Abstract
SINCE my letter on this subject in NATURE of March 23, I have noticed that a slight change in the formula—the reduction of the constant from 10˙5 to 10˙1—gives much better results. The agreement is now very close indeed. The amended statement now runs as follows:—
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BELL, E. Mammalian Longevity. Nature 60, 30–31 (1899). https://doi.org/10.1038/060030b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/060030b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
