Abstract
NEWTON believed in the possibility of absolute motion (i.e. motion in space not necessarily relative to other material bodies), founding his argument on the fact that the rotation of a planet might be detected by experiment on the planet itself without reference to outside bodies. Newton's reasoning is unanswerable, but it only takes us part of the way. Though it proves that using the principle of gyrostatic action we can determine direction in space absolutely, it fails to distinguish one parallel line from another. We can only observe relative motion. This statement, which no one doubts, is generally taken to be synonymous with the assertion that nothing but relative motion will ever be known. So firmly is this generalisation rooted in the present generation of philosophers that I am afraid the expression of a contrary opinion will only result in placing its author on the “Index” of De Morgan's Budget of Paradoxes.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
SCHUSTER, A. A Plea for Absolute Motion. Nature 73, 462–464 (1906). https://doi.org/10.1038/073462b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/073462b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.