Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Miscellany
  • Published:

Notes

Abstract

ON Tuesday the Technical Instruction Bill was read a second time. The second reading having been moved by Sir W. Hart Dyke, Mr. S. Leighton proposed an amendment which would have led to the rejection of the measure, on the ground that a new change ought not at present to be imposed on ratepayers. The amendment was negatived; but in dealing with it Mr. Goschen and Mr. W. H. Smith found it necessary, as Mr. Mundella complained, to adopt a very “apologetic” and “persuasive” tone. The fact seems to indicate that a good many members of the House of Commons do not eve a yet realize that an adequate system of technical instruction is absolutely necessary to enable this country to hold its own in the industrial and commercial warfare of the present age.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Notes . Nature 36, 347–350 (1887). https://doi.org/10.1038/036347a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/036347a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing