Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Paper
  • Published:

The RNA binding protein Sam68 is acetylated in tumor cell lines, and its acetylation correlates with enhanced RNA binding activity

Abstract

Sam68 (Src-associated in mitosis; 68 kDa) is a member of the STAR (signal transduction and activation of RNA) family of KH domain-containing RNA binding proteins. Accumulating evidence suggests that it plays an important role in cell cycle control. Tyrosine phosphorylation by Src family kinases and breast tumor kinase can negatively regulate its RNA binding activity. To date, there are no reports of a factor, such as a phosphatase, which can positively regulate Sam68 association with RNA. Acetylation is a reversible post-translational modification known to influence the activity of DNA binding proteins. However, acetylation of a cellular RNA binding protein as a mechanism for regulating its activity has not yet been reported. Here we demonstrate Sam68 to be acetylated in vivo. A screen of several human mammary epithelial cell lines revealed variations in Sam68 acetylation. Interestingly, the highest level of acetylation was found in tumorigenic breast cancer cell lines. The screen also showed a positive correlation between Sam68 acetylation and its ability to bind RNA. The acetyltransferase CBP was shown to acetylate Sam68 and enhance its binding to poly(U) RNA. These results suggest that Sam68 association with RNA substrates may be positively regulated by acetylation, and that enhanced acetylation and RNA binding activity of Sam68 may play a role in tumor cell proliferation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ait-Si-Ali S, Polesskaya A, Filleur S, Ferreira R, Duquet A, Robin P, Vervish A, Trouche D, Cabon F and Harel-Bellan A . (2000). Oncogene, 19, 2430–2437.

  • Arning S, Gruter P, Bilbe G and Kramer A . (1996). RNA, 2, 794–810.

  • Bannister AJ and Kouzarides T . (1996). Nature, 384, 641–643.

  • Bannister AJ, Miska EA, Gorlich D and Kouzarides T . (2000). Curr. Biol., 10, 467–470.

  • Barlat I, Maurier F, Duchesne M, Guitard E, Tocque B and Schweighoffer F . (1997). J. Biol. Chem., 272, 3129–3132.

  • Boyes J, Byfield P, Nakatani Y, Ogryzko V, Zhang W and Bieker JJ . (1998). Nature, 396, 594–598.

  • Chan HM, Krstic-Demonacos M, Smith L, Demonacos C and La Thangue NB . (2001). Nat. Cell Biol., 3, 667–674.

  • Chen T, Damaj BB, Herrera C, Lasko P and Richard S . (1997). Mol. Cell Biol., 17, 5707–5718.

  • Chen T and Richard S . (1998). Mol. Cell Biol., 18, 4863–4871.

  • Coyle JH, Guzik BW, Bor YC, Jin L, Eisner-Smerage L, Taylor SJ, Rekosh D and Hammarskjold ML . (2003). Mol. Cell Biol., 23, 92–103.

  • Cruz-Alvarez M and Pellicer A . (1987). J. Biol. Chem., 262, 13377–13380.

  • Derry JJ, Richard S, Valderrama CH, Ye X, Vasioukhin V, Cochrane AW, Chen T and Tyner AL . (2000). Mol. Cell Biol., 20, 6114–6126.

  • Di Fruscio M, Chen T and Richard S . (1999). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 2710–2715.

  • Fumagalli S, Totty NF, Hsuan JJ and Courtneidge SA . (1994). Nature, 368, 871–874.

  • Grossman JS, Meyer MI, Wang YC, Mulligan GJ, Kobayashi R and Helfman DM . (1998). RNA, 4, 613–625.

  • Gu W and Roeder RG . (1997). Cell, 90, 595–606.

  • Hartmann AM, Nayler O, Schwaiger FW, Obermeier A and Stamm S . (1999). Mol. Biol. Cell, 10, 3909–3926.

  • Hong W, Resnick RJ, Rakowski C, Shalloway D, Taylor SJ and Blobel GA . (2002). Mol. Cancer Res., 1, 48–55.

  • Ishidate T, Yoshihara S, Kawasaki Y, Roy BC, Toyoshima K and Akiyama T . (1997). FEBS Lett., 409, 237–241.

  • Jones AR and Schedl T . (1995). Genes Dev., 9, 1491–1504.

  • Kiernan RE, Vanhulle C, Schiltz L, Adam E, Xiao H, Maudoux F, Calomme C, Burny A, Nakatani Y, Jeang KT, Benkirane M and Van Lint C . (1999). EMBO J., 18, 6106–6118.

  • Kouzarides T . (2000). EMBO J., 19, 1176–1179.

  • L'Hernault SW and Rosenbaum JL . (1985). Biochemistry, 24, 473–478.

  • Lin Q, Taylor SJ and Shalloway D . (1997). J. Biol. Chem., 272, 27274–27280.

  • Li QH, Haga I, Shimizu T, Itoh M, Kurosaki T and Fujisawa J . (2002). FEBS Lett, 525, 145–150.

  • Mandal M, Vadlamudi R, Nguyen D, Wang R-A, Costa L, Bagheri-Yarmand R, Mendelsohn J and Kumar R . (2001). J. Biol. Chem., 276, 9699–9704.

  • Martinez-Balbas MA, Bauer UM, Nielsen SJ, Brehm A and Kouzarides T . (2000). EMBO J., 19, 662–671.

  • Matter N, Herrlich P and Konig H . (2002). Nature, 420, 691–695.

  • Mueller F, Bommer M, Lacher U, Ruhland C, Stagge V, Adler G, Gress TM and Seufferlein T . (2003). Br. J. Cancer, 88, 699–701.

  • Perrotti D and Calabretta B . (2002). Oncogene, 21, 8577–8583.

  • Reddy TR, Suhasini M, Xu W, Yeh LY, Yang JP, Wu J, Artzt K and Wong-Staal F . (2002). J. Biol. Chem., 277, 5778–5784.

  • Reddy TR, Tang H, Xu W and Wong-Staal F . (2000). Oncogene, 19, 3570–3575.

  • Reddy TR, Xu W, Mau JK, Goodwin CD, Suhasini M, Tang H, Frimpong K, Rose DW and Wong-Staal F . (1999). Nat. Med., 5, 635–642.

  • Resnick RJ, Taylor SJ, Lin Q and Shalloway D . (1997). Oncogene, 15, 1247–1253.

  • Siomi H, Siomi MC, Nussbaum RL and Dreyfuss G . (1993). Cell, 74, 291–298.

  • Soros VB, Carvajal HV, Richard S and Cochrane AW . (2001). J. Virol., 75, 8203–8215.

  • Sterner DE and Berger SL . (2000). Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 64, 435–459.

  • Stoss O, Olbrich M, Hartmann AM, Konig H, Memmott J, Andreadis A and Stamm S . (2001). J. Biol. Chem., 276, 8665–8673.

  • Takemaru KI and Moon RT . (2000). J. Cell Biol., 149, 249–254.

  • Taylor SJ and Shalloway D . (1994). Nature, 368, 867–871.

  • Vernet C and Artzt K . (1997). Trends Genet., 13, 479–484.

  • Vervoorts J, Luscher-Firzlaff JM, Rottmann S, Lilischkis R, Walsemann G, Dohmann K, Austen M and Luscher B . (2003). EMBO Rep., 4, 484–490.

  • Vogel LB and Fujita DJ . (1995). J. Biol. Chem., 270, 2506–2511.

  • Wang LL, Richard S and Shaw AS . (1995). J. Biol. Chem., 270, 2010–2013.

  • Wu J, Zhou L, Tonissen K, Tee R and Artzt K . (1999). J. Biol. Chem., 274, 29202–29210.

  • Zhang W and Bieker JJ . (1998). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95, 9855–9860.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank T Kouzarides for providing the GST-CBP (HAT domain) plasmid and R Goodman for the mouse CBP-HA cDNA. We also thank J Bjorge for critical reading of the manuscript and technical advice. This work was supported by grants to DJF from the National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC), the Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), and the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation (AB/NWT Chapter). IB was supported by a CIHR Doctoral Research Award and an Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR) Studentship Award; AJ was supported by studentship awards from CIHR and AHFMR; DJF is a Scientist of the AHFMR.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ivan Babic or Donald J Fujita.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Babic, I., Jakymiw, A. & Fujita, D. The RNA binding protein Sam68 is acetylated in tumor cell lines, and its acetylation correlates with enhanced RNA binding activity. Oncogene 23, 3781–3789 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207484

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207484

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links