Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Comparison of percent body fat estimates using air displacement plethysmography and hydrodensitometry in adults and children

International Journal of Obesity volume 26, pages 389–397 (2002)Cite this article

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to compare estimates of body density and percentage body fat from air displacement plethysmography (ADP) to those from hydrodensitometry (HD) in adults and children and to provide a review of similar recent studies.

METHODS: Body density and percentage body fat (% BF) were assessed by ADP and HD on the same day in 87 adults aged 18–69 y (41 males and 46 females) and 39 children aged 8–17 y (19 males and 20 females). Differences between measured and predicted thoracic gas volumes determined during the ADP procedure and the resultant effects of those differences on body composition estimates were also compared. In a subset of 50 individuals (31 adults and 19 children), reliability of ADP was measured and the relative ease or difficulty of ADP and HD were probed with a questionnaire.

RESULTS: The coefficient of reliability between %BF on day 1 and day 2 was 96.4 in adults and 90.1 in children, and the technical error of measurement of 1.6% in adults and 1.8% in children. Using a predicted rather than a measured thoracic gas volume did not significantly affect percentage body fat estimates in adults, but resulted in overestimates of percentage body fat in children. Mean percentage body fat from ADP was higher than percentage body fat from HD, although this was statistically significant only in adults (29.3 vs 27.7%, P<0.05). The 95% confidence interval of the between-method differences for all subjects was −7 to +9% body fat, and the root mean square error (r.m.s.e.) was approximately 4% body fat. In the subset of individuals who were asked to compare the two methods, 46 out of 50 (92%) indicated that they preferred the ADP to HD.

CONCLUSION: ADP is a reliable method of measuring body composition that subjects found preferable to underwater weighing. However, as shown here and in most other studies, there are differences in percentage body fat estimates assessed by the two methods, perhaps related to body size, age or other factors, that are sufficient to preclude ADP from being used interchangeably with underwater weighing on an individual basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fomon S, Jesson R, Owen GM . Determination of body volume from infants by a method of helium displacement Ann N Y Acad Sci 1963 110: 80–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gnaedinger R, Reinike E, Pearson A, Van Huss W, Wessel J, Montoye H . Determination of body density by air displacement, helium dilution, and underwater weighing Ann NY Acad Sci 1963 110: 96–108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor A, Aksoy Y, Scopes J, Du Mont G, Taylor B . Development of an air displacement method for whole body volume measurement in infants J Biomed Eng 1985 7: 9–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dempster P, Aitkens S . A new air displacement method for the determination of body composition Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995 27: 1692–1697.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McCrory MA, Gomez TD, Bernauer EM, Mole PA . Evaluation of a new air displacement plethysmograph for measuring human body composition Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995 27: 1686–1691.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Biaggi RJ, Vollman MW, Nies MA, Brener CE, Flakoll PJ, Levenhagen DK, Sun M, Karabulut Z, Chen KY . Comparison of air-displacement plethysmography with hydrostatic weighing and bioelectrical impedance analysis for the assessment of body composition in healthy adults Am J Clin Nutr 1999 69: 898–903.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Collins MA, Millard-Stafford ML, Sparling PB, Snow TK, Rosskopf LB, Webb SA, Omer J . Evaluation of the Bod Pod for assessing body fat in collegiate football players Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999 31: 1350–1356.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Iwaoka H, Yokoyama T, Nakayama T, Matsumura Y, Yoshitake Y, Fuchi T, Yoshiike N, Tanaka H . Determination of percent body fat by the newly developed sulfur hexafluoride dilution method and air displacement plethysmography J Nutr Sci Vitaminol 1998 44: 561–568.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sardinha LB, Lohman TG, Teixeira PJ, Guedes DP, Going SB . Comparison of air displacement plethysmography with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and 3 field methods for estimating body composition in middle-aged men Am J Clin Nutr 1998 68: 786–793.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dewit O, Fuller N, Elia M, Wells J . Whole-body plethysmography compared with hydrodensitometry for body composition analysis Proc Nutr Soc 1998 58: 59A.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nuñez C, Kovera AJ, Pietrobelli A, Heshka S, Horlick M, Kehayias J, Wang Z, Heymsfield SB . Body composition in children and adults by air displacement plethysmography Eur J Clin Nutr 1999 53: 382–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Roche AF . Growth, maturation and body composition: The Fels Longitudinal Study 1929–1991 Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 1992.

  13. Dubois D, Dubois EF . A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known Arch Intern Med 1916 17: 863–871.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Crapo RO, Morris AH, Clayton PD, Nixon CR . Lung volumes in healthy non-smoking adults Bull Eur Physiopath Respir 1982 18: 419–425.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Siri, WE . The gross composition of the body. In: C Tobias, J Lawrence (eds). Advances in biological and medical physics. Academic Press: New York 1956 239–280.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Levenhagen D, Borel MJ, Welch D, Piasecki J, Piasecki D, Chen K, Flakoll P . A comparison of air displacement plethysmography with three other techniques to determine body fat in healthy adults J Parentera Enteral Nutr 1999 23: 293–299.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Elia M, Ward LC . New techniques in nutritional assessment: body composition methods Proc Nutr Soc 1999 58: 33–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Roche A . Anthropometry and ultrasound. In: A Roche, S Heymsfield, T Lohman (eds). Human body composition. Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL 1996 167–189.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Going S . Densitometry. In: A Roche, S Heymsfield, T Lohman (eds). Human body composition. Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL 1996 pp 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  20. McCrory MA, Mole PA, Gomez TD, Dewey KG, Bernauer EM . Body composition by air-displacement plethysmography by using predicted and measured thoracic gas volumes J Appl Physiol 1998 84: 1475–1479.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge Alesha Patterson, Derrick Coleman, Merita Moffitt and Jean Payne for their technical assistance with this study. Funding was provided through a Research Challenge Grant from Wright State University, NIH HD12252 and NIH HD27063.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Community Health, Lifespan Health Research Center, Wright State University School of Medicine, Kettering, Ohio, USA

    EW Demerath, SS Guo, WC Chumlea, B Towne, AF Roche & RM Siervogel

Authors
  1. EW Demerath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. SS Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. WC Chumlea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. B Towne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. AF Roche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. RM Siervogel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to EW Demerath.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Demerath, E., Guo, S., Chumlea, W. et al. Comparison of percent body fat estimates using air displacement plethysmography and hydrodensitometry in adults and children. Int J Obes 26, 389–397 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801898

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801898

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links