Research Article | Published:

Huxley and Evolution

Naturevolume 115pages715717 (1925) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

FROM time to time I am asked by students, botanical and other, Was Huxley a great man? Did he do very much? I have a clear answer. I say, if you were a zoologist you could not ask that question, for you would know that Huxley worked over almost the whole face of zoology, and that so much of modern classification and terminology is the product of his logic and “organised common sense” that if we-turn to any text-book earlier than about 1850, when Huxley's operations were beginning, we feel ourselves in zoological pre-history. It is all very well to say that anybody who chose to look could see that starfishes, Holothurians and Medusae should not be classed together and with various other creatures, but neither Lamarck nor Cuvier did notice that Radiata and Polyps were preposterous medleys. Most of the great groups at one time or another came under Huxley's attention, and his instinct for order and his morphological sagacity were so sure that his judgment has been generally accepted by his successors.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    "Collected Essays", vol. 2, 1893, p. 463.

Download references

Authors

  1. Search for W. BATESON in:

About this article

Publication history

Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/115715a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.