Abstract
All motion is relative. This apparently universal statement is a particular statement about the meanings of words. The word “motion” means “relative motion,” or, more precisely, “the motion of a body” means its motion relative to other bodies. We may go further and make the still more fundamental statement that all position is relative, or, in other words, the position of a body means its position relative to other bodies. It is easy for anyone who puts words together without reflecting sufficiently on their meaning to put together the noun “motion” or “position” and the adjective “absolute,” but the expressions “absolute motion” and “absolute position” are nevertheless meaningless, just as much so as “white blackness,” “retrograde progress,” “the action between a rough body and a smooth body at their point of contact,” or “the potential energy of non-conservative forces.”
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
LOVE, A. The alleged Absoluteness of Motions of Rotation. Nature 51, 198–199 (1894). https://doi.org/10.1038/051198a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/051198a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.