Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Within- and between-laboratory precision in the measurement of body volume using air displacement plethysmography and its effect on body composition assessment

International Journal of Obesity volume 28, pages 80–90 (2004)Cite this article

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the extent of within- and between-laboratory precision in body volume (BV) measurements using air displacement plethysmography (ADP), the BOD POD body composition system, and to interpret any such variability in terms of body composition estimates.

DESIGN: Repeated test procedures of BV assessment using the BOD POD ADP were reproduced at two laboratories for the estimation of precision, both within and between laboratories.

SUBJECTS: In total, 30 healthy adult volunteers, 14 men (age, 19–48 y; body mass index (BMI), 19.7–30.3 kg/m2) and 16 women (age, 19–40 y; BMI, 16.3–35.7 kg/m2), were each subjected to two test procedures at both laboratories. Two additional volunteers were independently subjected to 10 repeated test procedures at both laboratories.

MEASUREMENTS: Repeated measurements of BV, uncorrected for the effects of isothermal air in the lungs and the surface area artifact, were obtained using the BOD POD ADP, with the identical protocol being faithfully applied at both laboratories. Uncorrected BV measurements were adjusted to give estimates of actual BV that were used to calculate body density (body weight (BWt)/actual BV) from which estimates of body composition were derived. The differences between repeated BV measurements or body composition estimates were used to assess within-laboratory precision (repeatability), as standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation; the differences between measurements reproduced at each laboratory were used to determine between-laboratory precision (reproducibility), as bias and 95% limits of agreement (from SD of the differences between laboratories).

RESULTS: The extent of within-laboratory methodological precision for BV (uncorrected and actual) was variable according to subject, sample group and laboratory conditions (range of SD, 0.04–0.13 l), and was mostly due to within-individual biological variability (typically 78–99%) rather than to technical imprecision. There was a significant (P<0.05) bias between laboratories for the 10 repeats on the two independent subjects (up to 0.29 l). Although no significant bias (P=0.077) was evident for the sample group of 30 volunteers (−0.05 l), the 95% limits of agreement were considerable (−0.68 to 0.58 l). The effects of this variability in BV on body composition were relatively greater: for example, within-laboratory precision (SD) for body fat as % BWt was between 0.56 and 1.34% depending on the subject and laboratory; the bias (−0.59%) was not significant between laboratories, but there were large 95% limits of agreement (−3.67 to 2.50%).

CONCLUSION: Within-laboratory precision for each BOD POD instrument was reasonably good, but was variable according to the prevailing conditions. Although the bias between the two instruments was not significant for the BV measurements, implying that they can be used interchangeably for groups of similar subjects, the relatively large 95% limits of agreement indicate that greater consideration may be needed for assessing individuals with different ADP instruments. Therefore, use of a single ADP instrument is apparently preferable when assessing individuals on a longitudinal basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McCrory MA, Gomez TD, Bernauer EM, Mole PA . Evaluation of a new air displacement plethysmograph for measuring human body composition. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27: 1686–1691.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dempster P, Aitkens S . A new air displacement method for the determination of human body composition. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27: 1692–1697.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Biaggi RR, Vollman MW, Nies MA, Brener CE, Flakoll PJ, Levenhagen DK, Sun M, Karabulut Z, Chen KY . Comparison of air-displacement plethysmography with hydrostatic weighing and bioelectrical impedance analysis for the assessment of body composition in healthy adults. Am J Clin Nutr 1999; 69: 898–903.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Collins MA, Millard-Stafford ML, Sparling PB, Snow TK, Rosskopf LB, Webb SA, Omer J . Evaluation of the BOD POD for assessing body fat in collegiate football players. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: 1350–1356.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Demerath EW, Guo SS, Chumlea WC, Towne B, Roche AF, Siervogel RM . Comparison of percent body fat estimates using air displacement plethysmography and hydrodensitometry in adults and children. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002; 26: 389–397.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dewit O, Fuller NJ, Fewtrell MS, Elia M, Wells JCK . Whole body air displacement plethysmography compared with hydrodensitometry for body composition analysis. Arch Dis Child 2000; 82: 159–164.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fields DA, Wilson GD, Gladden LB, Hunter GR, Pascoe DD, Goran MI . Comparison of the BOD POD with the four-compartment model in adult females. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 1605–1610.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Levenhagen DK, Borel MB, Welch DC, Piasecki JH, Piasecki DP, Chen KY, Flakoll PJ . A comparison of air displacement plethysmography with three other techniques to determine body fat in healthy adults. JPEN 1999; 23: 293–299.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Millard-Stafford ML, Collins MA, Evans EM, Snow TK, Cureton KJ, Rosskopf LB . Use of air displacement plethysmography for estimating body fat in a four-component model. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 1311–1317.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nunez C, Kovera AJ, Pietrobelli A, Heshka S, Horlick M, Kehayias JJ, Wang Z, Heymsfield SB . Body composition in children and adults by air displacement plethysmography. Eur J Clin Nutr 1999; 53: 382–387.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sardinha LB, Lohman TG, Teixeira PJ, Guedes DP, Going SB . Comparison of air displacement plethysmography with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and 3 field methods for estimating body composition in middle-aged men. Am J Clin Nutr 1998; 68: 786–793.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wagner DR, Heyward VH, Gibson AL . Validation of air displacement plethysmography for assessing body composition. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 1339–1344.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fields DA, Goran MI . Body composition techniques and the four-compartment model in children. J Appl Physiol 2000; 89: 613–620.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lockner DW, Heyward VH, Baumgartner RN, Jenkins KA . Comparison of air displacement plethysmography, hydrodensitometry, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessing body composition of children 10 to 18 years of age. Ann NY Acad Sci 2000; 904: 72–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fields DA, Goran MI, McCrory MA . Body-composition assessment via air-displacement plethysmography in adults and children: a review. Am J Clin Nutr 2002; 75: 453–467.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Siri WE . Body composition from fluid spaces and density: analysis of methods. In: Brozek J, Henschel A (eds) Techniques for measuring body composition. National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council: Washington, DC; 1961. pp 223–244.

    Google Scholar 

  17. McCrory MA, Mole PA, Gomez TD, Dewey KG, Bernauer EM . Body-composition by air-displacement plethysmography by using predicted and measured thoracic gas volumes. J Appl Physiol 1998; 84: 1475–1479.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wells JCK, Fuller NJ . Precision of measurement and body size in whole-body air-displacement plethysmography. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001; 25: 1161–1167.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Collins AL, McCarthy HD . Evaluation of factors determining the precision of body composition measurements by air-displacement plethysmography. Eur J Clin Nutr 2003; 57: 770–776.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. British Standards Institution. Precision of test methods. Part 1: Guide for the determination and reproducibility for a standard test method (BS5497, part 1). BSI: London; 1979.

  21. Bland JM, Altman DG . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; I: 307–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Withers RT, LaForgia J, Heymsfield SB . Critical appraisal of the estimation of body composition via two-, three-, and four-compartment models. Am J Hum Biol 1999; 11: 175–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gnaedinger RH, Reineke EP, Pearson AM, Van Huss WD, Wessel JA, Montoye HJ . Determination of body density by air displacement, helium dilution, and underwater weighing. Ann NY Acad Sci 1963; 110: 96–108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gundlach BL, Visscher GJW . The plethysmometric measurement of total body volume. Hum Biol 1986; 58: 783–799.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vescovi JD, Zimmerman SL, Miller WC, Hildebrandt L, Hammer RL, Fernall B . Evaluation of the BOD POD for estimating percentage body fat in a heterogeneous group of adult humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 2001; 85: 326–332.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Durnin JVGA, Taylor A . Replicability of measurements of density of the human body as determined by underwater weighing. J Appl Physiol 1960; 15: 142–144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mendez J, Lukaski HC . Variability of body density in ambulatory subjects measured at different days. Am J Clin Nutr 1981; 34: 78–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Going SB . Densitometry. In: Roche AF, Heymsfield SB, Lohman TG (eds). Human body composition. Human Kinetics Publishers: Champaign, IL; 1996. pp 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Deurenberg P, Westerterp KR, Velthuis-Te Wierik EJM . Between-laboratory comparison of densitometry and bio-electrical impedance measurements. Br J Nutr 1994; 71: 309–316.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lohman TG . Advances in body composition assessment. Current issues in exercise science, Monograph number 3. Human Kinetic Publishers: Champaign, IL; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Brozek J, Grande F, Anderson JT, Keys A . Densitometric analysis of body composition: revision of some quantitative assumptions. Ann NY Acad Sci 1963; 110: 113–140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Weyers AM, Mazzetti SA, Love DM, Gomez AL, Kraemer WJ, Volek JS . Comparison of methods for assessing body composition changes during weight loss. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34: 497–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Fuller NJ, Jebb SA, Laskey MA, Coward WA, Elia M . Four-component model for the assessment of body composition in humans: comparison with alternative methods, and evaluation of the density and hydration of fat-free mass. Clin Sci 1992; 82: 687–693.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wells JCK, Fuller NJ, Dewit O, Fewtrell MS, Elia M, Cole TJ . Four-component model of body composition in children: density and hydration of fat-free mass and comparison with simpler models. Am J Clin Nutr 1999; 69: 904–912.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Deborah Ridout of the Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, for expert statistical advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Human Sciences, London Metropolitan University, London, UK

    A L Collins, S Saunders & H D McCarthy

  2. MRC Childhood Nutrition Research Centre, Institute of Child Health, London, UK

    J E Williams & N J Fuller

Authors
  1. A L Collins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S Saunders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H D McCarthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J E Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. N J Fuller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A L Collins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Collins, A., Saunders, S., McCarthy, H. et al. Within- and between-laboratory precision in the measurement of body volume using air displacement plethysmography and its effect on body composition assessment. Int J Obes 28, 80–90 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802466

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802466

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links