Abstract
MR. J. J. LISTER in his presidential address to Section D at the British Association felt it his duty to go somewhat out of his way in order to urge on biometricians “that the old adage should be borne in mind recommending that before beginning culinary operations it is advisable first to catch your hare, in other words, to make sure that the problem you seek to elucidate is sound from the standpoint of biology before bringing a formidable mathematical apparatus into action for its investigation” (NATURE, August 16, p. 400). The importance of the occasion no doubt prevented Mr. Lister from illustrating his criticism he had much else to deal with, and he probably hoped that his words without detailed proof would have all the weight which attaches to presidential utterances. These are not made without careful thought and proper study. But in order that a criticism of this kind should be effective, biometricians need more information, and they recognised that Mr. Lister could hardly refuse to cite instances of the type of work which led to his advice.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
PEARSON, K. The Latest Critic of Biometry. Nature 74, 465–466 (1906). https://doi.org/10.1038/074465c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/074465c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.