Review Article | Published:

Part II: The Endocannabinoids and Regulation of Energy Balance; The Endocannabinoid System: a Target for Anti-Obesity Drugs

The role of the endocannabinoid system in the control of energy homeostasis

International Journal of Obesityvolume 30pagesS33S38 (2006) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

The endocannabinoid system has recently emerged as an important regulator of energy homeostasis, involved in the control of both appetite and peripheral fat metabolism. We briefly review current understanding of the possible sites of action and cellular mechanisms involved in the central appetitive and peripheral metabolic effects of endocannabinoids. Studies in our laboratory, using leptin-deficient obese rodents and CB1 cannabinoid receptor (CB1)-deficient mice, have indicated that endocannabinoids acting via CB1 are involved in the hunger-induced increase in food intake and are negatively regulated by leptin in brain areas involved in appetite control, including the hypothalamus, limbic forebrain and amygdala. CB1−/− mice are lean and are resistant to diet-induced obesity (DIO) despite similar energy intake to wild-type mice with DIO, suggesting that CB1 regulation of body weight involves additional peripheral targets. Such targets appear to include both adipose tissue and the liver. CB1 expressed in adipocytes has been implicated in the control of adiponectin secretion and lipoprotein lipase activity. Recent findings indicate that both endocannabinoids and CB1 are present in the liver and are upregulated in DIO. CB1 stimulation increases de novo hepatic lipogenesis through activation of the fatty acid biosynthetic pathway. Components of this pathway are also expressed in the hypothalamus where they have been implicated in the regulation of appetite. The fatty acid biosynthetic pathway may thus represent a common molecular target for the central appetitive and peripheral metabolic effects of endocannabinoids.

Endocannabinoid regulation of appetitive behavior

Cannabis has been used for recreational purposes for thousands of years, and its effects on appetite have been well recognized.1 In colloquial terms, getting the ‘munchies’ means craving for food, particularly sweets. Endocannabinoids are endogenous lipids that bind to and activate the same receptor which mediates the effects of plant-derived cannabinoids. The two most widely studied endocannabinoids are arachidonoyl ethanolamide, called anandamide2 and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG).3, 4 The discovery of these substances raised the obvious question: are endocannabinoids orexigenic and are they involved in the physiologic regulation of appetite and energy homeostasis? The present paper provides a brief overview of the central appetitive and peripheral metabolic effects of endocannabinoids. For more detail, the reader is referred to recent excellent reviews on this topic.5, 6, 7

An important step toward understanding the biological role of endocannabinoids was the introduction by the sanofi-aventis company of selective cannabinoid receptor antagonists for both major types of cannabinoid receptor:8, 9 the CB1 receptor expressed at very high levels in the brain10 but also present in various peripheral tissues,11 and CB2 receptors expressed predominantly in immune and hematopoietic cells.12 In the late 1990s, several studies have demonstrated that treatment with the CB1 selective antagonist, now called rimonabant, reduces food intake in rodents,13, 14, 15 and both anandamide16, 17 and 2-AG18 were found to stimulate food intake. However, it was not possible to conclude that the effect of rimonabant was due to blocking of the tonic orexigenic effect of an endocannabinoid because of the well-known inverse agonist properties of rimonabant.19, 20 This problem can be circumvented through the use of mice deficient in CB1 receptors. The mouse strain preferred for studies of obesity is the C57Bl6, a hedonic strain with high preference for both palatable food and a propensity to develop obesity when maintained on a high-fat diet. CB1 receptor knockout mice developed by Zimmer et al.21 had been backcrossed to a C57Bl6 background, and heterozygote breeding pairs yielded CB1 knockout mice and wild-type littermates used as controls in a study to determine the role of endocannabinoids and CB1 receptors in the control of food intake.22

When food intake was measured in such mice under free-feeding conditions, there was no difference between basal food intake in knockout and wild-type mice.23 However, when appetite was increased by fasting for 24 h prior to testing, the hunger-induced increase in food intake was much greater in wild-type than in knockout mice.22 Furthermore, when these fasted mice were pretreated with 3 mg/kg rimonabant 10 min prior to the test period, food intake in the wild-type animals was reduced to the same level as seen in the knockouts, in which rimonabant was ineffective.23 The observed parallel displacement of the cumulative food intake curve in wild-type mice treated with rimonabant means that all of the reduction occurred in the first hour of testing. This suggests that rimonabant acts on the appetitive rather than the consummatory phase of food intake. These findings clearly indicate that a part of the hunger-induced increase in food intake is mediated by endocannabinoids acting via CB1 receptors.22

Hyperphagia, which can be induced by food restriction in normal animals, is present in the early stages of genetically determined obesity, where the appetite suppressing effect of leptin is missing because of the absence of leptin, such as in the ob/ob mice, or a defect in leptin signaling, such as in db/db mice or Zucker (fa/fa) rats. In young ob/ob and db/db mice, rimonabant treatment reduced food intake even when the animals had free access to food prior to testing.22 This suggests that in these animals, the activity of the endocannabinoid system is increased and contributes to their hyperphagia. Indeed, the hypothalamic levels of endocannabinoids, measured using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, were found elevated in db/db mice and in Zucker rats compared to their respective lean controls.22 Furthermore, the hypothalamic levels of anandamide were markedly reduced when ob/ob mice were treated with leptin.22 These findings suggest a hypothalamic site of action for the orexigenic effects of endocannabinoids.

Hypothalamic site(s) of action are also suggested by findings that microinjection of anandamide into the dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus increases food intake in rats,24 and endocannabinoid levels in the hypothalamus decrease during feeding18 and increase during short-term fasting.18, 25 In rats made tolerant to Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), rimonabant suppressed food-maintained operant responses and hypothalamic metabolism, measured by 2-deoxyglucose uptake.26 CB1 receptors are expressed in areas of the hypothalamus involved in appetite control, such as the paraventricular nucleus (PVN), where they are expressed in CRH- and CART-containing neurons, and in the lateral hypothalamus, where they are present in orexin- and melanin concentrating hormone (MCH)-containing neurons.27 This latter site is of particular interest, as orexin- and MCH neurons also express functional leptin receptors,28, 29 and they have dense projections to dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area,30 where they modulate the mesolimbic dopaminergic pathway involved in food reward. Thus, they are a likely site for the proposed leptin/endocannabinoid interaction in the control of food intake,22 and could also represent a site of integration of hypothalamic and extrahypothalamic structures involved in the orexigenic effect of endocannabinoids. However, activation of hypothalamic centers, such as the PVN, by endocannabinoids may also occur indirectly via CB1 receptors on peripheral afferent nerve terminals,31 most likely located in the GI tract. Such an ‘indirect’ pathway is compatible with recent findings that CB1 mRNA is present in cholecystokinin (CCK)-containing neurons in the nodose ganglion, where CB1 mRNA expression is upregulated by fasting and downregulated by refeeding.32 This latter effect could be mimicked by the satiety hormone CCK, which may thus suppress feeding indirectly via reducing orexigenic signaling via CB1.32

Endocannabinoids and CB1 receptors are integral components of the mesolimbic reward pathway,33 and cannabinoids are known to increase the taste for palatable food.14, 34 Not surprisingly then, sites in the limbic forebrain have also been implicated in their orexigenic effects. Alterations in endocannabinoid levels in response to feeding status were more pronounced in the limbic forebrain than in the hypothalamus,18 and rimonabant suppressed 2-deoxyglucose uptake in the limbic forebrain of rats even in the absence of tolerance to THC, when no changes were observed in the hypothalamus.26 In rats, a high-fat diet-induced downregulation of CB1 receptors, interpreted to indicate increased endocannabinoid activity, was detected in several regions of the limbic forebrain including the nucleus accumbens, but not in the hypothalamus.35 Additionally, cannabinoids can increase the intake of palatable foods by acting at sites in the brainstem,36 which are known to have reciprocal neural connections with forebrain limbic structures.37

The adipocyte-derived hormone leptin suppresses appetite indirectly by increasing the expression of anorexigenic mediators, such as alpha-MSH38 and decreasing the expression of orexigenic factors, such as neuropeptide Y.39 The increased tissue levels of endocannabinoids in animals with defective leptin signaling therefore suggest that leptin may negatively regulate the orexigenic endocannabinoids. Indeed, in preliminary experiments, we found that in mice with DIO, elevated plasma leptin levels were associated with marked reductions in tissue levels of anandamide in the hypothalamus, the amygdala, and the limbic forebrain, but not in the cerebellum.

Endocannabinoids regulate peripheral energy metabolism

It is well recognized that energy intake and utilization are regulated in a coordinated fashion, and factors involved in the central regulation of appetite may also affect peripheral energy metabolism.40 For example, the appetite-reducing hormone leptin also regulates the activity of stearoyl coenzyme-A desaturase in the liver, the enzyme involved in fatty acid desaturation.41 Studies with rimonabant indicated that chronic treatment of mice with diet-induced obesity reduced appetite transiently but caused a sustained reduction in body weight.42 This suggests that factors other than appetite must be involved in the weight-reducing effect of rimonabant. Further evidence for this came from observations that mice lacking CB1 receptors are resistant to diet-induced obesity even though their total energy intake is similar to that of wild-type littermates, which do become obese on the same diet.43, 44 When C57Bl6 mice are placed on a high-fat/high-carbohydrate diet, they become obese in 3–4 months: they gain weight and their adiposity index is increased, indicating increased adipose mass. These changes are associated with hyperleptinemia and elevated plasma insulin levels, reduced plasma adiponectin, and elevated plasma triglycerides,44 changes compatible with the presence of the metabolic syndrome. In contrast, CB1 knockouts on the same high-fat diet do not gain weight or increase their fat deposits, and their plasma leptin levels also remain largely unchanged compared to CB1 knockouts on regular chow, even though their total energy intake during the 4 month period is not different from the intake of the obese wild-type mice on the same high-fat diet.44 This clearly indicates that a CB1-mediated mechanism other than increase in appetite must be involved in the development of DIO. Indeed, adipocytes have been found to express CB1 receptors,27, 45 stimulation of which may affect lipid metabolism through regulating the level of adiponectin production45 or by increasing lipoprotein lipase activity.27 The latter study also demonstrated that CB1 knockout mice are lean and display hypophagia early in their lives. As they get older, their food intake becomes normal but their energy expenditure is increased as compared to their wild-type littermates.27

However, the role of adipose tissue in lipogenesis is minor compared to that of the liver.46 In a recent study, the tissue mRNA level of the lipogenic transcription factor sterol response element-binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c) was consistently lower in both liver and adipose tissue from CB1−/− compared to wild-type mice, suggesting that SREBP1c expression may be tonically increased by endocannabinoids acting at CB1 receptors.44 SREBP1c regulates the expression of genes involved in fatty acid synthesis, both acetyl coenzyme carboxylase-1 (ACC1) and fatty acid synthase (FAS),47 and treatment of normal mice with the potent CB1 agonist HU-210 (20 ng/g) was found to increase the hepatic mRNA levels for SREBP1c, ACC1, and FAS, which could be prevented by pretreatment with 3 μg/g rimonabant.44

As a functional correlate of increased FAS gene expression, de novo hepatic fatty acid synthesis, as analyzed by measuring the incorporation of tritium into fatty acids in the liver following intrahepatic injection of 3H2O, was significantly increased by HU-210 treatment. Again, this effect was prevented by pretreatment with 3 μg/g rimonabant, and it was absent in CB1−/− mice. The CB1-mediated increase in fatty acid synthesis could be reproduced in isolated hepatocytes from wild-type mice, which strongly suggested that the receptors mediating this effect were located in the liver.44 This was then verified by multiple approaches, including RT–PCR, in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and Western blotting.44 The latter technique required the use of purified liver plasma membranes because of the very low level of hepatic CB1 receptors, which may have been the reason why earlier studies failed to detect CB1 message or protein in liver tissue.48 Interestingly, CB1 receptors have been recently detected in rat liver stellate cells49 as well as rat hepatocytes maintained in organoid culture.50

The resistance of CB1-deficient mice to diet-induced obesity also manifested in the absence of fatty liver in these animals, whereas wild-type mice on the same high-fat diet developed fatty liver.44 The striking difference between wild-type and CB1−/− mice in their response to high-fat diet suggests a role for CB1 in the hepatic lipogenic response to high-fat diet. Indeed, when wild-type mice were tested 3 weeks following the initiation of the high-fat diet, before a significant effect on body weight could be detected, the basal level of de novo fatty acid synthesis was markedly increased compared to that in lean controls, and pretreatment of the mice on the high-fat diet with 3 μg/g rimonabant significantly reduced the rate of fatty acid synthesis.44 In mice killed at the same time, the hepatic levels of anandamide were elevated threefold compared to the lean controls, with no difference in the levels of 2-AG. The hepatic level of CB1 receptors, quantified in Western blots of purified liver plasma membranes, was also markedly increased in mice on the high-fat diet.44 These findings indicate that intake of a high-fat diet activates the hepatic endocannabinoid system, which contributes to the increased lipogenesis.

Since total energy intake was not different in wild-type and CB1−/− mice on the high-fat diet,43, 44 the absence of CB1 must be associated with increased energy expenditure. Exposing C57Bl6 mice to a high-fat diet decreases energy expenditure, as documented by indirect calorimetry.51 This accounts for the increase in feed efficiency in wild-type mice on a high-fat compared to normal diet, whereas in CB1−/− mice feed efficiency was not significantly altered by high-fat diet (Figure 1). One of the factors that could contribute to this difference is adiponectin, the adipocyte-derived hormone that promotes fatty acid β-oxidation.52 Plasma adiponectin levels declined significantly in wild-type mice with diet-induced obesity, whereas the same high-fat diet failed to affect plasma adiponectin levels in CB1−/− mice,44 suggesting that energy expenditure was not reduced in the latter group.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Increased feed efficiency induced by a high-fat diet in wild-type, but not in CB1 knockout mice. Male and female CB1−/− mice and their wild-type littermates (CB1+/+) were fed regular mouse chow or a high-fat diet from age 4 to 14 weeks, as described.44 Feed efficiency was calculated as the grams of body weight gained divided by the kcal consumed during this period, times 100. *Indicates significant difference (P<0.005) from the corresponding group on normal diet. N=6–10 per group.

Fatty acid metabolism in hypothalamic neurons acts as a sensor of nutrient availability,53 and its pharmacological modulation influences appetitive behavior.54 Interestingly, activation of CB1 was found to increase hypothalamic SREBP1c and FAS mRNA levels, and this effect was abrogated in animals pretreated with 3 μg/g rimonabant, although rimonabant alone did not reduce SREBP1c and FAS mRNA levels.44 Fasting followed by refeeding with a high-carbohydrate diet is a potent inducer of SREBP1c and FAS gene expression.55 In mice subjected to a cycle of fasting/refeeding, the elevated basal levels of SREBP1c and FAS mRNA were significantly reduced by treatment with 3μg/g rimonabant at the beginning of the refeeding period, which also reduced food intake. Although fatty acid synthesis was not measured directly in the hypothalamus, these findings suggest that the increase in food intake following fasting may involve a CB1-mediated modulation of the fatty acid synthetic pathway.

Recent work has highlighted the key role of the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) as a sensor of cellular energy status. AMP-activated protein kinase is activated by an increase in AMP:ATP ratio triggered by a decline in cellular ATP, and results in increased food intake.56 AMP-activated protein kinase activation also inhibits lipogenesis and increases fatty acid oxidation, by phosphorylating and thus inhibiting the activity of ACC1, the rate-limiting enzyme in fatty acid synthesis. The resulting decrease in malonyl CoA represents a metabolic switch that results in reduced fatty acid synthesis and increased β-oxidation. Interestingly, a recent study provided evidence for the regulation of AMPK by cannabinoids, which were found to stimulate AMPK activity in the hypothalamus and myocardium, and to inhibit it in the liver and adipose tissue, via activation of CB1.57 These effects are compatible with the proposed CB1-mediated increase in hepatic lipogenesis and the increase in food intake via activation of hypothalamic CB1. It would be interesting to see whether a similar mechanism is present in extrahypothalamic brain regions implicated in the orexigenic effects of cannabinoids. The reason why activation of CB1 results in inhibition of AMPK activity in some tissues but activation in others,57 also remains to be determined. Figure 2 is a schematic representation of the proposed targets of cannabinoids in the fatty acid synthesis/β-oxidation pathways in the liver.44, 57

Figure 2
Figure 2

Schematic representation of cannabinoid modulation of fatty acid synthesis and β-oxidation. In the liver, cannabinoids inhibit AMPK,57 which results in reduced phosphorylation, thus activation of ACC1. Cannabinoids also increase the expression of ACC1 and FAS.44 All of these effects are likely involved in the observed increase in fatty acid synthesis.44 Fatty acid β-oxidation is likely reduced because of an increase in malonyl-CoA, although this has not yet been directly tested.

The studies described in the second section indicate that endocannabinoids acting at CB1 receptors in adipose tissue and liver regulate peripheral energy metabolism. The findings that the AMPK/ACC1/FAS pathway, which controls fatty acid synthesis and β-oxidation, is targeted by cannabinoids in both the liver and the hypothalamus suggest that a common molecular pathway is involved in the central regulation of appetite and the control of peripheral energy metabolism by the endocannabinoid system.

References

  1. 1

    Abel EL . Effects of marijuana on the solution of anagrams, memory and appetite. Nature 1971; 231: 260–261.

  2. 2

    Devane WA, Hanus L, Breuer A, Pertwee RG, Stevenson LA, Griffin G et al. Isolation and structure of a brain constituent that binds to the cannabinoid receptor. Science 1992; 258: 1946–1949.

  3. 3

    Sugiura T, Kondo S, Sukagawa A, Nakane S, Shinoda A, Itoh K et al. 2-Arachidonoylglycerol: a possible endogenous cannabinoid receptor ligand in brain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1995; 215: 89–97.

  4. 4

    Mechoulam R, Ben Shabat S, Hanus L, Ligumsky M, Kaminski NE, Schatz AR et al. Identification of an endogenous 2-monoglyceride, present in canine gut, that binds to cannabinoid receptors. Biochem Pharmacol 1995; 50: 83–90.

  5. 5

    Sharkey KA, Pittman QJ . Central and peripheral signaling mechanisms involved in endocannabinoid regulation of feeding: a perspective on the munchies. Sci STKE 2005; 277: pe15.

  6. 6

    Di Marzo V, Matias I . Endocannabinoid control of food intake and energy balance. Nat Neurosci 2005; 8: 585–589.

  7. 7

    Pagotto U, Marsicano G, Cota D, Lutz B, Pasquali R . The emerging role of the endocannabinoid system in endocrine regulation and energy balance. Endocr Rev 2006; 27: 73–100.

  8. 8

    Rinaldi-Carmona M, Barth F, Heaulme M, Shire D, Calandra B, Congy C et al. SR141716A, a potent and selective antagonist of the brain cannabinoid receptor. FEBS Lett 1994; 350: 240–244.

  9. 9

    Rinaldi-Carmona M, Barth F, Millan J, Derocq JM, Casellas P, Congy C et al. SR 144528, the first potent and selective antagonist of the CB2 cannabinoid receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1998; 284: 644–650.

  10. 10

    Matsuda LA, Lolait SJ, Brownstein MJ, Young AC, Bonner TI . Structure of a cannabinoid receptor and functional expression of the cloned cDNA. Nature 1990; 346: 561–564.

  11. 11

    Palmer SL, Thakur GA, Makriyannis A . Cannabinergic ligands. Chem Phys Lipids 2002; 121: 3–19.

  12. 12

    Munro S, Thomas KL, Abu-Shaar M . Molecular characterization of a peripheral receptor for cannabinoids. Nature 1993; 365: 61–65.

  13. 13

    Colombo G, Agabio R, Diaz G, Lobina C, Reali R, Gessa GL . Appetite suppression and weight loss after the cannabinoid antagonist SR 141716. Life Sci 1998; 63: PL113–PL117.

  14. 14

    Simiand J, Keane M, Keane PE, Soubrie P . SR 141716, a CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist, selectively reduces sweet food intake in marmoset. Behav Pharmacol 1998; 9: 179–181.

  15. 15

    Freedland CS, Poston JS, Porrino LJ . Effects of Sr141716A, a central cannabinoid receptor antagonist, on food-maintained responding. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2000; 67: 265–270.

  16. 16

    Williams CM, Kirkham TC . Anandamide induces overeating: mediation by central cannabinoid (CB1) receptors. Psychopharmcology 1999; 143: 315–317.

  17. 17

    Hao S, Avraham Y, Mechoulam R, Berry EM . Low dose anandamide affects food intake, cognitive function, neurotransmitter and corticosterone levels in diet-restricted mice. Eur J Pharmacol 2000; 392: 147–156.

  18. 18

    Kirkham TC, Williams CM, Fezza F, Di Marzo V . Endocannabinoid levels in rat limbic forebrain and hypothalamus in relation to fasting, feeding and satiation: stimulation of eating by 2-arachidonoyl glycerol. Br J Pharmacol 2002; 136: 550–557.

  19. 19

    Gifford AN, Ashby Jr CR . Electrically evoked acetylcholine release from hippocampal slices is inhibited by the cannabinoid receptor agonist, WIN 55212-2, and is potentiated by the cannabinoid antagonist, SR 141716A. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1996; 277: 1431–1436.

  20. 20

    Bouaboula M, Perrachon S, Milligan L, Canat X, Rinaldi-Carmona M, Portier M et al. A selective inverse agonist for central cannabinoid receptor inhibits mitogen-activated protein kinase activation stimulated by insulin or insulin-like growth factor 1. Evidence for a new model of receptor/ligand interactions. J Biol Chem 1997; 272: 22330–22339.

  21. 21

    Zimmer A, Zimmer AM, Hohmann AG, Herkenham M, Bonner TI . Increased mortality, hypoactivity, and hypoalgesia in cannabinoid CB1 receptor knockout mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 5780–5785.

  22. 22

    Di Marzo V, Goparaju SK, Wang L, Liu J, Batkai S, Jarai Z et al. Leptin-regulated endocannabinoids are involved in maintaining food intake. Nature 2001; 410: 822–825.

  23. 23

    Kunos G, Osei-Hyiaman D, Wang L, Liu J, Batkai S . Endocannabinods: novel lipid mediators involved in the neural control of appetite. In: Medeiros-Neto S, Halpern A, Bouchard C (eds). Progress in Obesity Research. John Libby Eurotext, Surrey, UK, 2002. pp 826–828.

  24. 24

    Jamshidi N, Taylor DA . Anandamide administration into the ventromedial hypothalamus stimulates appetite in rats. Br J Pharmacol 2001; 134: 1151–1154.

  25. 25

    Hanus L, Avraham Y, Ben-Shushan D, Zolotarev O, Berry EM, Mechoulam R . Short-term fasting and prolonged semistarvation have opposite effects on 2-AG levels in mouse brain. Brain Res 2003; 983: 144–151.

  26. 26

    Freedland CS, Whitlow CT, Smith HR, Porrino LJ . Functional consequences of the acute administration of the cannabinoid receptor antagonist, SR141716A, in cannabinoid-naive and -tolerant animals: a quantitative 2-[14C]deoxyglucose study. Brain Res 2003; 962: 169–179.

  27. 27

    Cota D, Marsicano G, Tschop M, Grubler Y, Flachskamm C, Schubert M et al. The endogenous cannabinoid system affects energy balance via central orexigenic drive and peripheral lipogenesis. J Clin Invest 2003; 112: 423–431.

  28. 28

    Iqbal J, Pompolo S, Murakami T, Grouzmann E, Sakurai T, Meister B et al. Immunohistochemical characterization of localization of long-form leptin receptor (OB-Rb) in neurochemically defined cells in the ovine hypothalamus. Brain Res 2001; 920: 55–64.

  29. 29

    Hübschle T, Thom E, Watson A, Roth J, Klaus S, meyerhof W . Leptin-induced nuclear translocation of STAT3 immunoreactivity in hypothalamic nuclei involved in body weight regulation. J Neurosci 2001; 21: 2413–2424.

  30. 30

    Fadel J, Deutch AY . Anatomical substrates of orexin-dopamine interactions: lateral hypothalamic projections to the ventral tegmental area. Neuroscience 2002; 111: 379–387.

  31. 31

    Gomez R, Navarro M, Ferrer B, Trigo JM, Bilbao A, Del Arco I et al. A peripheral mechanism for CB1 cannabinoid receptor-dependent modulation of feeding. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 9612–9617.

  32. 32

    Burdyga G, Lal S, Varro A, Dimaline R, Thompson DG, Dockray DG . Expression of cannabinoid CB1 receptors by vagal afferent neurons is inhibited by cholecystokinin. J Neurosci 2004; 24: 2708–2715.

  33. 33

    Gardner EL . Addictive potential of cannabinoids: the underlying neurobiology. Chem Phys Lipids 2002; 121: 267–290.

  34. 34

    Higgs S, Williams CM, Kirkham TC . Cannabinoid influences on palatability: microstructural analysis of sucrose drinking after delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, anandamide, 2-arachidonoyl glycerol and SR141716. Psychopharmacology 2003; 165: 370–377.

  35. 35

    Harrold JA, Elliott JC, King PJ, Widdowson PS, Williams G . Down-regulation of cannabinoid-1 (CB-1) receptors in specific extrahypothalamic regions of rats with dietary obesity: a role for endogenous cannabinoids in driving appetite for palatable food? Brain Res 2002; 952: 232–238.

  36. 36

    Miller CC, Murray TF, Freeman KG, Edwards GL . Cannabinoid agonist, CP 55,940, facilitates intake of palatable foods when injected into the hindbrain. Physiol Behav 2004; 80: 611–616.

  37. 37

    Saper CB . The central autonomic nervous system: conscious visceral perception and autonomic pattern generation. Annu Rev Neurosci 2002; 25: 433–469.

  38. 38

    Seeley RJ, Yagaloff KA, Fisher SL, Burn P, Thiele TE, van Dijk G et al. Melanocortin receptors in leptin effects. Nature 1997; 390: 349.

  39. 39

    Stephens TW, Basinski M, Bristow PK, Bue-Valleskey JM, Burgett SG, Craft L et al. The role of neuropeptide Y in the antiobesity action of the obese gene product. Nature 1995; 377: 530–532.

  40. 40

    Seeley RJ, Woods SC . Monitoring of stored and available fuel by the cNS: implications for obesity. Nat Neurosci 2003; 4: 901–909.

  41. 41

    Cohen P, Miyazaki M, Socci ND, Hagge-Greenberg A, Liedtke W, Soukas AA et al. Role for stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1 in leptin-mediated weight loss. Science 2002; 297: 240–243.

  42. 42

    Ravinet Trillou C, Arnone M, Delgorge C, Gonalons N, Keane P, Maffrand JP et al. Anti-obesity effect of SR141716, a CB1 receptor antagonist, in diet-induced obese mice. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2003; 284: R345–R353.

  43. 43

    Ravinet Trillou C, Delgorge C, Menet C, Arnone M, Soubrie P . CB1 cannabinoid receptor knockout in mice leads to leanness, resistance to diet-induced obesity and enhanced leptin sensitivity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004; 28: 640–648.

  44. 44

    Osei-Hyiaman D, DePetrillo M, Pacher P, Liu J, Radaeva S, Batkai S et al. Endocannabinoid activation at hepatic CB1 receptors stimulates fatty acid synthesis and contributes to diet-induced obesity. J Clin Invest 2005; 115: 1298–1305.

  45. 45

    Bensaid M, Gary-Bobo M, Esclangon A, Maffrand JP, Le Fur G, Oury-Donat F et al. The cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716 increases Acrp30 mRNA expression in adipose tissue of obese fa/fa rats and in cultured adipocyte cells. Mol Pharmacol 2003; 63: 908–914.

  46. 46

    Diraison F, Yankah V, Letexier D, Dusserre E, Jones P, Beylot M . Differences in the regulation of adipose tissue and liver lipogenesis by carbohydrates in humans. J Lipid Res 2003; 44: 846–853.

  47. 47

    Brown MS, Goldstein JL . Sterol regulatory element binding proteins (SREBPs): controllers of lipid synthesis and cellular uptake. Nutr Rev 1998; 56: S1–S3.

  48. 48

    Porcella A, Marchese G, Casu MA, Rocchitta A, Lai LM . Evidence for functional CB1 cannabinoid receptor expressed in the rat thyroid. Eur J Endocrinol 2002; 147: 255–261.

  49. 49

    Siegmund SV, Uchinami H, Osawa Y, Brenner DA, Schwabe RF . Anandamide induces necrosis in primary hepatic stellate cells. Hepatology 2005; 41: 1085–1095.

  50. 50

    Michalopoulos GK, Bowen WC, Kule K, Luo J . HGF-, EGF-, and dexamethasone-induced gene expression patterns during formation of tissue in hepatic organoid cultures. Gene Expression 2003; 11: 55–75.

  51. 51

    Hu CC, Qing K, Chen Y . Diet-induced chages in stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 expression in obesity-prone and -resistant mice. Obes Res 2004; 12: 1264–1270.

  52. 52

    Yamauchi T, Kamon J, Minokoshi Y, Ito Y, Waki H, Uchida S et al. Adiponectin stimulates glucose utilization and fatty-acid oxidation by activating AMP-activated protein kinase. Nat Med 2002; 8: 1288–1295.

  53. 53

    Obici S, Feng Z, Arduini A, Conti R, Rossetti R . Inhibition of hypothalamic carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1 decreases food intake and glucose production. Nat Med 2003; 9: 756–761.

  54. 54

    Kim EK, Miller I, Aja S, Landree LE, Pinn M, McFadden J et al. C75, a fatty acid synthase inhibitor, reduces food intake via hypothalamic AMP-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 19970–19976.

  55. 55

    Paulaskis JD, Sul HS . Cloning and expression of mouse fatty acid synthase and other specific mRNA. Developmental and hormonal regulation in 3T3-L1 cells. J Biol Chem 1988; 263: 7049–7054.

  56. 56

    Minokoshi Y, Alquier T, Furakawa N, Kim YB, Lee A, Xue B et al. AMP-kinase regulates food intake by responding to hormonal and nutrient signals in the hypothalamus. Nature 2004; 428: 569–574.

  57. 57

    Kola B, Hubina E, Tucci SA, Kirkham TC, Garcia EA, Mitchell SE et al. Cannabinoids and ghrelin have both central and peripheral metabolic and cardiac effects via AMP-activated kinase. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 25196–25201.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Physiologic Studies, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

    • D Osei-Hyiaman
    • , J Harvey-White
    • , S Bátkai
    •  & G Kunos

Authors

  1. Search for D Osei-Hyiaman in:

  2. Search for J Harvey-White in:

  3. Search for S Bátkai in:

  4. Search for G Kunos in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G Kunos.

About this article

Publication history

Published

Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803276

Further reading