Letter | Published:

The Commutative Law of Addition, and Infinity

Nature volume 81, page 69 (15 July 1909) | Download Citation



REFERRING to the review of Hilbert's “Grundlagen der Geometric,” on p. 394 of No. 2066 of NATURE (June 3), may I point out that the commutative law of addition can be proved without the help of any axioms at all, other than those of general logic? The method, indeed, used by Peano in 1889 (“Arithmetices Principia …,” Turin, 1889, p. 4), which is only based on axioms of a general nature (such as the principle of mathematical induction), and not on such special laws as the distributive ones, appears in so far superior to Hilbert's; and, since all Peano's axioms were proved in Mr. Russell's “Principles of Mathematics” of 1903, Hilbert's proof seems quite superseded. Further, the difficulties arising out of Dedekind's proof of the existence of infinite systems can be avoided without the introduction of “metaphysical” arguments about time and Consciousness (see Russell, Hibbert Journal, July, 1904, pp. 809–12), as, indeed, your reviewer seems to think possible. But the connection of the fact that the existence of an infinity of thoughts (which must be in time) with Hamilton's idea that algebra was interpretable especially in the time-manifold, just as geometry is in the spacemanifold, is not obvious.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Author information


  1. The Manor House, Broadwindsor, Beaminster, Dorset, July 2.



  1. Search for PHILIP E. B. JOURDAIN in:

About this article

Publication history





By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.