Abstract
WE are grateful to Sir Flinders Petrie for constituting himself his own reporter (NATURE, Oct. 9, p. 514) in the matter of his reply to our papers at Oxford, for we had at the meeting no opportunity to cover the ground on to which he transferred the argument. On that occasion, we kept studiously to the examination of the prehistoric and the geological evidences for the Caucasian-Solutrean argument. The difficulties we indicated: (1) cultural, (2) distributional, (3) geological, were left unanswered. If Sir Flinders Petrie prefers to argue on historical ground we have here, too, certain comments to make.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
CATON-THOMPSON, G., GARDNER, E. Early Egypt and the Caucasus. Nature 118, 624–625 (1926). https://doi.org/10.1038/118624a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/118624a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.