Letter | Published:

The Influence of Science

Abstract

THE seeming contradiction in my summary account of the case of Galileo (NATURE, August 5, p. 180), to which Sir Oliver Lodge directs attention in his letter (NATURE, August 26, p. 277), needs an explanation. The great work of Copernicus (1543) was dedicated to a Pope, Paul III; none of the Roman Congregations found any objection to it, and (Whewell, “History of the Inductive Sciences,” I. 418, ed. 1847), says “lectures in support of the heliocentric doctrine were delivered in the ecclesiastical colleges.” This was because of its being taught as a purely scientific doctrine.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.