Abstract
I HAVE every sympathy with Prof. Sollas and with all geologists whose scientific studies have been impudently challenged by ignorant charlatans. But I have met one honest and modest dowser who never exercised his powers for payment and had no theory as to the nature of the faculty which he believed he possessed. From the cases described by Sir William Barrett, it appears that there are other dowsers who are honest, and it really seems to me that the cause of the dowser's sensations which may lead to the discovery of water is as worthy of study as, say, the polarisation of light that may be used for the microscopic determination of mineral. Theinvestigation may, I think, be better undertaken in either case by specialists who are not concerned with the applications. If there is anything in water-divining, I am sure that it is not occult in the sense of “involving the supernatural, mystical, magical,” and if it be occult in the sense of being “beyond the range of ordinary knowledge” (both definitions are given in the Concise Oxford Dictionary) I only urge that efforts should be made to extend that range as it has been extended in recent years to clear up other obscure phenomena.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MILL, H. Behind the Divining Rod. Nature 119, 458–459 (1927). https://doi.org/10.1038/119458c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/119458c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.