Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Weight status and perception barriers to healthy physical activity and diet behavior

International Journal of Obesity volume 32, pages 343–352 (2008)Cite this article

Abstract

Background:

Physical inactivity and insufficient fruit and vegetable consumption are key risk factors for obesity and noncommunicable diseases. Weight perceptions may affect physical activity and diet behaviors. We report current prevalence estimates of Australian adults meeting recommended levels of leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) (⩾150 min/week or more of at least moderate-intensity physical activity (including walking) on ⩾5 days/week) and fruit (⩾2 servings/day) and vegetable (⩾5 servings/day) consumption for health benefits, by weight status and perceptions.

Methods:

We conducted a cross-sectional survey analysis of data for 16 314 adults from the Australian National Health Survey 2004–2005. All variables were collected by self-report. Weighted estimates were age- and gender-specific, and data were analyzed using logistic regression with acceptable weight referent categories, adjusting for covariates.

Results:

Among acceptable, overweight and obese adults, the prevalence of LTPA was 26.8, 26.1 and 19.3% for men, and 27.7, 23.7 and 19.7% for women, respectively. Approximately 55 and 15% of adults consumed sufficient fruit servings/day and vegetable servings/day, respectively, and less than 5% of adults met combined LTPA and diet guidelines. Overweight decreased the odds ratio for LTPA among women but not men, and obesity decreased the odds ratio for LTPA among both men and women. Overweight perception conferred odds ratios of 0.83 (95% CI 0.70–0.97, P=0.021) for overweight men, and of 0.74 (95% CI 0.62–0.88, P=0.001) and 0.69 (95% CI 0.59–0.80, P<0.001) for obese men and women, respectively; for LTPA, whereas no significant associations were found for acceptable weight perception. No consistent associations between weight status or perceptions and diet behaviors were found.

Conclusions:

Overweight perception may be another barrier to physical activity participation among men and women with excess body weight. Public health strategies might need to focus on overcoming weight perception as well as weight status barriers to adopting healthy physical activity behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Johnson CL . Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2000. JAMA 2002; 288: 1723–1727.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Silventoinen K, Sans S, Tolonen H, Monterde D, Kuulasmaa K, Kesteloot H et al. Trends in obesity and energy supply in the WHO MONICA Project. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004; 28: 710–718.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. AusDiab Steering C. Diabesity & Associated Disorders in Australia—2000. International Diabetes Institute: Melbourne, 2001.

  4. Turley M, Tobias M, Paul S . Non-fatal disease burden associated with excess body mass index and waist circumference in New Zealand adults. Aust NZ J Public Health 2006; 30: 231–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gu D, He J, Duan X, Reynolds K, Wu X, Chen J et al. Body weight and mortality among men and women in China. JAMA 2006; 295: 776–783.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Onat A, Sari I, Hergenc G, Yazici M, Uyarel H, Can G et al. Predictors of abdominal obesity and high susceptibility of cardiometabolic risk to its increments among Turkish women: a prospective population-based study. Metabolism 2007; 56: 348–356.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Onat A, Uyarel H, Hergenc G, Karabulut A, Albayrak S, Can G . Determinants and definition of abdominal obesity as related to risk of diabetes, metabolic syndrome and coronary disease in Turkish men: a prospective cohort study. Atherosclerosis 2007; 191: 182–190.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Katzmarzyk PT, Ardern CI . Overweight and obesity mortality trends in Canada, 1985–2000. Can J Public Health 2004; 95: 16–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Must A, Spadano J, Coakley EH, Field AE, Colditz G, Dietz WH . The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. JAMA 1999; 282: 1523–1529.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Flegal KM, Graubard BI, Williamson DF, Gail MH . Excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity. [see comment]. JAMA 2005; 293: 1861–1867.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Simon GE, Von Korff M, Saunders K, Miglioretti DL, Crane PK, van Belle G et al. Association between obesity and psychiatric disorders in the US adult population. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006; 63: 824–830.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumanyika S, Jeffery RW, Morabia A, Ritenbaugh C, Antipatis VJ, Public Health Approaches to the Prevention of Obesity Working Group of the International Obesity Task F. Obesity prevention: the case for action. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002; 26: 425–436.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. WHO. Preventing Chronic Diseases—A Vital Investment. Part Two—The Urgent Need for Action (Retrieved July 10, from: http://www.who.int/chp/chronic_disease_report/en/): World Health Organization; 2005.

  14. Sundquist K, Qvist J, Johansson S-E, Sundquist J . The long-term effect of physical activity on incidence of coronary heart disease: a 12-year follow-up study. Prev Med 2005; 41: 219–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dunstan DW, Salmon J, Owen N, Armstrong T, Zimmet PZ, Welborn TA, et al., on behalf of the AusDiab Steering C. Associations of TV viewing and physical activity with the metabolic syndrome in Australian adults. Diabetologia 2005; 48: 2254–2261.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gregg EW, Gerzoff RB, Caspersen CJ, Williamson DF, Narayan KM . Relationship of walking to mortality among US adults with diabetes. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 1440–1447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bazzano LA, He J, Ogden LG, Loria CM, Vupputuri S, Myers L et al. Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of cardiovascular disease in US adults: the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2002; 76: 93–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chang VW, Christakis NA . Self-perception of weight appropriateness in the United States. Am J Prev Med 2003; 24: 332–339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Blokstra A, Burns CM, Seidell JC . Perception of weight status and dieting behaviour in Dutch men and women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999; 23: 7–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Donath SM . Who's overweight? Comparison of the medical definition and community views. Med J Aust 2000; 172: 375–377.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Timperio A, Cameron-Smith D, Burns C, Crawford D . The public's response to the obesity epidemic in Australia: weight concerns and weight control practices of men and women. Public Health Nutr 2000; 3: 417–424.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bennett EM . Weight-loss practices of overweight adults. Am J Clin Nutr 1991; 53 (Suppl 6): 1519S–1521S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bandura A . Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  24. AAPOR. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Cases Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys 4th edn. American Association for Public Opinion Research: Lenexa, Kansas, 2006.

  25. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 1381–1395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Department of Health and Ageing. National Physical Activity Guidelines for Australians, Canberra. (Retrieved September 25 from: http://www.ausport.gov.au/fulltext/1999/feddep/physguide.pdf#search=%22physical%20activity%20recommendations%22):Australian Government. Department of Health and Ageing.1999.

  27. CDC. Physical Activity for Everyone: Recommendations, (Retrieved September 25 from: http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/physical/recommendations/index.htm): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2006.

  28. WHO. Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. (Retrieved September 25 from: http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/publications/facts/pa/en/index.html): World Health Organization; 2006.

  29. Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, Haskell WL, Macera CA, Bouchard C et al. Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA 1995; 273: 402–407.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Merom D, Phongsavan P, Chey T, Bauman A, Australian Bureau of S. Long-term changes in leisure time walking, moderate and vigorous exercise: were they influenced by the National Physical Activity Guidelines? J Sci Med Sport 2006; 9: 199–208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bauman A, Ford I, Armstrong T . Trends in Population Levels of Reported Physical Activity in Australia, 1997, 1999 and 2000. Australian Sports Commission: Canberra, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  32. ABS. National Nutrition Survey User's Guide 1995, Catalogue No. 4801.1. Australian Bureau of Statistics: Canberra, 1998.

  33. Rutishauser IHE, Webb K, Abraham B, Allsopp R . Evaluation of Short Dietary Questions from the 1995 National Nutrition Survey, Canberra (Retrieved April 11, 2007 from: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/wcms/publishing.nsf/Content/B1EB027FB11FEFD0CA256F190004C81F/$File/evaluation.pdf) Australian Government—Department of Health and Ageing; 2001.

  34. Department of Health and Ageing. Dietary Guidelines for Australians: A Guide to Healthy Eating (Retrieved November 8, 2006 from: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/_files/n31.pdf): Australian Government. Food for Health and Synopsis; 2003.

  35. USDA. Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans: PART A: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: 2005 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee Report (Retrieved November 14, 2006 from: http://www.health.gov/dietaryguidelines/dga2005/report/HTML/A_ExecSummary.htm); 2005.

  36. WHO. The WHO Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health: Information sheet: fruit, vegetables and NCD disease prevention. World Health Organization: Geneva (Retrieved November 14, 2006 from: http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/media/en/gsfs_fv.pdf); 2003.

  37. Macera CA, Ham SA, Yore MM, Jones DA, Ainsworth BE, Kimsey CD et al. Prevalence of physical activity in the United States: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2001. Prev Chronic Dis 2005; 2: A17.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen Y, Mao Y . Obesity and leisure time physical activity among Canadians. Prev Med 2006; 42: 261–265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ball K, Mishra GD, Thane CW, Hodge A . How well do Australian women comply with dietary guidelines? Public Health Nutr 2004; 7: 443–452.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ôunpuu S, Dans T, Avezum A, Lanas F et al. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case–control study. The Lancet 2004; 364: 937–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mathers CD, Vos ET, Stevenson CE, Begg SJ . The burden of disease and injury in Australia. Bull World Health Organ 2001; 79: 1076–1084.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Pomerleau J, Lock K, Knai C, McKee M . Interventions designed to increase adult fruit and vegetable intake can be effective: a systematic review of the literature. J Nutr 2005; 135: 2486–2495.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. CDC. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Prevalence of fruit and vegetable consumption and physical activity by race/ethnicity—United States, 2005. MMWR—Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2007; 56: 301–304.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Carlsson S, Andersson T, Lichtenstein P, Michaelsson K, Ahlbom A . Genetic effects on physical activity: results from the Swedish Twin Registry. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006; 38: 1396–1401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ball K, Crawford D, Owen N . Too fat to exercise? Obesity as a barrier to physical activity. Aust N Z J Public Health 2000; 24: 331–333.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ekkekakis P, Lind E . Exercise does not feel the same when you are overweight: the impact of self-selected and imposed intensity on affect and exertion. Int J Obes 2006; 30: 652–660.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Raper N, Perloff B, Ingwersen L, Steinfeldt L, Anand J . An overview of USDA's Dietary Intake Data System. J Food Comp Anal 2004; 17: 545–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wardle J, Haase AM, Steptoe A . Body image and weight control in young adults: international comparisons in university students from 22 countries. Int J Obes 2006; 30: 644–651.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Wardle J, Johnson F . Weight and dieting: examining levels of weight concern in British adults. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002; 26: 1144–1149.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Kylie Ball is supported by a NHMRC/NHFA Career Development Award.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Exercise, Health and Performance Faculty Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

    E Atlantis

  2. National Health and Medical Research Council, Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

    E H Barnes

  3. Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition (C-PAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia

    K Ball

Authors
  1. E Atlantis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E H Barnes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K Ball
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E Atlantis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Atlantis, E., Barnes, E. & Ball, K. Weight status and perception barriers to healthy physical activity and diet behavior. Int J Obes 32, 343–352 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803707

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803707

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links