Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Paper
  • Published:

Cyclin-E is a strong predictor of endocrine therapy failure in human breast cancer

Abstract

Recently, cyclin-E was reported to be the most prominent prognostic factor for breast cancer outcome described so far, even surpassing axillary nodal involvement. Earlier studies on the prognostic value of cyclin-E in breast cancer, however, yielded heterogeneous results. Therefore, we set out to confirm and extend these results by quantitative Taqman RT–PCR of cyclin-E levels in 277 resectable breast cancers. Cyclin-E levels were not associated with relapse-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) in the total cohort of patients, or in the subset of patients without involved lymph nodes that were not treated with adjuvant systemic therapy. Besides several classical clinicopathological factors, the interaction between cyclin-E and adjuvant endocrine therapy (P=0.01, HR=3.04, 95% CI: 1.30–7.09) was found to contribute significantly in multivariate analyses. Cyclin-E levels were associated with poor RFS specifically in patients treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy (n=108, P=0.001, HR=4.01, 95% CI: 1.76–9.12), independent of estrogen receptor status. In conclusion, cyclin-E is not a pure prognostic factor in breast cancer, but rather a predictor of failure of endocrine therapy. Differences in literature on the presumed prognostic value of cyclin-E may be due to differences in treatment. Assessment of cyclin-E levels can aid in improving adjuvant treatment selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman DG, Lausen B, Sauerbrei W and Schumacher M . (1994). J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 86, 829–835.

  • Altman DG and Lyman GH . (1998). Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 52, 289–303.

  • Bindels EM, Lallemand F, Balkenende A, Verwoerd D and Michalides R . (2002). Oncogene, 21, 8158–8165.

  • Cox DR . (1972). J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 34, 187–220.

  • Dhillon NK and Mudryj M . (2002). Oncogene, 21, 4626–4634.

  • Donnellan R, Kleinschmidt I and Chetty R . (2001). Hum. Pathol., 32, 89–94.

  • Dulic V, Lees E and Reed SI . (1992). Science, 257, 1958–1961.

  • Foekens JA, Ries C, Look MP, Gippner-Steppert C, Klijn JG and Jochum M . (2003). Cancer Res., 63, 337–341.

  • Harbeck N, Kates RE, Look MP, Meijer-Van Gelder ME, Klijn JG, Kruger A, Kiechle M, Janicke F, Schmitt M and Foekens JA . (2002). Cancer Res., 62, 4617–4622.

  • Kaplan EL and Meier P . (1958). J. Am. Statist. Assoc., 53, 457–481.

  • Keyomarsi K, Conte Jr D, Toyofuku W and Fox MP . (1995). Oncogene, 11, 941–950.

  • Keyomarsi K and Herliczek TW . (1997). Prog. Cell Cycle Res., 3, 171–191.

  • Keyomarsi K and Pardee AB . (1993). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90, 1112–1116.

  • Keyomarsi K, Tucker SL, Buchholz TA, Callister M, Ding Y, Hortobagyi GN, Bedrosian I, Knickerbocker C, Toyofuku W, Lowe M, Herliczek TW and Bacus SS . (2002). N. Engl. J. Med., 347, 1566–1575.

  • Kim HK, Park IA, Heo DS, Noh DY, Choe KJ, Bang YJ and Kim NK . (2001). Eur. J. Surg. Oncol., 27, 464–471.

  • Koff A, Giordano A, Desai D, Yamashita K, Harper JW, Elledge S, Nishimoto T, Morgan DO, Franza BR and Roberts JM . (1992). Science, 257, 1689–1694.

  • Kühling H, Alm P, Olsson H, Ferno M, Baldetorp B, Parwaresch R and Rudolph P . (2003). J. Pathol., 199, 424–431.

  • Mu"ller-Tidow C, Metzger R, Kugler K, Diederichs S, Idos G, Thomas M, Dockhorn-Dworniczak B, Schneider PM, Koeffler HP, Berdel WE and Serve H . (2001). Cancer Res., 61, 647–653.

  • Nielsen NH, Arnerlov C, Emdin SO and Landberg G . (1996). Br. J. Cancer, 74, 874–880.

  • Nielsen NH, Emdin SO, Cajander J and Landberg G . (1997). Oncogene, 14, 295–304.

  • Payton M, Scully S, Chung G and Coats S . (2002). Oncogene, 21, 8529–8534.

  • Porter PL, Malone KE, Heagerty PJ, Alexander GM, Gatti LA, Firpo EJ, Daling JR and Roberts JM . (1997). Nat. Med., 3, 222–225.

  • Porter DC, Zhang N, Danes C, McGahren MJ, Harwell RM, Faruki S and Keyomarsi K . (2001). Mol. Cell. Biol., 21, 6254–6269.

  • Spruck CH, Won KA and Reed SI . (1999). Nature, 401, 297–300.

  • Strohmaier H, Spruck CH, Kaiser P, Won KA, Sangfelt O and Reed SI . (2001). Nature, 413, 316–322.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the contributors, especially the surgeons and internists, of the University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen; Ziekenhuis Apeldoorn, Apeldoorn; Deventer Ziekenhuis, Deventer; Nieuw Spitaal, Zutphen; and Streekziekenhuis Zevenaar, Zevenaar, The Netherlands, for their assistance in collecting the patients' clinical follow-up data. Doorlène van Tienoven and Anneke Geurts-Moespot are acknowledged for their work with collecting and archiving the breast tumor samples. Joop Heuvel is greatly acknowledged for his expert technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul N Span.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Span, P., Tjan-Heijnen, V., Manders, P. et al. Cyclin-E is a strong predictor of endocrine therapy failure in human breast cancer. Oncogene 22, 4898–4904 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1206818

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1206818

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links