Abstract
IN reference to the letter of Messrs. Pocock and Bather, on the subject of the Zoological Record, in NATURE of November 16, I desire to state that the council of this Society (to which the Zoological Record at present belongs) quite agree with the above-named gentlemen in their wish to render the Zoological Record more complete by combining palæozoology with it. With this view the council some time since addressed the Geological Society, and suggested what in their opinion would be an equitable arrangement for carrying out the plan. This arrangement, however, as will be seen by the copy of the correspondence enclosed herewith, was rejected by the council of the Geological Society. It remains, therefore, for Mr. Bather and such members of the Geological Society as may share his sentiments, to do their best to induce the council of the Geological Society to alter their views upon this question.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
SCLATER, P. The “Zoological Record”. Nature 49, 123–124 (1893). https://doi.org/10.1038/049123a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/049123a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
