Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Compliance to hypertension guidelines in clinical practice: a multicentre pilot study in Italy

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic approach to recently diagnosed hypertensive patients by primary care physicians in Italy and to find out whether general practitioners manage these patients according to 1999 WHO/ISH guideline recommendations. In total, 228 consecutive patients (117 men and 111 women, mean age 51±12 years) with recently diagnosed hypertension (<2 years) referred for the first time to six outpatient hypertension centres throughout Italy were included in the study. The primary care physicians' approach was evaluated during the specialist visit by a specific questionnaire containing detailed questions about diagnostic work-up and treatment made at the time of the first diagnosis of hypertension. At the study visit, 71% of the patients were on treatment with antihypertensive drugs and 18.7% of them had blood pressure (BP) values lower than 140/90 mmHg. A complete clinical and laboratory evaluation according to the minimum work-up suggested by the guidelines had been carried out in only 10% of the patients. A full physical examination had been performed in 60% of the patients, electrocardiogram in 54%, serum total cholesterol in 53%, glucose in 49%, creatinine in 49%, urine analysis in 46%, potassium in 42%, and fundus oculi in 19%. Additional investigations such as ambulatory BP monitoring, echocardiogram, carotid ultrasonogram, and microalbuminuria had been carried out in a minority of patients (21, 18, 9, and 3%, respectively). The impact on hypertension guidelines on patients' management in everyday primary care practice appears marginal. Thus, our findings indicate that the majority of general practitioners manage hypertensive patients according to a simple BP-based approach rather than a more integrated approach based on global risk stratification.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MacMahon S et al. Blood pressure, stroke and coronary heart disease, part 1: prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias Lancet 1990 335: 765–774

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kannel WB, Belanger AJ . Epidemiology of heart failure Am Heart J 1991 121: 951–957

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. He J, Whelton PK . Elevated systolic blood pressure and risk of cardiovascular and renal disease: an overview of evidence from observational epidemiologic studies and randomized controlled trials Am Heart J 1999 138: S211–S219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Collins R et al. Blood pressure, stroke and coronary heart disease, part 2: short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomized drug trials in their epidemiological context Lancet 1990 325: 827–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hebert PR et al. Recent evidence on drug therapy of mild to moderate hypertension and decreased risk of coronary heart disease Arch Intern Med 1993 153: 578–581

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Moser M, Hebert PR . Prevention of disease progression, left ventricular hypertrophy and congestive heart failure in hypertension treatment trials J Am Coll Cardiol 1996 27: 1214–1218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hansson L et al. for the HOT Study Group. Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial Lancet 1996 351: 1755–1762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. Arterial hypertension In Technical Report Series 628 Geneva: World Health Organisation 1978

  9. Guidelines Subcommittee. 1989. Guidelines for the management of mild hypertension: memorandum from a WHO/ISH meeting Clin Exp Hyper—Theory Prac 1989 A11: 1203–1216

  10. Zanchetti A, Mancia G . Editor's corner: debating the value of absolute versus relative risk J Hypertens 1996 14: 681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 1999 World Health Organization—International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension. Guidelines Subcommittee. J Hypertens 1999 17: 151–183

  12. Waeber B . Treatment strategy to control blood pressure optimally in hypertensive patients Blood Pressure 2001 10: 62–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamilton-Craig CR, Tonkin AL, Jobling RG . How accurate are hypertension treatment decisions? Blood Pressure 2000 9: 323–327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure Arch Intern Med 1997 157: 2413–2446

  15. Fahey TP, Peters TJ . What constitutes controlled hypertension? Patient-based comparison of hypertension guidelines BMJ 1996 313: 93–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dickerson JE, Garrat CJ, Brown MJ . Management of hypertension in general practice: agreements with and variations from the British Hypertension Society guidelines J Hum Hypertens 1995 9: 835–839

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ogden LG, He J, Lydick E, Whelton PK . Long-term absolute benefit of lowering blood pressure in hypertensive patients according to JNC VI risk stratification Hypertension 2000 35: 539–543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hyman DJ, Pavlik VA . Self-reported hypertension treatment practices among primary care physicians Arch Intern Med 2000 160: 2281–2286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hagemeister J et al. Hypertension guidelines and their limitations. The impact of physicians' compliance as evaluated by guidelines awareness J Hypertens 2001 19: 2079–2086

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cuspidi C et al. Awareness of hypertension guidelines in general practice: a pilot study in Lombardy Ital Heart J 2002 3: 60–63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C Cuspidi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cuspidi, C., Michev, I., Lonati, L. et al. Compliance to hypertension guidelines in clinical practice: a multicentre pilot study in Italy. J Hum Hypertens 16, 699–703 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001468

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001468

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links