Abstract
WHEN we wrote recently (NATURE, October 28, 1909) about a supposed new mineral from Co. Antrim, we were led to believe that the specimen we had received was from the basalt—our information, in fact, was that “a very big pocket of it” had been found in that rock, but the exact locality could not be ascertained at that time, the finder having left home.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MOSS, R., SEYMOUR, H. A Supposed New Mineral. Nature 82, 280 (1910). https://doi.org/10.1038/082280c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/082280c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.