . (1998). J. Biol. Chem., 273, 13645–13651.

  • McClellan M, Kievit P, Auersperg N and Rodland K . (1999). Exp. Cell Res., 246, 471–479.

  • Park WY, Hwang CI, Im CN, Kang MJ, Woo JH, Kim JH, Kim YS, Kim JH, Kim H, Kim KA, Yu HJ, Lee SJ, Lee YS and Seo JS . (2002). Oncogene, 21, 8521–8528.

  • Rea MA, Gregg JP, Qin Q, Phillips MA and Rice RH . (2003). Carcinogenesis, 24, 747–756.

  • Shimizu N, Ohta M, Fujiwara C, Sagara J, Mochizuki N, Oda T and Utiyama H . (1991). J. Biol. Chem., 266, 12157–12161.

  • Skopek TR, Liber HL, Penman BW and Thilly WG . (1978). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 84, 411–416.

  • Steen AM, Meyer KG and Recio L . (1997). Mutagenesis, 12, 359–364.

  • Zhan L, Sakamoto H, Sakuraba M, Wu de S, Zhang LS, Suzuki T, Hayashi M and Honma M . (2004). Mutat. Res., 557, 1–6.

  • Zhan Q, Alamo Jr I, Yu K, Boise LH, O'Connor PM and Fornace Jr AJ . (1996a). Oncogene, 13, 2287–2293.

  • Zhan Q, Fan S, Smith ML, Bae I, Yu K, Alamo Jr I, O'Connor PM and Fornace Jr AJ . (1996b). DNA Cell Biol., 15, 805–815.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to S Marino and G Randers-Pehrson for operation of the Radiological Research Accelerator Facility (RARAF) van de Graaff. RARAF is an NIH supported Resource Center through Grants EB-002033 (NIBIB) and CA-37967 (NCI). We thank the Division of Computational Bioscience of the Center for Information Technology at the National Institutes of Health for providing computational resources for this study. Support from the DOE Low Dose Radiation Program, ER 63308, is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert J Fornace Jr.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on Oncogene website (http://www.nature.com/onc)

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amundson, S., Do, K., Vinikoor, L. et al. Stress-specific signatures: expression profiling of p53 wild-type and -null human cells. Oncogene 24, 4572–4579 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208653

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208653

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links