[Letters to Editor]


IN considering the future of indexing, must not the method of indexing and abstracting depend on the purpose and future utility of abstracts? Do we want the means of manufacturing footnotes by unlimited references, or a guide in research? If for research, does a worker wish—or have time—to look up every reference, or does he want to get the sense of what has been done that will affect him? Can all classes of subjects be treated usefully on a uniform system, or is there any reason for doing so? Can a discrimination be expressed between papers that advance a subject, by new facts or new arrangements, and those that are inconclusive? Should an abstractor be entirely mechanical, or should any criticism be allowed?

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

PETRIE, W. [Letters to Editor]. Nature 107, 550 (1921). https://doi.org/10.1038/107550b0

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.