Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The prediction of abdominal visceral fat level from body composition and anthropometry: ROC analysis

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the merit of body mass index (BMI), % body fat, waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio as predictors of abdominal visceral fat (AVF) level.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional measurements obtained from 458 female and 331 male subjects of French Canadian descent with an age range from 18–72 y.

MEASUREMENTS: AVF level was assessed by computed tomography. BMI was calculated as weight (in kg) divided by stature2 (in m), body density was derived from underwater weighing and % body fat was computed from the estimate of body density with the Siri equation. Waist-to-hip ratio was calculated as waist circumference divided by hip circumference. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify the optimal cut-off points.

RESULTS: In younger women (<40 y, n=258), waist-to-hip ratio was the poorest predictor of AVF level with areas under the ROC curves (Az) ranging from 0.684–0.716, sensitivity (Sen) from 63.3–68.8% and specificity (Spe) from 64.0–67.5%, whereas the Az, Sen and Spe for other predictors ranged from 0.924–0.983, 87.0–96.8, and 83.4–92.7, respectively. The same trend was observed in older (≥40 y, n=200) women, although differences between waist-to-hip ratio and other predictors were less pronounced. In older men, waist circumference was the best overall predictor (Az from 0.88–0.92), whereas BMI showed the lowest Az values (0.831–0.875, P≤0.001 vs waist circumference). In younger men, BMI had the smallest Az (P<0.007 vs others) with the lowest AVF cut-off point (100 cm2). However, with higher AVF cut-offs the differences were not significant.

CONCLUSION: Waist circumference is the best overall predictor of abdominal visceral obesity, whereas in women waist-to-hip ratio is a poor indicator of AVF and its use as a surrogate measure of visceral fat should be avoided.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C Bouchard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rankinen, T., Kim, SY., Pérusse, L. et al. The prediction of abdominal visceral fat level from body composition and anthropometry: ROC analysis. Int J Obes 23, 801–809 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0800929

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0800929

Keywords

  • BMI
  • percent body fat
  • WHR
  • waist girth
  • ROC curves

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links