Abstract
IN his able address at the annual meeting of the Chemical Society, the President spoke of chemical text-books somewhat scornfully. While I confess that I am not prepared to regard these books as “soul-destroying,” one and all, I have long felt at least that the dogmatic exposition of the elementary laws of chemistry to which they have accustomed us is most unsatisfactory, and that a critical re-statement of first principles is much needed. To deal with the subject fully, would carry me far beyond the limits of a letter to NATURE; but it is proposed in the following communication to draw attention to certain serious misconceptions which have crept into modern text-books with regard to the Berthollet-Proust controversy and the Law of Definite Proportions, and to attempt to redefine somewhat more accurately the points which were at issue.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
HARTOG, P. The Berthollet-Proust Controversy and the Law of Definite Proportions. Nature 50, 149–150 (1894). https://doi.org/10.1038/050149b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/050149b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.