Abstract
WITH regard to the ‘conducting layer’, my objection was to associating it with the name of either Heaviside or Kennelly. It would probably be best, as in the case of the ‘penetrating radiation’, to attach no personal name, but if a name is to be attached, the claims of Balfour Stewart, as I have already explained in the columns of NATURE, seem to me to come first.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
CHREE, C. [Letters to Editor]. Nature 120, 263 (1927). https://doi.org/10.1038/120263b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/120263b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.