Abstract
IN reply to my letter answering Prof. Milne's assertions (NATURE, NOV. 25, p. 75), Mr. T. Gray (his associate in seismometric work) says nothing in support of these, but attacks me on two distinct and quite irrelevant issues. The tone of Mr. Gray's letter (Dec. 9, p. 126) is unusual: as to that no answer is necessary; but the two questions of fact raised by him require reply.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
EWING, J. Seismometry. Nature 35, 172–173 (1886). https://doi.org/10.1038/035172c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/035172c0
This article is cited by
-
Horizontal pendulum development and the legacy of Ernst von Rebeur-Paschwitz
Journal of Seismology (2012)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.