Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Paper
  • Published:

Increased error-prone non homologous DNA end-joining – a proposed mechanism of chromosomal instability in Bloom's syndrome

Abstract

BS is an inherited cancer predisposition disorder caused by inactivation of the RecQ family helicase, BLM. One of the defining features of cells from BS individuals is chromosomal instability, characterized by elevated sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs), as well as chromosomal breaks, deletions, and rearrangements. Although the basis for chromosomal instability is poorly understood, there is evidence that chromosomal abnormalities can arise through an alteration in the efficiency or fidelity of DNA double strand break (DSB) repair. Here, we show that BS cells demonstrate aberrant DSB repair mediated by the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway for DNA repair, one of the two main pathways for the repair of DSBs in mammalian cells. Through a comparison of BS cell lines, and a derivative in which the BS phenotype has been reverted by expression of the BLM cDNA, we show that BS cells display aberrant end-joining of DSBs. Importantly, DNA end-joining in BS cells is highly error-prone and frequently results in DNA ligation at distant sites of microhomology, creating large DNA deletions. This aberrant repair is dependent upon the presence of the Ku70/86 heterodimer, a key component in the NHEJ pathway. We propose that aberrant NHEJ is a candidate mechanism for the generation of chromosomal instability in BS.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumann P, West SC . 1998 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 14066–14070

  • Bischoff O, Kim SH, Irving J, Beresten S, Ellis NA, Campisi J . 2001 J. Cell. Biol. 153: 367–380

  • Bradford MM . 1976 Anal. Biochem. 72: 248–254

  • Chakraverty RK, Hickson ID . 1999 Bioessays 21: 286–294

  • Difilipiantonio MJ, Zhu J, Chen HT, Meffre E, Nussenzweig MC, Max EE, Ried T, Nussenzweig A . 2000 Nature 400: 510–513

  • Ellis NA, Groden J, Ye TZ, Straughen J, Lennon DJ, Ciocci S, Proytcheva M, German J . 1995a Cell 83: 655–666

  • Ellis NA, Lennon DJ, Proytcheva M, Alhadeff B, Henderson EE, German J . 1995b Am. J. Hum. Genet. 57: 1019–1027

  • Ellis NA, German J . 1996 Hum. Mol. Genet. 5: 1457–1463

  • Feldmann E, Schmiemann V, Goedecke W, Reichenberger S, Pfeiffer P . 2000 Nuc. Acid Res. 28: 2585–2596

  • Garcia-Higuera I, Taniguchi T, Ganesan S, Meyn MS, Timmers C, Hejna J, Grompe M, D'Andrea AD . 2001 Mol. Cell. 7: 249–262

  • German J, Crippa LP, Bloom D . 1974 Chromosoma 48: 361–366

  • Hanada K, Ukita T, Kohno Y, Saito K, Kato J, Ikeda H . 1997 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 3860–3865

  • Jessberger R, Berg P . 1991 Mol. Cell. Biol. 1: 445–457

  • Karow JK, Chakraverty RK, Hickson ID . 1997 J. Biol. Chem. 272: 30611–30614

  • Karow JK, Wu L, Hickson ID . 2000 Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10: 32–38

  • Khanna KK, Jackson SP . 2001 Nat. Genet. 27: 247–254

  • Kusano K, Johnson-Schlitz DM, Engels WR . 2001 Science 291: 2600–2602

  • Laemmli UK . 1970 Nature 227: 680–685

  • Langlois RG, Bigbee WL, Jensen RH, German J . 1989 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86: 670–674

  • Li L, Eng C, Desnick RJ, German J, Ellis NA . 1983 Mol. Genet. Metab. 64: 286–290

  • Li S, Ting NSY, Zheng L, Chen P-L, Ziv Y, Shiloh Y . 2000 Nature 406: 210–215

  • Moynahan ME, Pierce AJ, Jasin M . 2001 Mol. Cell. 7: 263–267

  • North P, Ganesh A, Thacker J . 1990 Nuc. Acids Res. 18: 6205–6210

  • Pastink A, Eeken JC, Lohman PH . 2001 Mutat. Res. 480–481: 37–50

  • Ray JH, German J . 1983 ed. Liss, New York, NY pp 135–167

  • Richardson C, Jasin M . 2000 Nature 405: 697–700

  • Roth DB, Porter TN, Wilson JH . 1985 Mol. Cell. Biol. 5: 2599–2607

  • Roth DB, Wilson JH . 1986 Mol. Cell. Biol. 6: 4295–4304

  • Runger TM, Kraemer KH . 1989 EMBO J. 8: 1419–1425

  • Tsukamoto Y, Kato J, Ikeda H . 1997 Nature 388: 900–903

  • Welcsh PL, King MC . 2001 Hum. Mol. Genet. 7: 705–713

  • Wu L, Davies SL, Levitt NC, Hickson ID . 2001 J. Biol. Chem. 276: 19375–19381

  • Yamagata K, Kato J, Shimamoto A, Goto M, Furuichi Y, Ikeda H . 1998 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 8733–8738

Download references

Acknowledgements

TJ Gaymes and FV Rassool are supported by the Elimination of Leukaemia Fund. PS North and ID Hickson are supported by the Imperial Cancer Research Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feyruz V Rassool.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gaymes, T., North, P., Brady, N. et al. Increased error-prone non homologous DNA end-joining – a proposed mechanism of chromosomal instability in Bloom's syndrome. Oncogene 21, 2525–2533 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1205331

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1205331

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links