IN your issue of February 19 (p. 361), E. Douglas Archibald calls attention to a typical error in Ganot's “Physics,” 10th edition, p. 325, and assumed that it had run through the ten editions. If he had taken the pains to look back to previous editions the formula would have appeared right, viz.:—.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
EMERY, F. An Error in Ganot's “Physics”. Nature 31, 505 (1885). https://doi.org/10.1038/031505b0
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.