Abstract
REFERRING to the correspondence in NATURE of Feb. 19, p. 277, Mr. H. Belloc writes to say that his statement regarding the impossibility of birds having been evolved from a reptilian form was based on Prof. L. Vialleton's “Membres et Ceintures des Verté brés Tétrapodes” (1924), not, as Sir Arthur Keith had supposed, on that author's “Éléments de Morphologie des Vertébrés ” (1911). The mistake seems to us to be immaterial to the question at issue—namely, “Is Darwinism Dead?”—and we suggest that it would not have occurred if Mr. Belloc had followed the usual practice of giving references to his authorities.
Article PDF
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Is Darwinism Dead?. Nature 119, 427 (1927). https://doi.org/10.1038/119427c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/119427c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.