Abstract
As I said last week (p. 334), and also in the December Phil. Mag. (p. 737), the refractivity μâ1, necessary at every point of a gravitational field to produce the Einstein deflection, is the ratio of the energy of a constant-mass particle fallen there from infinity to the energy of the same particle moving with the speed of light; but it is not permissible to say that the solar gravitational field acts like a lens, for it has no focal length. If the sun were backed by a nebula or any luminous area, the light grazing the rim all round would be brought to a focus at a place seventeen times the distance of Neptune, while light from any larger circle would focus still further off in proportion to the area of the circle. So from a uniformly luminous area there would result a focal line of constant brightness. The moon is, unfortunately, impotent to make an annular eclipse interesting.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
LODGE, O. Gravitation and Light. Nature 104, 354 (1919). https://doi.org/10.1038/104354a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/104354a0
This article is cited by
-
The gravitational bending of light by stars: a continuing story of curiosity, scepticism, surprise, and fascination
General Relativity and Gravitation (2011)
-
Nova Geminorum 1912 and the origin of the idea of gravitational lensing
Archive for History of Exact Sciences (2008)
-
Quasars behind Clusters of Galaxies
Nature (1970)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.