Abstract
ON Tuesday the Technical Instruction Bill was read a second time. The second reading having been moved by Sir W. Hart Dyke, Mr. S. Leighton proposed an amendment which would have led to the rejection of the measure, on the ground that a new change ought not at present to be imposed on ratepayers. The amendment was negatived; but in dealing with it Mr. Goschen and Mr. W. H. Smith found it necessary, as Mr. Mundella complained, to adopt a very “apologetic” and “persuasive” tone. The fact seems to indicate that a good many members of the House of Commons do not eve a yet realize that an adequate system of technical instruction is absolutely necessary to enable this country to hold its own in the industrial and commercial warfare of the present age.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Notes . Nature 36, 347–350 (1887). https://doi.org/10.1038/036347a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/036347a0