Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Effects of manipulated palatability on appetite depend on restraint and disinhibition scores from the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The present study evaluated the effects of dietary restraint on short-term appetite in response to manipulated palatability.

DESIGN: The effects of palatability on appetite during a lunchtime meal were assessed by contrasting intake of a bland and palatable version of a simple food (within subject). To test how responses to palatability varied with restraint, these meals consumed by women were classified according to restraint (R) and disinhibition (D) scores from the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) as high R/high D (HR–HD), high R/low D (HR–LD), low R/high D (LR–HD) and low R/low D (LR–LD).

SUBJECTS: A total of 40 normal-weight women subdivided into four groups based on TFEQ scores.

MEASUREMENTS: The overall intake, appetite and hedonic ratings before, during and after the meal.

RESULTS: All groups ate similar amounts of the bland food, but the LR–HD group ate significantly more of the palatable version than the other groups, whereas HR–LD did not increase intake in response to palatability. Hunger increased on tasting the palatable food in all but the HR–LD group, and this group ended both meals more hungry/less full than the others.

CONCLUSION: Women classified as HR–LD were unresponsive to manipulated palatability, whereas those classified as LR–HD were over-responsive. These findings imply that some individuals are prone to over-respond to palatability and so are at greater risk of developing obesity, whereas others are able to resist the effects of palatability and so successfully self-restrict their food intake. Implications for obesity are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Herman CP, Polivy J . A boundary model for the regulation of eating. In: Stunkard AJ, Stellar E (eds.) Eating and its disorders. Raven Press: New York; 1984. pp 141–156.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ruderman . Dietary restraint: a theoretical and empirical review. Psychol Bull 1986; 99: 247–262.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Herman CP, Polivy J . Restrained eating. In: Stunkard AJ (ed.) Obesity. Saunders: Philadelphia; 1980. pp 208–225.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Van Strein T, Frijters JE, Bergers GPA, Defares PB . Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire for assessment of restrained emotional and external eating behaviour. Int J Eating Disord 1986; 5: 295–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stunkard AJ, Messick S . The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. J Psychosom Res 1985; 29: 71–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wardle J, Beales S . Restraint and food intake: an experimental study of eating patterns in the laboratory and in normal life. Behav Res Ther 1987; 25: 179–185.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dritschel B, Cooper PJ, Charnock D . A problematic counter-regulation experiment: implications for the link between dietary restraint and overeating. Int J Eating Disord 1993; 13: 297–304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Morgan PJ, Jeffrey DB . Restraint, weight suppression and self-report reliability: how much do you really weigh? Addict Behav 1999; 24: 679–682.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Blanchard FA, Frost RO . Two factors of restraint: concern for dieting and weight fluctuation. Behav Res Ther 1983; 21: 259–267.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lowe MR . Dietary concern, weight fluctuation and weight status: further explorations of the restraint scale. Behav Res Ther 1984; 22: 243–248.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heatherton TF, Herman CP, Polivy J, King GA, McGree ST . The (mis)measurement of restraint: an analysis of conceptual and psychometric issues. J Abnorm Psychol 1988; 100: 78–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lowe MR, Maycock B . Restraint, disinhibition, hunger and negative affect eating. Addict Behav 1988; 13: 369–377.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tuschl RJ . From dietary restraint to binge eating: some theoretical considerations. Appetite 1990; 14: 105–109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Westenhoefer J . Dietary restraint and disinhibition: is restraint a homogenous construct. Appetite 1991; 16: 45–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Westenhoefer J, Broeckmann P, Munch A-K, Pudel V . Cognitive control of eating behaviour and the disinhibition effect. Appetite 1994; 23: 27–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Herman CP, Mack D . Restrained and unrestrained eating. J Personality 1975; 43: 647–660.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Spencer JA, Fremouw WJ . Binge eating as a function of restraint and weight classification. J Abnorm Psychol 1979; 88: 262–267.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wardle J, Steptoe A, Oliver G, Lipsey Z . Stress, dietary restraint and food intake. J Psychosom Res 2000; 48: 195–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ruderman AJ . Dysphoric mood and overeating: a taste of restraint theory's disinhibition hypothesis. J Abnorm Psychol 1985; 94: 78–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Polivy J, Herman CP . The effects of alcohol on eating behavior: disinhibition or sedation? Addict Behav 1976; 1: 121–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yeomans MR . Taste, palatability and the control of appetite. Proc Nutr Soc 1998; 57: 609–615.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Maffeis C . Aetiology of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents. Eur J Pediatr 2000; 159: S35–S44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. McCrory MA, Suen VMM, Roberts SB . Biobehavioral influences on energy intake and adult weight gain. J Nutr 2002; 132: 3830S–3834S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Walker ARP, Walker BF, Adam F . Nutrition, diet, physical activity, smoking and longevity: from primitive hunter–gatherer to present passive consumer—how far can we go? Nutrition 2003; 19: 169–173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bellisle F, Lucas F, Amrani R, Le Magnen J . Deprivation, palatability and the micro-structure of meals in human subjects. Appetite 1984; 5: 85–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bobroff EM, Kissileff H . Effects of changes in palatability on food intake and the cumulative food intake curve of man. Appetite 1986; 7: 85–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yeomans MR . Palatability and the microstructure of eating in humans: the appetiser effect. Appetite 1996; 27: 119–133.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yeomans MR, Lee MD, Gray RW, French SJ . Effects of test-meal palatability on compensatory eating following disguised fat and carbohydrate preloads. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001; 25: 1215–1224.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yeomans MR, Gray RW, Mitchell CJ, True S . Independent effects of palatability and within-meal pauses on intake and subjective appetite in human volunteers. Appetite 1997; 29: 61–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tepper BJ . Dietary restraint and responsiveness to sensory-based food cues as measured by cephalic phase salivation and sensory specific satiety. Physiol Behav 1992; 52: 305–311.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Teff KL, Engelman K . Palatability and dietary restraint: effect on cephalic phase insulin release in women. Physiol Behav 1996; 60: 567–573.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rogers PJ, Hill AJ . Breakdown of dietary restraint following mere exposure to food stimuli: interrelationships between restraint, hunger, salivation, and food intake. Addict Behav 1989; 14: 387–397.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. De Castro JM, Bellisle F, Dalix A-M, Pearcey SM . Palatability and intake relationships in free-living humans: characterization and independence of influence in North Americans. Physiol Behav 2000; 70: 343–350.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yeomans MR . Rating changes over the course of meals: what do they tell us about motivation to eat? Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2000; 24: 249–259.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Yeomans MR, Lartamo S, Procter EL, Lee MD, Gray RW . The actual, but not labelled, fat content of a soup preload alters short-term appetite in healthy men. Physiol Behav 2001; 73: 533–540.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gray RW, French SJ, Robinson TM, Yeomans MR . Dissociation of the effects of preload volume and energy content on subjective appetite and food intake. Physiol Behav 2002; 76: 57–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kissileff HR, Kilngsberg G, Van Italie TB . Universal eating monitor for continuous recording of solid or liquid consumption in man. Am J Physiol 1980; 238: R14–R22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Haynes CL . The interactive effects of dietary restraint and disinhibition on ingestive behaviour. University of Sussex: Brighton; 2001. 411 pp.

  39. Yanovski SZ, Leet M, Yanovski JA, Flood M, Gold PW, Kissileff HR, Walsh BT . Food selection and intake of obese women with binge-eating disorder. Am J Clin Nutr 1992; 56: 975–980.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Peterson CB, Mitchell JE, Engbloom S, Nugent S, Mussell MP, Crow SJ, Miller JP . Binge eating disorder with and without a history of purging symptoms. Int J Eating Disord 1998; 24: 251–257.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Howard CE, Porzelius LK . The role of dieting in binge eating disorder: etiology and treatment implications. Clin Psychol Rev 1999; 19: 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Knight LJ, Boland FJ . Restrained eating: an experimental disentanglement of the disinhibiting variables of perceived calories and food type. J Abnorm Psychol 1989; 98: 412–420.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Stirling LJ, Yeomans MR . Effects of exposure to a forbidden food on eating in restrained, unrestrained women. Int J Eating Dis, (in press).

  44. Steere J, Cooper PJ . The effects on eating of dietary restraint, anxiety, hunger. Int J Eating Disord 1993; 13: 211–219.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partly funded by an undergraduate bursary from the Nuffield Foundation to Heather Tovey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M R Yeomans.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yeomans, M., Tovey, H., Tinley, E. et al. Effects of manipulated palatability on appetite depend on restraint and disinhibition scores from the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire. Int J Obes 28, 144–151 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802483

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802483

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links