Abstract
JUDGING from the letter addressed to NATURE of September 26 (p. 545), Mr. Hall (like Prof. Sayce in the Times of September 17) has been thrown into a state of doubt in regard to the real sex (? and age) of the mummy supposed to be “Queen Tii” by a letter from Mr. Theodore Davis, calling in question the accuracy of my statement that the mummy supposed to be an old lady of at least fifty years is the skeleton of a young man of about half that age.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
SMITH, G. The Body of Queen Tii. Nature 76, 615–616 (1907). https://doi.org/10.1038/076615a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/076615a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
