Abstract
I AM very much surprised to see that Prof. Ebbinghaus, in the last number of the Zeitschrift für Psychologie announces as new a discovery which has a critical bearing upon Hering's theory of colour-vision—the fact, namely, that two grays composed the one of blue and yellow, and the pother of red and green, and made equally bright at one illumination (by admixture of black with whicnever of them turns out to be the brighter), do not continue to be equally bright at a different illumination. If two complementary colours were purely antagonistic—that is, if the colour-processes simply destroyed each other, as processes of assimilation and dissimilation must do, and if the resulting white was solely due to the residual white which accompanies every colour and gives it its brightness, then the relative brightness of two grays composed out of different parts of the spectrum could not change with change of illumination. The fact that they do change is therefore completely subversive of the theory of Hering, or of any other theory in which the complementary colour-processes are of a nature to annihilate each other. This consequence of the fact, as well as the fact itself, I stated at the Congress of Psychologists in London in August, 1892, and it was printed in the abstract of my paper, which was distributed at the time, and also in the Proceedings of the Congress.
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
FRANKLIN, C. Hering's Theory of Colour Vision. Nature 48, 517 (1893). https://doi.org/10.1038/048517c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/048517c0
This article is cited by
-
Die Hell-Dunkeladaptation des Auges und die Funktion der Stäbchen und Zapfen
Ergebnisse der Physiologie (1902)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.