Abstract
We evaluated the relationship between renal resistive index (RRI) of the intrarenal vasculature and cardiovascular (CV) organ damage such as left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), diastolic dysfunction and carotid atherosclerosis in a large sample of hypertensive patients. 566 hypertensive patients underwent echocardiography with conventional Doppler and Doppler tissue imaging (DTI), carotid and renal ultrasonography. In addition, lipids profile, creatinine in serum, and urinary albumin concentrations were determined. The patients were divided according to their RRI values in 2 groups: <70 and ⩾70. Subjects with high RRI were older, had higher systolic and pulse pressure (PP) and more years of hypertension, compared to those with low RRI (P<0.0001). Patients with the higher RRI showed an increased left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and carotid intima–media thickness (IMT) with a higher prevalence of LVH, carotid plaques and microalbuminuria (P<0.001). There were differences in overall diastolic parameters, in particular when evaluated by DTI (P<0.001). A positive correlation was found between RRI and age, PP, carotid IMT, LVMI, SBP and a negative correlation was found with DTI diastolic parameters (P<0.001). Age, PP, carotid IMT and LVMI were independently related to RRI. While, RRI was independently related to IMT and IVRT. RRI, especially the higher values, are positively correlated with target organ damage in hypertensive patients, indicating that renal vascular resistance is related to morphologic and hemodynamic alteration of the CV system. The evaluation of RRI could predict the presence of early CV damage and provide an accurate estimate of overall risk.
Introduction
Epidemiologic and clinical studies have emphasized the close relationship between the rise of blood pressure (BP) and the incidence of cardiovascular (CV) disease.1, 2 It has been recognized that increased BP is a typical finding in patients with end-stage renal disease, and more recently increased pulse pressure and arterial stiffness have been linked to plasma creatinine and microalbuminuria in subjects with mild and moderate renal insufficiency.3, 4, 5 In addition, given the insidious nature of most CV risk factors and the atherosclerotic processes, early recognition of arterial functional and/or structural alterations may help us identify individuals with high risk of clinical complications.6, 7 Increased renal vascular resistance has recently been associated with the severity and duration of essential hypertension and with declining renal function in renal parenchymal disease.8 Previous studies have shown that the renal resistive index (RRI) is an indicator of renal vascular resistance in essential hypertension.9 Determining RRI is inexpensive (the same probe is used for the heart), fast (it takes a minute to perform) and requires little training (less than 1 month). In addition, RRI has been shown to be highly reproducible and independent of mean arterial BP.10, 11 Predicting future decline in renal function is important for subsequent therapeutic decision making.12 Here, we describe a study carried out to investigate which value of RRI, based on ultrasonic duplex scanning, is associated with the classic primary risk factors and the worst CV organ damage from hypertension. We studied the relationship between RRI of the intrarenal vasculature and CV organ damage such as left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), diastolic dysfunction and carotid atherosclerosis in a large sample of hypertensive patients. We also investigated whether hypertensives with high levels of RRI have an adverse metabolic risk profile.
Methods
Study population
We studied 566 consecutive patients (324 men, mean age 55±11 years, range 29–90) with stage I or II essential hypertension who were referred to our outpatient clinic. All subjects received a full history and a complete physical examination. The diagnosis of hypertension was considered when SBP was ⩾140 mm Hg and/or DBP ⩾90 mm Hg on at least three visits and when antihypertensive therapy was present. BP was measured by mercury sphygmomanometer with an appropriate size rubber cuff applied around the nondominant arm. Readings were based on Korotkoff first and fifth phase sounds. During each visit, three consecutive BP readings were obtained with the subject in the sitting position after a rest of at least 10 min. The average of the three readings was used for the analyses, recorded to the nearest 2 mm on the scale. Measurements were performed early in the morning and carried out by a trained investigator. We also determined lipid profile and creatinine in serum by standard laboratory methods. Moreover, a spot urine sample was investigated by measuring urinary albumin concentrations using albumin-specific dipstick test. Patients with renal failure (creatinine ⩾1.5 mg/dl in men and ⩾1.4 mg/dl in women), diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation and severe valvular heart disease were excluded from the study. Additional exclusions were severe obesity, defined as a body mass index (BMI) ⩾40 kg/m2, and peripheral vascular disease. None had any evidence or history of myocardial infarction or stroke. Each patient provided informed consent for the study and the Institutional Review Board at the participating clinical site approved the study. Of the 566 patients, 38% were previously treated for hypertension. The most frequent classes of antihypertensive drugs used were ACE inhibitors, calcium antagonists and diuretics. None received concomitant medications such as statins and antiplatelet drugs. Before the investigation, all drugs were discontinued, under medical supervision, for at least 1 week. All patients underwent the following instrumental procedures.
Renal colour-Doppler ultrasonography
Based on the mean and distribution of RRI in 40 normal volunteers (mean value 62±03, mean age 54±10 years), the normal upper limit was found to be 70. Thus, the patients were divided according to their arcuate artery resistance index values in two groups: <70 and ⩾70. RRI examinations were performed with 3.5 MHz transducer while the subject was in the supine position. The transducer was placed on the lumbar region, and the kidney was displayed by tomographic echography. Blood flow was visualized with colour-Doppler sonography superimposed on tomographic image. Thereafter, the Doppler signal was obtained from the arcuate arteries at the corticomedullary junction. RRI was calculated by the following equation: peak systolic velocity−peak end diastolic velocity/peak systolic velocity. RRI was determined at least three times for one kidney and then averaged. The mean RRI of the right and left kidneys was used for the subsequent analyses.
Carotid ultrasonography
Ultrasound examination of the carotid was performed with a 7.5-MHz linear-array transducer. Measurements involved a primary transverse and longitudinal scanning of common carotid artery, bifurcation and internal carotid. The end-diastolic intima-media thickness (IMT) of the far wall of the middle segment of both common carotid arteries, defined by a simultaneous electrocardiographic recording, was measured 1 cm caudal to the bulb, as the distance between the lumen–intima interface and the media–adventitia interface.13, 14 Each measurement was calculated by taking the average of three readings. Intima-media thickening of the common carotid arteries was defined as an average IMT ⩾0.9 mm. All measurements were made at a site without plaque. The near and far walls of the carotid were scanned longitudinally and transversally to assess the presence of plaques. The presence of plaques was defined as localized echo structures encroaching into the vessel lumen for which the distance between the media adventitia interface and internal side of the lesion was ⩾1.3 mm, or as the presence of calcification.
Echocardiography
The M-mode echocardiogram was performed with 3.5 MHz phased array placed on the III–IV left intercostal space along the parasternal line, with patients supine, in left lateral decubitus and the head of the bed kept at 30°. The end-diastolic measurements of left ventricular internal dimension, left interventricular septum and posterior wall thickness at the QRS peak using the Penn convention were measured. The left ventricular mass was calculated according to the Devereux formula. Patients with a left ventricular mass index (LVMI) >125 g/m2 in men and >110 g/m2 in women were classified as having LVH.15 Complete two-dimensional echocardiograms were obtained during normal respiration.
Diastolic function assessment
The pulsed Doppler sample volume was placed at the mitral valve tips and 5–10 cardiac cycles were recorded from the apical window on super-VHS videotape at a velocity of 100 mm/s. The following measurements of left ventricular diastolic function were determined: E and A peak velocities (m/s) and their ratio and E-wave deceleration time (ms) by placing a continuous-wave Doppler sample volume between left ventricular outflow tract and the mitral valve. Pulsed Doppler recordings from left ventricular outflow tract were used to measure isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) from the closure spike of the aortic valve to onset of mitral flow.
Moreover, the Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) program was set to the pulsed-wave Doppler mode. Filters were set to exclude high-frequency signals, and the Nyquist limit was adjusted to a velocity range of 15–20 cm/s, gains were minimized to allow for a clear tissue signal with minimal background noise. All DTI recordings were obtained during normal respiration. A 5-mm sample volume was placed at the apical four-chamber view on the lateral corner of the mitral annulus. The resulting velocities were recorded for 5–10 cardiac cycles at a sweep speed of 100 mm/s and stored on a 1/2-inch VHS videotape for later playback and analysis. The following measurements were determined as diastolic indexes: myocardial early (Em) and atrial (Am) peak velocities (m/s) and their ratios. We used DTI because the technique is better than conventional Doppler at detecting hypertension-associated dysfunction, in particular when LVH is present.16
All echocardiographic and ultrasonographic examinations, were recorded on videotape and performed by the same experienced physician. For all ultrasonographic examinations, we used the Aloka ProSound 5500 (Aloka CO, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a variable-frequency phased-array transducer and DTI capabilities.
Analysis of urine
Urinary albumin concentration was performed using Micral test strips (Roche Diagnostics GmBH, Mannheim, Germany) by an experienced physician. Micral test is an immunoassay test. After immersing the strip in the urine sample for 5 s, a colour reaction takes place and the colour is proportional to the albumin concentration in the urine. The Micral test yields a range of semiquantitative results, which are determined by comparing the strip colour with four colour blocks on the vial label corresponding to concentrations approximating 0, 20, 50, 100 mg of albumin/l.17, 18 Following the manufacturer's instructions, albumin concentration readings ⩾20 mg/l were classified as positive for microalbuminuria. All patients positive at the first test underwent a second test to confirm the previous value. Patients had confirmed microalbuminuria when both tests were positive.
Data analysis
Statistical analysis was carried out by GB-STAT version 6.50 (Dynamic Microsystems, Inc., Silver Spring, MD, USA). Comparison between groups was performed using the Student's t-test for unpaired data. Comparisons of categorical data were made using Fisher's exact test. Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to investigate the linear relationship between RRI and other variables. Stepwise forward regression analysis was performed to assess which factors independently influence RRI and whether RRI is an independent predictor of CV damage. Variables selected for inclusion in the models were those significant at univariate analysis. Significance was defined as P<0.05. The results are expressed as means±s.d. Kappa statistic was used to assess inter and intrareader variability for echocardiographic and ultrasonographic parameters.
Results
Table 1 shows the demographic and clinical characteristics distinguishing the 338 patients with RRI <70 from the 228 patients with an index ⩾70. Subjects with high RRI were older, had higher systolic and pulse pressure and more years of hypertension, compared to those with low resistance index (P<0.0001). There were no significant differences in total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides and serum creatinine. BMI and smoking habit did not differ significantly between groups. Patients with the higher RRI showed a significantly increased LVMI and carotid IMT (P<0.001). Moreover, there were significant differences in overall diastolic parameters, in particular when evaluated by DTI (P<0.001). These showed a left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with high RRI. Furthermore, patients with the higher value of RRI also showed a significant higher prevalence of LVH, carotid plaques and microalbuminuria (P<0.001) (Figure 1). A high positive correlation was found between RRI and age (r=0.59, P<0.001), pulse pressure (r=0.47, P<0.001), carotid IMT (r=0.44, P<0.001), LVMI (r=0.37, P<0.001), SBP (r=0.35, P<0.001), duration of hypertension (r=0.31, P<0.001). Furthermore, RRI was negatively correlated with DTI diastolic parameters (r=−0.34, P<0.001). A low positive correlation was found between RRI and E/A (r=−0.24, P<0.001), E-wave deceleration time (r=0.23, P<0.001), BMI (r=0.16, P<0.01), total cholesterol (r=0.14, P<0.01) and HDL cholesterol (r=0.11, P<0.05). There was no correlation between RRI and DBP (r=0.08, P=0.079), triglycerides (r=0.009, P=0.82) and serum creatinine (r=−0.02, P=0.60). Stepwise forward regression analysis was performed with RRI as a dependant variable and with age, SBP, DBP, PP, carotid IMT, LVMI, E-wave deceleration time, E/A and Em/Am ratios and IVRT as independent variables. As shown in Table 2, age, PP, carotid IMT and LVMI were independently related to RRI, while RRI was independently related only to IMT (β-coefficient: 0.571; Standard error (β): 0.147; t-value: 3.873; P=0.0001) and IVRT (β-coefficient: 134.917; Standard error (β): 7.999; t value: 16.868; P=0.0001). The inter and intrareader variability was good (K>0.75).
Discussion
This is the largest study, using all non-invasive CV procedures, confirming that high RRI is a strong, independent predictor of CV target organ damage and renal dysfunction. Hypertensive patients with RRI ⩾70 had increased carotid IMT and LVMI with preclinical impairment of left ventricular diastolic function and exhibited a higher percentage of LVH, plaques and microalbuminuria compared with low RRI. A high resistive index is associated with a great difference in velocity between the systolic and the diastolic phase that, in part, depends on the degree of peripheral arterial stiffness.19 Hypertension may cause nephrosclerosis or glomerulosclerosis, reducing the intrarenal vascular surface area and increasing vascular resistance even in the unaffected kidney.20 The evaluation of RRI in hypertensive patients reveals significantly higher values than normotensive subjects, even without overt nephropathy.21 Nevertheless, lower RRI values were associated with low renal and CV target organ damage.22 This finding is not surprising because patients with hypertension in an early phase maintain stable function even over long periods. This is especially true when a good control of BP is achieved using antihypertensive agents that might convey additional specific CV protection beyond BP control.23 In this condition, the alteration in renal vascular resistance is probably functional and reversible, partly caused by vascular changes such as vasoconstriction mediated by circulating angiotensin II or other neuroendocrine agents. While in an advanced phase, the alteration is structural and irreversible. Although RRI may not be useful in the differential diagnosis of intrinsic renal disease because it does not differ in the various types of renal parenchymal diseases.24 It is also well known that high RRI values are associated with poor renal prognosis; recently, Radermacher et al.,8 showed that a very high RRI of at least 80 or higher reliably identifies hypertensive patients, without renal artery stenosis, at risk for progressive renal disease.8 It is unclear whether this indicates irreversible renal scarring or whether a therapeutic strategy could favourably influence the prognosis.8 Other studies reported that RRI was positively correlated with IMT, albumin-to-creatinine ratio, macroangiopathy and carotid arteriosclerosis.22, 25 Furthermore, when the resistive index is measured in the internal carotid artery, it shows a high correlation with increased IMT and with the severity of atherosclerosis as well as the ability to distinguish between low- and high-risk patients.26 A direct correlation between IMT, LVMI and the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke in a population of patients without a prior history of CV disease has been shown.27, 28 We report that the highest RRI levels are associated with other forms of CV organ damage. Our results suggest that the RI of intrarenal arteries could be a useful marker for early organ damage and might be a predictor of future CV complications in hypertensive patients. Furthermore, the present findings show that there is a significant relation between left ventricular diastolic function, renal Doppler parameters and microalbuminuria in hypertensive patients, suggesting that cardiac damage progresses in parallel with renal involvement from the early stage. Microalbuminuria is an early sign of nephropathy, but is also an established marker of increased risk for end-stage renal disease, atherosclerotic risk, CV morbidity and mortality, and is a marker of generalized vascular dysfunction in hypertensive patients.6, 29 Our findings pointed out that RRI could be a good indicator of renal function and early intravascular and cardiac dysfunction such as microalbuminuria. To measure microalbuminuria, we used the semiquantitative Micral test for our large cohort. This is a simple and valuable method, with a negative predictive value of 92%, to identify hypertensive patients with microalbuminuria in a primary care setting and is a screening rather than a diagnostic test.17, 18
In conclusion, we have shown that RRI, especially the high values, are positively correlated with target organ damage in hypertensive patients, indicating that renal vascular resistance is related to morphologic and hemodynamic alteration of the CV system. The evaluation of RRI may predict early CV damage and provide an accurate estimate of overall risk. Assessment of global CV risk is one of the main elements of most current hypertension management guidelines. Changes in renal haemodynamics and cardiac geometry already occur in subjects with high-normal BP and CV events are consistently increased when compared to people with optimal BP.12, 30 The 2003 European guidelines for management of hypertension suggest that high normal BP includes values considered high in high-risk subjects for whom antihypertensive treatment is recommended.15 As an extensive diagnostic workup may be too expensive, the use of integrated, low-cost and easy-to-detect parameters may be helpful in clinical practise to discover high-risk subjects. The ability to stratify patients according to their CV risk is important for subsequent therapeutic decisions and could help to identify hypertensive patients for whom more aggressive, preventive therapy is advisable. Furthermore, longitudinal studies are needed to assess the predictive role of increased RRI in hypertensive patients and whether this could be prevented by optimal BP or by specific agents is still unclear. Evidence is emerging on the beneficial effect of blocking renin–angiotensin system activation that may reverse subclinical target organ damage and prevent CV events.23, 31, 32

References
Mancia G, Volpe R, Boros S, Ilardi M, Giannattasio C . Cardiovascular risk profile and blood pressure control in Italian hypertensive patients under specialist care. J Hypertens 2004; 22: 51–57.
Kannel WB . Cardioprotection and antihypertensive therapy: the key importance of addressing the associated coronary risk factors (the Framingham experience). Am J Cardiol 1996; 77: 6B–11B.
Alberti D, Locatelli F, Graziani G, Buccianti G, Redaelli B, Giangrande A et al. Hypertension and chronic renal insufficiency: the experience of the Northern Italian Cooperative Study Group. Am J Kidney Dis 1993; 21: 124–130.
Pedrinelli R, Dell'Olmo G, Penno G, Bandinelli S, Bertini A, Di Bello V et al. Microalbuminuria and pulse pressure in hypertensive and atherosclerotic men. Hypertension 2000; 35: 48–54.
Agewall S, Wikstrand J, Ljungman S, Fagerberg B . Usefulness of microalbuminuria in predicting cardiovascular mortality in treated hypertensive men with and without diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80: 164–169.
Glasser PG, Arnett DK, McVeigh GE, Finkelstein SM, Bank AJ, Morgan JM et al. Vascular compliance and cardiovascular disease. A risk factor or a marker? Am J Hypertens 1997; 10: 1175–1189.
Duprez DA, De Buyzere ML, De Backer TL, Van De Veire N, Clement DL, Cohn JN . Relationship between arterial elasticity indices and carotid artery intima-media thickness. Am J Hypertens 2000; 13: 1226–1232.
Radermacher J, Ellis S, Haller H . Renal resistance index and progression of renal disease. Hypertension 2002; 39, [part 2] 699–703.
Jensen G, Bardelli M, Volkmann R, Caidahl K, Rose G, Aurell M et al. Renovascular resistance in primary hypertension: experimental variations detected by means of Doppler ultrasound. J Hypertens 1994; 12: 959–964.
Boddi M, Sacchi S, Lammel RM, Mohseni R, Neri-Serneri GG . Age-related and vasomotor stimuli-induced changes in renal vascular resistance detected by Doppler ultrasound. Am J Hypertens 1996; 9: 10–14.
Rawashdeh YF, Mortensen J, Horlyck A, Olsen KO, Fisker RV, Schroll L et al. Resistive index: an experimental study of the normal range in the pig. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2000; 34: 10–14.
Fesler P, du Cailar G, Ribstein J, Mimran A . Heterogeneity of cardiorenal characteristics in normotensive subjects. Hypertension 2004; 43: 219–223.
Kanters SD, Elgersma OE, Banga JD, Van Leeuwen MS, Algra A . Reproducibility of measurements of intima-media thickness and distensibility in the common carotid artery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1998; 16: 28–35.
Bots ML, Evans GW, Riley WA, Grobbee DE . Carotid intima-media thickness measurements in intervention studies: design options, progression rates, and sample size considerations. A point of view. Stroke 2003; 34: 2985–2994.
Guidelines Committee. 2003 European Society of Hypertension–European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 1011–1053.
Wang M, Yip GWK, Wang AYM, Zhang Y, Ho PY, Tse MK et al. Tissue Doppler imaging provides incremental prognostic value in patients with systemic hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy. J Hypertens 2005; 23: 183–191.
Spooren PF, Lekkerkerker JF, Vermes I . Micral-test: a qualitative dipstick test for micro-albuminuria. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1992; 18: 83–87.
Zeller A, Haehner T, Battegay E, Martina B . Diagnostic significance of transferrinuria and albumin-specific dipstick testing in primary care patients with elevated office blood pressure. J Hum Hypertens 2005; 19: 205–209.
Norris CS, Barnes RW . Renal artery flow velocity analysis: a sensitive measure of experimental and clinical renovascular resistance. J Surg Res 1984; 36: 230–236.
Petersen LJ, Petersen JR, Ladefoged SD, Mehlsen J, Jjensen HA . The pulsatility index and the resistive index in renal arteries in patients with hypertension and chronic renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1995; 10: 2060–2064.
Galešić K, Brkljačić B, Sabljar-Matovinović M, Morović-Vergles J, Cvitković-Kuzmić A, Božikov V . Renal vascular resistance in essential hypertension: Duplex-Doppler ultrasonographic evaluation. Angiology 2000; 51: 667–675.
Pontremoli R, Viazzi F, Martinoli C, Ravera M, Nicolella C, Berruti V et al. Increased renal resistive index in patients with essential hypertension: a marker of target organ damage. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999; 14: 360–365.
Leoncini G, Martinoli C, Viazzi F, Ravera M, Parodi D, Ratto E et al. Changes in renal resistive index and urinary albumin excretion in hypertensive patients under long-term treatment with lisinopril or nifedipine GITS. Nephron 2002; 90: 169–173.
Tublin ME, Bude RO, Platt JF . The resistive index in renal Doppler sonography. AJR 2003; 180: 885–892.
Okura T, Watanabe S, Miyoshi K, Fukuoka T, Higaki J . Intrarenal and carotid hemodynamics in patients with essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2004; 17: 240–244.
Frauchiger B, Schimd HP, Roedel C, Moosmann P, Staub D . Comparison of carotid arterial resistive indices with intima-media thickness as sonographic markers of atherosclerosis. Stroke 2001; 32: 836–841.
O'Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, Manolio TA, Burke GL, Wolfson SK . Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 14–22.
Gosse P . Left ventricular hypertrophy as a predictor of cardiovascular risk. J Hypertens 2005; 23 (Suppl 1): S27–S33.
Tsioufis C, Dimitriadis K, Antoniadis D, Stefanadis C, Kallikazaros I . Inter-relationships of microalbuminuria with the other surrogates of the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in hypertensive subjects. Am J Hypertens 2004; 17: 470–476.
Vasan RS, Larson MG, Leip EP, Evans JC, O'Donnel CJ, Kannel WB et al. Impact of high-normal blood pressure on the risk of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1291–1297.
Natale F, Tedesco MA, Di Nardo G, Tassinario G, Ambrosio S, Mocerino R et al. Renal resistive index evaluation in hypertensive patients before and after therapy with losartan. (abstract) Ital Heart J 2004; 5 (suppl 9): 269S.
Volpe M, Ruilope LM, McInnes GT, Waeber B, Weber MA . Angiotensin-II receptor blockers: benefits beyond blood pressure? J Hum Hypertens 2005; 19: 331–339.
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tedesco, M., Natale, F., Mocerino, R. et al. Renal resistive index and cardiovascular organ damage in a large population of hypertensive patients. J Hum Hypertens 21, 291–296 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1002145
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1002145
Keywords
- renal resistive index
- left ventricular mass
- carotid wall thickness
- diastolic function
- microalbuminuria
Further reading
-
Early changes in renal resistive index and mortality in diabetic and nondiabetic kidney transplant recipients: a cohort study
BMC Nephrology (2021)
-
Renal resistive index as a predictor of postoperative complications in liver resection surgery. Observational study
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing (2021)
-
Hypertension is Common in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acromegaly and is Independently Associated with Renal Resistive Index
High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention (2019)
-
Diurnal variation of renal resistive index over 24-hour period in hypertensive patients and healthy controls
Abdominal Radiology (2019)
-
Renal systolic time intervals derived from intra-renal artery Doppler as a novel predictor of adverse cardiac outcomes
Scientific Reports (2017)
