Abstract
IN following up Baltzer's erroneous reference concerning the “Demonstratio eliminationis Cramerianæ,” Mr. Muir, as described in his letter on p. 246, seems at first to have been singularly unlucky. For, on referring to the catalogue of Lord Crawford's mathematical library under “Mollweide,” although the work itself was not immediately forthcoming, there was a cross-reference to “Prasse, M. von,” under whose name the essay was duly catalogued. The Dun Echt copies, for there are two of them bound up in volumes of mathematical pamphlets, are copies of the original “Demonstratio,” in 8 folios, with the pages 4 to 15 numbered, and the last blank. In a gap on the title-page of one copy has been written “auct. Mauricius de Prasse,” apparently long ago, and in a German hand. But apart from this the last sentence of the first paragraph identifies the author as the writer of “Usus logarithmorum,” which bears the same Latin form of the name in print.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
COPELAND, R. An Incorrect Footnote and its Consequences. Nature 37, 343–344 (1888). https://doi.org/10.1038/037343c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/037343c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.