Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Cost of poor blood pressure control in the UK: 62 000 unnecessary deaths per year

Abstract

High blood pressure is the most important risk factor for cardiovascular disease. With the information on systolic blood pressure from the recently published meta-analysis of prospective studies, we calculated the reductions in stroke and ischaemic heart disease with control of all hypertensives to a systolic blood pressure of 140 mmHg. For adults there would be a reduction of 28–44% in stroke and 20–35% in ischaemic heart disease depending on age. In the UK, this would prevent approximately 21 400 stroke deaths and 41 400 ischaemic heart disease deaths each year. Around half of those who suffer a stroke or ischaemic heart disease survive, there would be a proportionate decrease in these people as well. These amount to approximately 42 800 strokes and 82 800 ischaemic heart diseases saved, making a total of 125 600 events saved a year in the UK. This would result in a reduction in disability and major cost savings both to individuals, their families and the Health Service. The blood pressure levels and control of blood pressure in many countries are similar to those in the UK, so the reductions in stroke and ischaemic heart disease worldwide, if the same control of high blood pressure could be obtained, would be immense.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Ezzati M et al; the Comparative Risk Assessment Collaborating Group. Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease. Lancet 2002; 360: 1347–1360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Murray CJL et al. Effectiveness and costs of interventions to lower systolic blood pressure and cholesterol: a global and regional analysis on reduction of cardiovascular-disease risk. Lancet 2003; 361: 717–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Prospective studies collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002; 360: 1903–1913.

  4. Primatesta P, Brookes M, Poulter NR . Improved hypertension management and control: results from the Health Survey for England 1998. Hypertension 2001; 38: 827–832.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Coronary heart disease statistics. British Heart Foundation Statistics Database 2002. http://www.dphpc.ox.ac.uk/bhfhprg/stats/2000/index.html.

  6. MacMahon S et al. Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease, Part 1, Prolonged differences in BP: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias. Lancet 1990; 335: 765–774.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. SHEP Cooperative Research Group. Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. Final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). JAMA 1991; 265: 3255–3264.

  8. Staessen JA et al. Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. The Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial Investigators. Lancet 1997; 350: 757–764.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. The Anti-hypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 2002; 288: 2981–2997.

  10. Hansson L et al. Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. HOT Study Group. Lancet 1998; 351: 1755–1762.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown MJ et al. Better blood pressure control: how to combine drugs. J Hum Hypertens 2003; 17: 81–86.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Paola Primatesta for providing us with the average blood pressure of hypertensives in the Health Survey for England 1998.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G A MacGregor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

He, F., MacGregor, G. Cost of poor blood pressure control in the UK: 62 000 unnecessary deaths per year. J Hum Hypertens 17, 455–457 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001581

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001581

Keywords

  • blood pressure control
  • stroke
  • ischaemic heart disease

Further reading

Search

Quick links